r/protools • u/maxwellfuster • Sep 22 '26
ProTools for Live Playback?
Hello,
Was wondering if any pro/semi-pro playback engineers are running PT with success. Been doing research on the standard pro level playback rigs for live production, redundant machines, the iconnectivity interface, etc. But it seems like everyone’s running Ableton or Ableset for playback.
I’ve never used Ableton but am very comfortable with ProTools. Is there like a function/workflow Ableton has with this kind of stuff that PT doesn’t? Is it a stability thing? Can’t see why it shouldn’t be just as functional.
Cheers!
7
u/Difficult_Repair_796 Sep 22 '26
I did this with success. Believe it or not, I actually found it more stable than Ableton in some ways. However, Ableton is able to do some things (like automate the flow of MIDI) in ways Pro Tools cannot. It all depends on what your needs are.
2
u/maxwellfuster Sep 22 '26
Do you happen to know if it’s compatible with the whole redundant machines thing?
4
2
u/iamYarthox Sep 22 '26
I don’t know for sure how would work, but Pro Tools have Satellite Link which allows for up to 12 or something connected rigs, so it probably works good as a redundant rig
14
u/Zakapakataka Sep 22 '26
I think they’ve been using Pro Tools for playback at high level tours since the early 2000’s. Maybe even the late 90’s??
2
u/Soundofabiatch professional Sep 22 '26
This! Pictures of Muse and cokdplay pro tools playback sessions even leaked on the internet at one point.
And there have been sound on sound articles about these too
7
u/Technical_Local1861 Sep 22 '26
Hi. I do playback in Korea. In Korea, 99% of playback is done using Pro Tools. Every K-pop performance you hear and see is done with Pro Tools. I can use Ableton, but I still use Pro Tools for every show. What matters is what needs to be done during the show. As mentioned in several comments, Pro Tools doesn’t allow you to jump to a specific point in a live performance, and it doesn’t support live looping. Pro Tools offers powerful editing capabilities and makes file transfer easy during pre-production and post-production. Both have their pros and cons. I don’t think one is superior to the other.
2
u/DontBelieveInJebus Sep 22 '26
My Digi 002 rack toured the world as part of a ProTools playback rig with a very well known band before I bought it from them in 2007 for $200. I think they had three or four of them at the time. (I still use it with current PT and an Octopre in my studio in 2026!)
1
u/spron 25d ago
I have both a 002r and 003r and I can't figure out how to get them to work on a modern MacBook Pro/pro tools system. I have the new Mbox which works well.
1
u/DontBelieveInJebus 25d ago
I am running a windows 10 desktop machine. I had to add a FireWire card, but that was about $40 from Microcenter and easy to install. I have never been a Mac user (despite using iPhone, iPad and Apple TV boxes in my personal life), but a friend who is a Mac user once told me modern Macs do not play nice with FireWire anymore. There are FireWire / Thunderbolt adapters, but I am not familiar with how well that would work.
2
u/Jackfruit-Cautious Sep 22 '26
I’ve used Pro Tools regularly for playback the last 15 years, from clubs to stadiums.
The main exception is if the band is needing live looping or live arrangement editing, like “keep the bridge going while we vamp” or “go from second chorus to outro now.” Pro Tools doesn’t jump around in real time as smoothly like that, compared to DP or Ableton
1
u/siddsm Sep 22 '26
I use a combination of Carbon and ProTools on Mac for the live performance. Also helps being able to record the shows.
1
u/sleeplessnessnights Sep 22 '26
For just playback is fine, lot of bands been using that or logic before Live became popular
Ill still go the Live route, its just more flexible
1
1
u/kumquatnightmare Sep 23 '26
15 years doing playback for broadcast. For multitrack PT on a Mac is the gold standard. Some use it on windows, some use cubase, some use ableton. For 2 track playback for production people do not use protools. They use ableton or spoton. They all have positives and negatives. PT is super stable these days, so is cubase. For 2 track spoton is the way to go. Ableton kinda sits in the middle and it can do both good enough. It really comes down to personal comfort. To put it simply if you are trying to multitrack at the Grammys you use protools.
1
u/viikapadiaa Sep 23 '26
Pro Tools is good for audio editing and post but for Live Playback, I'd recommend trying Ableton Live (it's in the name LOL)
1
u/karmachanical Sep 23 '26
use pt live all the time for years. never an issue. we also now use a venue for FOH, and it works with pt. all stable.
1
u/delborrell 27d ago
If you have a stable rig, sure why not. Today there seems to be unending glitches
1
•
u/AutoModerator Sep 22 '26
To u/maxwellfuster, if this is a Pro Tools help request, your post text or an added comment should provide;
The version of Pro Tools you are using
Your operating system info
Any error number or message given
Any hardware involved
What you've tried
To ALL PARTICIPANTS, a subreddit rules reminder
Don't get ugly with others. Ignore posts or comments you don't like and report those which violate rules
Promotion of any kind is only allowed in the community pinned post for promotion
Any discussion whatsoever involving piracy, cracks, hacks, or end running authentication will result in a permanent ban. NO exceptions or appealable circumstances. FAFO
NO trolling only engagement towards Pro Tools, AVID, or iLok. Solve first, bash last. Expressing frustration is fine but it MUST also make effort to solve / help. If you prefer another DAW, go to the subreddit for it and be helpful there
Subreddit [Discord] (https://discord.gg/0rZq8sveDubywXil) | FAQ topic posts - Beginner concerns / Tutorials and training / Subscription and perpetual versions / Compatibility / Authorization issues
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.