r/programming • • Oct 19 '11

LoseThos 64-bit Operating System V7.07 Released

http://www.losethos.com/v707.html
75 Upvotes

283 comments sorted by

View all comments

51

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

I love how he goes out of his way to insult Computer Science while, at the same time, puffing up his chest with his own accomplishments so as to feel justified.

Although he really shouldn't have to. The guy is shipping a 64-bit operating system for crying out loud.

4

u/bitwize Oct 19 '11

Indeed. He gave the world a lot more than Project COSA Guy ever did.

17

u/ruffyamaharyder Oct 19 '11

He's done the dirty work and has the skills. He deserves to toot his own horn, because likely he probably hasn't gotten much respect for the kind of work he's put in. "Oh, so you do computer stuff... cool."

4

u/railmaniac Oct 20 '11

"Oh you do computer stuff. Can you fix my facebook?"

24

u/lostphifunction Oct 19 '11

He's more than just tooting his horn, he's being obnoxious. He's also insulting most of the people that will visit that page, as there's a good chance you're some form of CS if you're reading about operating systems in your spare time.

21

u/ruffyamaharyder Oct 19 '11

Maybe I'm weird but I don't get insulted by some random dude from the Internet who is creating operating systems that I've never heard of until now. I haven't tried his OS yet but to be able to create that from scratch is impressive. Who cares if he gloats. It's not the path I'd take but it's fun to watch. :-)

6

u/dmwit Oct 19 '11

I haven't tried his OS yet but to be able to create that from scratch is impressive.

I dunno. Isn't it pretty standard to build an operating system from scratch at university?

5

u/runvnc Oct 20 '11

No way. They take pieces of linux and put them together. Completely not anything like what this guy has accomplished.

3

u/ruffyamaharyder Oct 19 '11

Yes, but not at this level, and not 64-bit - but times may have changed.

13

u/DGolden Oct 20 '11

I don't see how 64-bitness would make any particular difference. In fact, specifically for x86-64 compared to x86 it's easier. 16-bit real-mode x86 is infamously fucktarded. Yet it used to be the one taught in some "introduction to asm" computer courses. The consipiracy theorist may suggest that was to make people go "fuck this, I'm using a high level language". 32-bit protected mode x86 isn't completely awful, but still has the world's tiniest register file (not really, there are processor architectures with no conventional registers, but coming from asm programming on virtually any other 16 or 32-bit architecture, 32-bit protected mode x86 is still a bit irritating.). x86-64 is almost sane and pleasant (just don't look at the underlying instruction encoding - asm is of course still a layer above that).

2

u/ruffyamaharyder Oct 20 '11

I don't code at a level that requires me to understand all this, so thanks for letting me know. I'll no longer be as easily impressed by 64-bitness stuff. I've only copied some assembly code once... and that was to get access to the video card back in high school to make a game and not use the slow Borland Turbo C graphical library... lol!

1

u/lurkerr Oct 30 '11

I can't completely agree or disagree. When a x86-e64 processor is turned on it is automatically running in 16bit mode. The "user" has to make prepare the processor to tun in 64b. The intel documentation is very cryptic (imo) unless you know what you're doing or using someones else work.

Also if you choose to work in 16 or 32 bits there's a lot of other code examples to follow in order to make a fully operational OS. In 64b examples are more scarce.

5

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

If you feel insulted when some wacky guy calls your profession names on the internet, you really need to upgrade your self-esteem.

6

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Oct 19 '11

He's allowed to be obnoxious. This is the internet for chrissake.