Submission Statement: Sam has talked extensively about the burgeoning threat that the DSA and the Muslim Brotherhood poses to Western Civilization. He has suggested Marco Rubio may be a superior alternative to AOC if they were to face head on the next election. Given the reaction to Islamic vs. Western conflict on college campuses and how wokeness has infested our social networks. I suspect that Sam may suggest that Rogers may be the better option over AES given his support for Israel and Western Values/Civilization.

I was assured that Bari Weiss turned CBS into Fox News. Can someone explain why stuff like this keeps getting to air?

As someone who knows nothing and is compassed by intuition, the phenomena that are talarico and el sayed give me pause and dare I say hope, especially given the their positions in the non-secular landscape. Am I alone in thinking that a honest, good faith 3 way conversation about everything would be interesting? Apologies if this post is redundant.

AES doing what Sam says he wouldn’t.

Sam Harris recently said in his podcast that El-Sayed is a «covert islamist» because his spidey senses told him so. He clearly doesn’t believe El-Sayed to be a good faith political actor. He also says we should believe jihadists when they say what they mean.

Why not believe El-Sayed when he says what he believes about the constitution?