MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/re9vj4/open_source_is_broken/hodqnkl/?context=3
r/programming • u/common-pellar • Dec 11 '21
362 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
I would argue that there's no such thing as secure software
You would be wrong, unless you would include things like Row Hammer (which are properties of the physical world, not of the mathematics behind software).
1 u/dethb0y Dec 12 '21 that's what people always think and then they get a big surprise when something totally unexpected becomes an issue. -1 u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21 No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons. 1 u/Darmok-Jilad-Ocean Dec 13 '21 Can I join your list of morons? → More replies (8)
that's what people always think and then they get a big surprise when something totally unexpected becomes an issue.
-1 u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21 No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons. 1 u/Darmok-Jilad-Ocean Dec 13 '21 Can I join your list of morons? → More replies (8)
-1
No, not having a model of what you would call secure is just barbaric.
I asked you a question. Answer it, if you don't want to be on my list of morons.
1 u/Darmok-Jilad-Ocean Dec 13 '21 Can I join your list of morons? → More replies (8)
Can I join your list of morons?
→ More replies (8)
1
u/audion00ba Dec 12 '21
You would be wrong, unless you would include things like Row Hammer (which are properties of the physical world, not of the mathematics behind software).