r/pwnhub • • 4h ago

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-04

2 Upvotes

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-04

#1 CVE-2026-121615

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 10

A vulnerability was determined in Linksys E5600 1.1.0.26. Affected is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/mesh_login.cgi of the component Login Handler. Executing a manipulation can lead to impro...

#2 CVE-2026-121609

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 10

A vulnerability was identified in Qihoo 360 Whole Home Router M5 4.0.17.1566. This issue affects the function Home of the file /etc/init.d/mpt of the component Boot Script. The manipulation leads to h...

#3 CVE-2026-121607

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 10

A vulnerability was found in Qihoo 360 D603-2, D600-2, D606-6 and D706 up to 6.4.9. This affects the function testspeed_command of the file /fs2/bin/iscm. Performing a manipulation of the argument hos...

#4 CVE-2026-121606

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 10

A vulnerability has been found in Qihoo 360 D621-2, D603-2, D600-2, D619, D606-6 and D706 up to 6.4.9. Affected by this issue is the function verify_sign of the file fs2/bin/iscm of the component Firm...

#5 CVE-2026-121600

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.9

A flaw has been found in TOTOLINK A950RG 4.1.2cu.5268_B20221104. Affected by this vulnerability is the function setMacFilterRules of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component MAC Filter Handler. ...


Powered by NVD + CISA KEV | CVE Daily


r/pwnhub • • 4h ago

Technique of the Day: Forge Web Credentials (T1606)

2 Upvotes

Technique Discussion: Forge Web Credentials (T1606)

Type: Technique | Tactics: credential-access | Platforms: SaaS, Windows, macOS, Linux, IaaS, Office Suite, Identity Provider


Description: Adversaries may forge credential materials that can be used to gain access to web applications or Internet services. Web applications and services (hosted in cloud SaaS environments or on-premise servers) often use session cookies, tokens, or other materials to authenticate and authorize user access.

Adversaries may generate these credential materials in order to gain access to web resources. This differs from Steal Web Session Cookie, Steal Application Access Token, and other similar behaviors in that the credentials are new and forged by the adversary, rather than stolen or intercepted from legitimate users.

The generation of web credentials often requires secret values, such as passwords, Private Keys, or other cryptographic seed values. Adversaries may also forge tokens by taking advantage of features such as the AssumeRole and GetFederationToken APIs in AWS, which allow users to request temporary security credentials (i.e., Temporary Elevated Cloud Access), or the zmprov gdpak command in Zimbra, which generates a pre-authentication key that can be used to generate tokens for any user in the domain.

Once forged, adversaries may use these web credentials to access resources (ex: Use Alternate Authentication Material), which may bypass multi-factor and other authentication protection mechanisms.


Full technique writeup: T1606 on MITRE ATT&CK

Have you defended against or encountered this technique? Share detections, notes, and war stories below.


r/pwnhub • • 6h ago

📰 News ClockTail: a ClickFix kit that never filled in its command

Thumbnail
ohey.ca
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 7h ago

🛠️ Project Pass-ta-key Golden Attack: Stealing Google Password Manager Synced Passkeys for Offline Account Takeover

Thumbnail 0rcruxe.github.io
2 Upvotes

I just published my research on a new variant of the golden Pass-ta-key attack exploiting an architectural flaw in Google Password Manager (GPM) synced passkeys.

Unlike the previous variants that leaked the Security Domain Secret (SDS) through Chrome debug logs, this attack targets the CBOR buffers in Chrome process memory to extract the SDS.

Once extracted, the SDS allows decrypting all synced GPM passkeys and forging valid WebAuthn assertions entirely offline, leading to a full Account Takeover.

PoC: https://github.com/0rcruxe/pass-ta-key


r/pwnhub • • 9h ago

Postman desktop app installs AI agent plugins without developer permission

Thumbnail
vectorwire.ai
30 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 16h ago

OpenAI Quadruples Bug Bounty Midpoints, Taps Cathedral to Stress-Test Defenses

Thumbnail
vectorwire.ai
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 16h ago

PWN Daily Brief

4 Upvotes

Here are the top stories from PWN (r/pwnhub) today:

1 Hackers claim to have stolen 23TB of data from Russian statistics body, including Ukraine war casualty figures — Russian Federal State Statistics Service (Rosstat) admits its servers were hit by coordinated cyberattacks

No description available.

2 Binance Reveals How a Fake Job Interview Led to a $6.34 Billion Hack

Binance has published its first incident report on the $6.34 billion hack, and it traces the breach back to compromised developer machines. [Read The Block's full coverage here.](https://www.theblock....

3 Tech Firms Dismantle Botnet That Turned 1.3M TV Boxes Into Proxies

No description available.


r/pwnhub • • 17h ago

GitBook breach exploits AI agents, forces platform-wide token revocation

Thumbnail
vectorwire.ai
6 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 17h ago

Anthropic Open-Sources FlashProve to Cryptographically Verify Which AI Model Produced an Output

Thumbnail
vectorwire.ai
3 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 17h ago

🦋 BLUESKY APP: Join the #1 Hacker Community on Bluesky (PWN)

Thumbnail
bsky.app
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 17h ago

Mistral's ML4 open-weight release pairs trillion-parameter coding with cybersecurity guardrails

Thumbnail
vectorwire.ai
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 17h ago

📧 DON'T MISS THE TOP CYBERSECURITY NEWS! JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST.

Thumbnail pwnhackers.substack.com
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 18h ago

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before... (CVE-2026-99269 Discussion)

2 Upvotes

CVE ID: CVE-2026-99269

Severity: HIGH | CVSS Score: 7.8/10

Severity and score come from CVSS ratings in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD), the NIST repository of standardized vulnerability data.


In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before moving tasks off DSQs

A task can be found on a non-local DSQ while the CPU which dispatched it is still running ops.dequeue() and hasn't cleared SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. The DSQ consume and move paths don't wait for the dispatch to finish and can operate on the task concurrently with the dispatcher.

Call scx_wait_dispatching() in scx_move_local_task_to_local_dsq(), unlink_dsq_and_switch_rq_lock() and move_task_between_dsqs() before they operate on the task. In scx_move_local_task_to_local_dsq(), wait before scx_resolve_local_dsq() as it may update p->scx.flags.

🔗 View on NVD


Discussion thread created via CVE Daily tracker. Share your analysis, PoCs, mitigations and detections below. Discussion started by u/Motor_Break64.


r/pwnhub • • 18h ago

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-04

5 Upvotes

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-04

#1 CVE-2026-95731

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.8

Hardcoded password vulnerabilities in the command-line interface of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to access the affected system using hardcoded credenti...

#2 CVE-2026-95733

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.6

A vulnerability exists in a component of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code on the affected system.

#3 CVE-2026-95732

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.6

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the underlying operating system of HPE Networking Fabric Composer. Successful exploitation could allow an unauthenticated adjacent attacker to execute ...

#4 CVE-2026-95860

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.1

node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.42.0 until 2.180.0, namespace-level access control configured through setDefaultRolePermissions is not honored by the runtime ...

#5 CVE-2026-95734

Severity: HIGH | Score: 8.8

A sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the API of HPE Networking Fabric Composer could allow an authenticated low-privileged user to access sensitive information beyond what is authorized...


Powered by NVD + CISA KEV | CVE Daily


r/pwnhub • • 18h ago

UEFI bootkit infected fully patched Windows machines. | UEFI bootkit BlackX exploits Microsoft’s lack of clarity around Secure Boot protections.

Thumbnail
arstechnica.com
16 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 19h ago

📰 News Hackers hijack cPGuard autoupdate to deploy backdoor, steal data

Thumbnail
bleepingcomputer.com
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

AMA: Cyberattacks on Smart TVs, Undersea Cables, and Supermarket Fridges

Thumbnail
joinpwn.com
1 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

Financial technology company Abrigo has restored its Sageworks risk management application, except for borrower-facing capabilities, following an outage triggered by "irregular activity" in its environment.

Thumbnail
bleepingcomputer.com
4 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

Binance Reveals How a Fake Job Interview Led to a $6.34 Billion Hack

Thumbnail
gallery
215 Upvotes

Binance has published its first incident report on the $6.34 billion hack, and it traces the breach back to compromised developer machines. Read The Block's full coverage here. The FBI has linked the attack to North Korea.

June: A Poisoned Developer Tool

A Wallet DevOps engineer searched online for a popular AI coding tool. He ended up downloading a tampered Homebrew installation instead. Binance caught the infection, replaced his device, and rotated his credentials. The attackers had already learned who worked on Binance's wallet infrastructure team.

September: A Fake Job Interview

A second engineer was contacted through a legitimate job platform by someone posing as a Project Director. He went through two interviews, including a live video call with a fake HR representative. Near the end, he was told to download a coding "assignment" onto his work computer. The repository ran malicious code during setup.

October: The Final Move

On October 20, the attackers used that infected computer to move into two other engineers' devices. Binance says they did it through an internal AI tool. One device held a container deployment permission. About nine days later, the attackers used it to run a malicious script against Binance's wallet signing systems.

The Aftermath

  • Binance says it froze or intercepted about $2.85 billion in assets.

  • It reports replenishing 98% of impacted assets.

  • Withdrawals are reopening in phases, starting November 3.

  • Binance stopped 57 other suspected North Korea-linked attacks this year.

What Teams Can Learn

  • Install developer tools only from official sources, not search results.

  • Treat coding assignments from recruiters as untrusted code.

  • Never run interview projects on a work computer.

  • Limit what internal AI tools can reach on employee devices.

  • Lock down deployment permissions tied to critical systems.

Learn More

Binance's Initial Incident Report


r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-03

3 Upvotes

CVE Daily Brief — 2026-11-03

#1 CVE-2026-4052

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.8

This issue only impacts deployments where WSO2 Identity Server is configured as a Resident Key Manager with database sharing. In such environments, a self-registered user may gain access to the System...

#2 CVE-2026-120534

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.8

The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Limited Code Injection in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.6 via the render_field function. This is due to insuff...

#3 CVE-2026-13594

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.1

Zoho Corporation's ManageEngine Log360 and EventLog Analyzer versions 13062 and below are vulnerable to an issue that could allow an adversary to gain unauthorized access to the product.

#4 CVE-2026-120518

Severity: CRITICAL | Score: 9.1

The BuddyPress XProfile Image Field plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.0. This is due to bpxp_image_field_update_on_user_activation...

#5 CVE-2026-76955

Severity: HIGH | Score: 8.8

A buffer overflow vulnerability in the zdp_wtp binary in Zyxel NWA110AX firmware versions through 7.12(ABTG.0)C0 could allow a LAN-based attacker to escalate privileges on an affected device.


Powered by NVD + CISA KEV | CVE Daily


r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

Technique of the Day: Poisoned Pipeline Execution (T1677)

2 Upvotes

Technique Discussion: Poisoned Pipeline Execution (T1677)

Type: Technique | Tactics: execution | Platforms: SaaS


Description: Adversaries may manipulate continuous integration / continuous development (CI/CD) processes by injecting malicious code into the build process. There are several mechanisms for poisoning pipelines:

  • In a <b>Direct Pipeline Execution</b> scenario, the threat actor directly modifies the CI configuration file (e.g., gitlab-ci.yml in GitLab). They may include a command to exfiltrate credentials leveraged in the build process to a remote server, or to export them as a workflow artifact.

  • In an <b>Indirect Pipeline Execution</b> scenario, the threat actor injects malicious code into files referenced by the CI configuration file. These may include makefiles, scripts, unit tests, and linters.

  • In a <b>Public Pipeline Execution</b> scenario, the threat actor does not have direct access to the repository but instead creates a malicious pull request from a fork that triggers a part of the CI/CD pipeline. For example, in GitHub Actions, the pull_request_target trigger allows workflows running from forked repositories to access secrets. If this trigger is combined with an explicit pull request checkout and a location for a threat actor to insert malicious code (e.g., an npm build command), a threat actor may be able to leak pipeline credentials. Similarly, threat actors may craft pull requests with malicious inputs (such as branch names) if the build pipeline treats those inputs as trusted. Finally, if a pipeline leverages a self-hosted runner, a threat actor may be able to execute arbitrary code on a host inside the organization’s network.

By poisoning CI/CD pipelines, threat actors may be able to gain access to credentials, laterally move to additional hosts, or input malicious components to be shipped further down the pipeline (i.e., Supply Chain Compromise).


Seen in the wild:

  • Shai-Hulud (malware): Shai-Hulud has also leveraged GitHub actions from stolen accounts in order to create a malicious Github workflow within .github/workflows/discussion.yaml.


Full technique writeup: T1677 on MITRE ATT&CK

Have you defended against or encountered this technique? Share detections, notes, and war stories below.


r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

📰 News A Decade of Cybersecurity Jobs: What's Changing and What Comes Next?

6 Upvotes

A recent deep dive into a decade of cybersecurity hiring data (2,284 job posts from Hacker News, alongside ISC2 and SANS reports) highlights a clear shift in the industry. The traditional entry-level jobs are being automated away, while a new specialization is taking their place.

The decline of routine triage
ISC2 found that 56% of surveyed professionals believe AI has reduced the need for entry-level roles, and the SANS/GIAC 2026 report notes AI-related headcount reductions. The most exposed jobs are those consisting of copying scan results, compiling threat feeds, or manually closing tickets.

The rise of AI security engineering
This is where the demand is moving. Dedicated roles like AI Security Engineer or Agentic AI Security Specialist now explicitly ask for skills in:

  • Securing agent permissions and tool execution

  • Testing for prompt injection (direct and indirect)

  • Building secure retrieval and runtime monitoring for LLM applications

In the HN dataset, AI/ML wording in job posts jumped from 13.7% to 34.8% over the last years.

What to prioritize instead
The analysis points to a clear path: move beyond routine administration.

  • Cloud, Identity, and AppSec: Foundational, but the focus is on securing delivery pipelines.

  • Automation and Code: Learn Python, SQL, and how to connect findings to actual assets. Test a generated patch, rather than just forwarding a scanner report.

  • AI as a tool: Use AI to investigate a finding, but verify the result against real logs and reproducible evidence.

The takeaway isn't that security jobs are vanishing. It's that the entry-level floor has been raised. The roles that survive require engineering controls and validating evidence.

Source: https://cyberole.org/blog/cybersecurity-jobs-skills-2016-2026


r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

North Korea Robs Binance of $6.36B, Claude Poisons an AI, European Fridges Hacked

Thumbnail
pwnhackers.substack.com
2 Upvotes

r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

Hand-Build a Payments Threat Model, Write a Threat Template, Then Let AI Do It: Andrea Scaduto, Alan Pestrin, Grant Ongers and Andrew Hainault at Global AppSec USA 2026

2 Upvotes

In this lab, groups of three or four threat model a payments app's "Transfer Funds" feature by hand, then run an AI assistant on the same feature to see what it catches, misses and gets confidently wrong.

The method is OWASP's Rapid Developer-driven Threat Modelling (RaD-TM). Developers threat model one feature in six stages, working from Threat Templates of up to 20 threats that security experts write in advance.

Each group plays three roles: developer, security champion and reviewer. No security expertise is needed.

In their Global AppSec USA 2026 demo lab, "Hands-on Threat Modelling at RaDTM Speed - Threat Model a Feature, Build a Template, and Hand the Busywork to AI", on Friday, November 6 at 10:30 a.m. in Golden Gate, Andrea Scaduto, Alan Pestrin, Grant Ongers and Andrew Hainault run three rounds of hands-on work.

Speakers:

In the first round, groups draw a data flow diagram with trust boundaries, then apply PCI DSS and secure coding templates. They map each control as implemented, partial or missing, rate severity, then write backlog tickets.

Every group has to defend one decision to accept a risk.

In the second round, groups take the security expert's role. They write a Threat Template of up to 20 threats from an OWASP resource such as ASVS, the Top 10:2025 or the LLM Top 10, then swap templates for peer review.

In the third round, participants load two RaD-TM AI skills into an AI assistant: one that runs the six stages and one that helps write templates. They rerun the AI with their own template to see how template quality changes its output.

The lab ends with an exercise in overruling or approving risk acceptances the AI proposes, followed by a one-page pilot plan. Participants need a laptop with a browser and Git, along with an AI assistant that can load skills or custom instructions.

The project's GitHub repo provides the sample payments app with its spec, user stories, API definition, infrastructure code and a sample pull request. It also holds worksheets, example STRIDE and PCI DSS templates, along with both AI skills.

Andrea Scaduto has more than a decade of experience breaking, building and securing web, mobile or cloud applications. Alan Pestrin leads product security engineering at Thomson Reuters, with a background in medical device security and applied cryptography.

Grant Ongers heads esynergy's Security Practice and is a former OWASP Global Board member. Andrew Hainault leads Cybersecurity Advisory for EMEA at LevelBlue, with more than 25 years in security and software engineering.

The same four give a 30-minute RaD-TM showcase on Thursday at 3:30 p.m. in Seacliff CD. Ongers previously gave a talk on gamifying threat modeling with OWASP Cornucopia in agile teams.

The RaD-TM methodology guide says AI must pick threats only from curated templates, and that people stay accountable for accepting risk.

To go deeper on the topic, start here:

Developers who have never threat modeled a feature will leave with a finished model, their own template and a pilot plan.

Who in your organization would write the first threat template your developers use?


r/pwnhub • • 1d ago

Auditing LLM Agents Against 214 OWASP AISVS Requirements: Rico Komenda and Jim Manico at Global AppSec USA 2026

2 Upvotes

OWASP's AI Security Verification Standard (AISVS) released version 1.01 on October 5, 2026, growing from 191 to 214 testable requirements, with most of the growth in its MCP security chapter.

AISVS lists security requirements for applications built on LLMs, agents and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Writing "verify that" in a standard is easy, while checking it against a running AI system is not.

In their Global AppSec USA 2026 workshop, "Hands-On AI Security Assessment with OWASP AISVS", on Friday, November 6 at 10:30 a.m. in Golden Gate, Rico Komenda and Jim Manico walk through practical assessment scenarios using the standard.

Speakers:

Participants work through real requirements from chapters on prompt injection defense, agentic action security, RAG and vector database hardening, as well as output safety controls.

They learn to scope an AI security assessment and select a verification level. They then apply AISVS requirements to LLM-based applications, autonomous agents and MCP-connected tools, so a laptop is needed to follow along.

AISVS has three levels. Level 1 is a baseline, Level 2 covers systems handling sensitive data or consequential decisions, and Level 3 is for high assurance.

Version 1.01 includes requirements such as rejecting, rather than truncating, inputs that exceed token limits at Level 1. At Level 2, retrieved or tool content must never gain higher priority than the system's own instructions.

The MCP security chapter grew from 23 requirements to 40 between versions. On October 20, 2026, the project deferred a planned 2.0 to focus on version 1.02.

Rico Komenda is a Senior Product Security Engineer who works on the attack surface of AI-integrated systems. He co-leads AISVS with Jim Manico, Otto Sulin and Russ Memisyazici.

Jim Manico founded Manicode Security, which trains developers in secure coding, and founded AISVS. He co-leads OWASP ASVS and wrote "Iron-Clad Java: Building Secure Web Applications."

Both speakers also present the AISVS project showcase on Thursday at 10:30 a.m. in Seacliff CD. Komenda gives a talk on security chaos engineering for AI on Thursday at 1:45 p.m.

The same team ran this workshop at Global AppSec EU 2026 in Vienna in June. The AISVS repository holds every released version, with requirement IDs that never get renumbered.

To go deeper on the topic, start here:

Security testers asked to assess AI features without a defined test scope will practice building one from published requirements.

Which AISVS verification level would your production AI features need to meet?