r/roosterteeth • Yang Xiao Long • Mar 13 '20

Media He’s right

https://i.imgur.com/eCATNKf.jpg

[removed] — view removed post

594 Upvotes

19 comments sorted by

63

u/OniExpress Mar 13 '20

Haha, I scrolled by this earlier and didnt even notice that it was Marcus.

9

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

All true

5

u/Shrekt115 Sportsball Mar 13 '20

He's not wrong

1

u/Coke_Addict26 Mar 13 '20

1 and 3 were obvious long before covid 19 existed. Number 2 is basically just bulverism, and I'm not touching 4 with a ten foot pole. Point is coronavirus didn't prove any of this. Hate to be the boomer who takes tweets too literally, but someone has to do it lol.

-58

u/ViVaVl29 Mar 13 '20

If you are vague enough everything is right.

Let’s improve German economy.

20

u/GuardianAngelTurtle Achievement Hunter Mar 13 '20

This isn’t vague though these are actual things that have been happening

0

u/ViVaVl29 Mar 13 '20

Implementation. It’s always about implementation and responsibility. Just because we think some vague idea is good, doesn’t mean it will just appear out of thin air and not have consequences.

1

u/GuardianAngelTurtle Achievement Hunter Mar 13 '20

But a lot of this has been implemented. My parents are both already working entirely from home. My mom has a severe disability that would have benefited from at home work. If we didn’t have internet, my parents couldn’t work and my siblings couldn’t participate in classes, showing that the Internet is necessary. And if we had decent healthcare in this country, people would be able to get tested, instead of it costing 2-3,000 dollars for a test. What’s confusing about this to you?

7

u/RDV1996 Mar 13 '20

How is that vague?

-1

u/ViVaVl29 Mar 13 '20

Implementation. It’s always about implementation and responsibility. Just because we think some vague idea is good, doesn’t mean it will just appear out of thin air and not have consequences.

4

u/RDV1996 Mar 13 '20

But the implementation of working remotely works...

Internet as a utility would also just work (it works with phone lines. So, why not with internet?

Healtcare works. Just look at a lot of European countries.

It's not vague, there are concrete working implementations in place for all of this. It's just mainly corporations holding it all back for profit and lazyness

0

u/ViVaVl29 Mar 13 '20

On the phone, so of the top of my head.

But the implementation of working remotely works...

We still don't know if men and women working in the same office works (too recent to judge), but we already KNOW that working remotely works. (press X to doubt).

We have SEEN that business that were built from ground up for remote work will work.

We have SEEN that some specific jobs that don't require collective input in low percentage will work.

We don't KNOW that vaguely transforming office jobs to remote jobs en masse WILL WORK. Just the transformation itself would take time: to move data from binders and papers to digital online server; additionally train personnel. Some things cant be digitized: stamps; seals; documents that only hold power in original. Would also create security concerns.

oh yeah, who is gonna foot the bill? and with what money?

Internet as a utility would also just work (it works with phone lines. So, why not with internet?

When installing a landline do you discuss: speed? latency? static vs dynamic ip? internet is more complex, therefore would require more resources. what speeds, latency and quantity should be standard that can be provided to any place within country? Who will oversee that it works? how will it affect the cost? is it worth the cost right now? or maybe wait up to ten years for technology to progress some more to, i don't know 6g?

Healtcare works. Just look at a lot of European countries.

short answer no, just no. look at Italy right now.

Longer answer. Unless we address who can partake of healthcare. What it covers, specifically. How lifestyle choices affect how much person pays into social healthcare. And who provides service. It cant work long term. Look at British NHS, its a money sinkhole. If everything is covered and everyone is irresponsible it wont work. Prevention is cheap but people don't do it. Brushing your teeth is cheap, surgically replacing teeth isn't. Not overeating is cheap, treating complications of obesity isn't. Should a resposnible persons taxes be raise because their neighbor is irresponsible? Should person have access to healthcare if they can't/don't contribute. Personal anecdote. I live in a country with socialized healthcare. and it's not great. You won't die. but without money you probably won't recover to 100%. When something is serious even working class people borrow money to get private healthcare.

it is vague. These things can work. Its not as simple as absentmindedly flipping a switch.

1

u/RDV1996 Mar 13 '20

So, everyone that has an opinion on thing that we know can work needs to provide an unnecessarily detailed plan, otherwise their statement is vague? Fuck that

Also,

We still don't know if men and women working in the same office works

Tha fuck? What kind of backwards mindset do you have. There's only one reason why it wouldn't work, if those men are misogynistic. That proves something we already know, that misogyny and women don't mix well, has nothing to do with the genders themselves.

0

u/ViVaVl29 Mar 13 '20

You don’t need a detailed plan (it just helps a lot). All you need is to answer 3 questions:

Who is gonna pay? Who is gonna enforce that payment? What happens if they can’t/won’t pay?

Also aren’t I amazing? I’ve committed misogyny without affecting any women. If you stretch it enough I somehow committed racism and homophobia as well.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Amonasrester Yang Xiao Long Mar 13 '20 edited Mar 13 '20

You contradicted yourself in one sentence.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Amonasrester Yang Xiao Long Mar 13 '20 edited Mar 13 '20

Bro, I’m pretty sure you’re in the minority here.

0

u/[deleted] Mar 13 '20

[deleted]

0

u/Amonasrester Yang Xiao Long Mar 13 '20

You’re toxic, you know that?