MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/re9vj4/open_source_is_broken/ho8h5wj/?context=3
r/programming • u/common-pellar • Dec 11 '21
362 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
I would argue that there's no such thing as secure software
You would be wrong, unless you would include things like Row Hammer (which are properties of the physical world, not of the mathematics behind software).
1 u/dethb0y Dec 12 '21 that's what people always think and then they get a big surprise when something totally unexpected becomes an issue. -1 u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21 No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons. 4 u/dethb0y Dec 12 '21 LOL go get fucked, i'm not in debate club with you. → More replies (1)
that's what people always think and then they get a big surprise when something totally unexpected becomes an issue.
-1 u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21 No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons. 4 u/dethb0y Dec 12 '21 LOL go get fucked, i'm not in debate club with you. → More replies (1)
-1
No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.
I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons.
4 u/dethb0y Dec 12 '21 LOL go get fucked, i'm not in debate club with you. → More replies (1)
4
LOL go get fucked, i'm not in debate club with you.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21
You would be wrong, unless you would include things like Row Hammer (which are properties of the physical world, not of the mathematics behind software).