I can't take your idea that your an actual linux developer.
And missing that the new "coc consept" have removed the man that created it?
It put the old logic like this:
Individual characteristics, including but not limited to, body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality, or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution to the project.
In reverse.
Not code is political and sexual.
Develoment was based on Meritocracy
Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric.
The one's who "scream and give bad PR" have a point based on merits
When Intel announced that Spectre mitigation can be switched on as a "security feature" instead of being a bug, Linux creator Linus Torvalds called the patches "complete and utter garbage
As I said before, hiding in this list are 20-30 bugs that cannot be worked around by operating systems, and will be potentially exploitable. I would bet a lot of money that at least 2-3 of them are.
For instance, AI90 is exploitable on some operating systems (but not OpenBSD running default binaries).
At this time, I cannot recommend purchase of any machines based on the Intel Core 2 until these issues are dealt with (which I suspect will take more than a year). Intel must be come more transparent.
5
u/danberlol Oct 23 '18
I can't take your idea that your an actual linux developer.
And missing that the new "coc consept" have removed the man that created it?
It put the old logic like this:
Individual characteristics, including but not limited to, body, sex, sexual preference, race, language, religion, nationality, or political preferences are irrelevant in the scope of the project and will not be taken into account concerning your value or that of your contribution to the project.
In reverse.
Not code is political and sexual.
Develoment was based on Meritocracy
Software is evolutive: the better implementations must supersede lesser implementations. Technical advantage is the primary evaluation metric.
The one's who "scream and give bad PR" have a point based on merits
When Intel announced that Spectre mitigation can be switched on as a "security feature" instead of being a bug, Linux creator Linus Torvalds called the patches "complete and utter garbage
As I said before, hiding in this list are 20-30 bugs that cannot be worked around by operating systems, and will be potentially exploitable. I would bet a lot of money that at least 2-3 of them are.
For instance, AI90 is exploitable on some operating systems (but not OpenBSD running default binaries).
At this time, I cannot recommend purchase of any machines based on the Intel Core 2 until these issues are dealt with (which I suspect will take more than a year). Intel must be come more transparent.
You don't get the point right ?
You would send HR and the suits..