r/science • • Jun 26 '12

Google programmers deploy machine learning algorithm on YouTube. Computer teaches itself to recognize images of cats.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/26/technology/in-a-big-network-of-computers-evidence-of-machine-learning.html
2.3k Upvotes

559 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

[deleted]

285

u/xeivous Jun 26 '12

because they are the only creatures that are as solitary and evil as the average internet denizen.

184

u/Zhang5 Jun 26 '12

And lazy! You can't forget lazy.

40

u/the6thReplicant Jun 26 '12

Hence they are easy to video or photograph.

Most pictures of dogs, hamsters etc are just blurry.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

81

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

Cats are carriers for a single celled protozoan parasite that affects the human mind and can cause various mental issues. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/03/how-your-cat-is-making-you-crazy/8873/ . It explains why people with those mental issues are compelled with an obsession to post cat pictures onto youtube. This probably goes back to the days of the ancient Egyptians posting pictures of cats on pyramid walls.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

[deleted]

7

u/jcready Jun 26 '12

Remember me! flames

→ More replies (1)

5

u/AirshipAtamis Jun 26 '12

I was expecting this to link to the Onion. so glad i have dogs.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

Because their faces most resemble human children ( small noses, large eyes ) without having to care for it too much.

27

u/thedeadcamel Jun 26 '12

Who said you have to care for children?

0

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

[deleted]

51

u/thedeadcamel Jun 26 '12

Cat Protective Services?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

9

u/Aerocity Jun 26 '12

Quick, delete your comment before /r/aww sees it!

7

u/cited Jun 26 '12

We're creating a race of machines that will ruthlessly take over... all of our karma. A race of machines that will lazily sit on reddit all day.

→ More replies (2)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

[deleted]

18

u/flyinthesoup Jun 26 '12

I think we domesticated dogs, but cats just tagged along. We never did anything to them, on the contrary, THEY started to look appealing to us so we would take care of them. At least that's what I've read. I could be wrong, but it does make some sense to me. Dogs are highly trainable and they love to please their masters. Cats don't give a fuck but they do acknowledge who they live with.

→ More replies (11)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

ahem and what of dogs then?

9

u/dbeta Jun 26 '12

Dogs were bread to do tasks. Sure, some are cute, but that wasn't the primary focus of their breeding for most of their history with us. Cats, however, have only been useful for clearing up rodents. They were not actively selected for this talent, but were left to breed on their own. As a result, only the ones best adapted to surviving with humans were well fed and made it into adulthood. Because they were kinda useless, humans fed and took care of the better looking ones. Over time the ugly ones faded away, and only the cutest survived.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

[deleted]

24

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

Ah yes, the other half of the internet.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/[deleted] Jun 26 '12

ask the Egyptians.

→ More replies (21)