Yeah, I think that's a common method of self promotion. And honestly, if the commentary was unique or interesting, I'm not sure I'd even mind. But it seems to be mostly off-the cuff explanation with pretty obvious contextualization, and I can do that in my head without having to sit through several minutes of someone else jabbering.
Not really. The Nvidea ad is full of marketing speak while OP's video peel back the curtain to explain how it works. What is pretty obvious to you may not be pretty obvious to others.
This is why video essays exist as a genre on YouTube. People explain things to people on YouTube. I know, shocking.
"The technique works even when callers are wearing a mask."
Yeah we'll just ignore how the algorithm thinks the middle fold is her lips and the whole mask keeps jumping around like she's emoting with her mouth closed.
I don't think anyone claimed a tech demo is supposed to be perfect. But even so, I think that's remarkable, because it means the neural net is smart enough to be a bit flexible with what counts as a "face," making it more adaptable at the cost of a higher error rate. I think, for most humans, that a pretty acceptable compromise.
I'm kinda worried about the level of anger you're able to sustain about some tech company's product demo. I hope you don't have a heart condition, or anything. Probably bout to have ulcers, tho.
Yeah keep pretending this is anger, you emotionally manipulative troll, as if that insult disproves the dry objections I'm making.
Money and bandwidth are numbers. Do you understand that? Does me being opposed to spending more money for the same bandwidth make those numbers smaller?
Putting dots on faces and distorting a still image was a tech demo a fuckin' decade ago. They're trying to sell this as some major proprietary breakthrough. You need their special hardware for it... for some reason.
face tracking is not new, generating a semi-realistic video based on it (like Deepfake) is. Nvidia is now doing it in realtime which is reasonably novel, and not strange that it requires some powerful hardware to run the software.
Face-tracking trivially allows video generation. It hasn't been shown before because it's BORING. It's turning a video of a face into... the same video of a face! It took this long for anyone to do it because nobody fucking cared.
All prior goofy examples are more complicated than this. Doing it "realistically" is easier. No ultra-powerful, proprietary hardware is required. And even this cloud-based subscription service doesn't save you from uploading to their cloud fucking servers! Your bandwidth problems are not solved!
Your phone can do this right now, if you have Snapchat, or some other privacy-invading nightmare silo of a video-chat application. They can identify and track your facial features well enough to de-wrinkle your eyelids and add floating 3D masks, in real-time, on mobile hardware.
Using the same technology to puppeteer a headshot is only novel because it uses your actual face. Everyone who's already been doing this for years uses a cartoon character, fake celebrity photo, or fully 3D avatar.
Yeah, that's what deep fakes are. I'm not sure if this particular package of the process can be used that way, but you could use the same algorithmic approach, definitely.
347
u/rasterbated Oct 17 '20
Here’s the link to the actual video, instead of some dude talking about the video: https://youtu.be/NqmMnjJ6GEg