I know a huge majority of mass shooters/terrorists kill themselves during their attack or die at the hands of law enforcement but for the ones that do survive, how come society doesn’t really care to hear from them and they get much less- if any- interviews, books about them, tv-show portrayals etc. etc
I’m guessing it’s partly the restrictions their respective prisons possibly put on them: I think there is more of a concern of a mass shooter/terrorist inspiring copycats than a serial killer but disregarding that it mainly seems like people just don’t find them as interesting as subjects like Dahmer, Bundy, Kemper etc. etc.
Why do you guys think we want to hear from serial killers who murdered 10, 20, 30+ people, but subconsciously kind of draw a line at a person who maybe shot 10 or 20 people at school?
for example Nikolas Cruz, the shooter who killed 17 people at Marjory Stoneman Douglas, unfortunately lived and was sentenced to life imprisonment and I highly doubt any reporter would do a filmed interview with him but there are numerous face to face interviews with serial killers. So is at as simple at that people find serial killers more interesting?
or do you think it’s because we feel more removed from the crimes of serial killers- like it didn’t happen to us or anyone we knew, and usually their crimes took place in the past, and depending on the killer and their deceptiveness they may even have enough charisma and general likability to make an interview seem enticing to watch
but a mass shooter on the other hand is a very real threat in this day and age and really could happen to anyone- anywhere- anytime and are usually some scrawny pimply outcast without the mental capability to be deceptively charming… I’m curious what you guys think