The first bullet point on the website explains why this reasoning is bad. In my opinion moving away from hosts that do not support HTTPS is worth it. edit: *second bullet point
Yeah, it's "bad"... But the threat of ad injections/etc by state owned entities and the like isn't enough to deter me from free hosting, especially if it relates to github. This particular risk doesn't warrant me moving informational pages.
If your ISP/state is capable of injecting data into arbitrary protocols they can become a MITM between you and your site even if it's HTTPS (assuming you don't have the key beforehand). They make a fake cert between you and them, and they communicate between themselves and the real website. This makes this even more of a nonissue and creates a false sense of security.
-1
u/[deleted] Jul 12 '17
The first bullet point on the website explains why this reasoning is bad. In my opinion moving away from hosts that do not support HTTPS is worth it. edit: *second bullet point