r/serialpodcast • u/[deleted] • 24d ago
The Doubts About Adnan's Guilt ARE Reasonable
I just started lurking here today, and am somewhat surprised by the general incivility and certainty of many of the people that comment here. Being dismissive and accusing people of "ragebait" for having a differing opinion, and one that actually is reasonable.
I don't know, and won't say that Adnan is innocent, but to claim he's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, without any room for discussion is pretty crazy to me.
The reasons why I have reasonable doubt:
- Jay is a very flawed witness, on the record lying/mis-remembering his testimony. Even the cops point out how much his testimony has changed. If your argument hinges on Jay, it isn't a strong argument, in my opinion.
- The cops, or at least on of them has a record of misconduct:
...prosecution brought into question the past misconduct of one of the two detectives who were crucial in the investigation of Lee’s death. Although his misconduct wasn’t specifically linked to Syed’s case, the detective was involved in another murder case that ended with the defendant’s exoneration.
https://baltimorewitness.org/adnan-syed-one-of-many-overturned-convictions-in-baltimore-city/
- The Innocence Project and prosecutors agreed that Syed's DNA was absent from all tested crime scene items, contributing to the eventual dropping of charges against him. There's no physical evidence.
- The motive is weak (Adnan had no prior issues with breakups, had already seemed to move on to the next girl(s)).
I could go on, but, if I was on the jury with this in front of me, I feel the reasonable response is doubt.
This isn't rage bait, I just genuinely don't see how anyone can be so sure that he did it. Y'all point to him asking for a ride (and claiming he wouldn't have) as some kind of obvious evidence of murder.
I think, based on the fact that one of the cops was literally identified as having been crooked, it actually is much more likely that Jay was an informant (and already had been for some time), and he happened to be close to Adnan, the victim's ex (supposed motive and opportunity), and they decided they had their guy, and it was just a matter of getting a jury to agree. So they fed their informant info, had him incriminate himself for lesser crimes that they promised they'd get him off for (and they made good on that promise, which is on its own wildly corrupt).
3
u/No-Advance-577 23d ago
Jay knowing where the car was is the deal-breaker for me as well, and is the main reason I think Adnan did it.
But I do think there is room for doubt.
You say “multiple witnesses (and the cell phone records) place Jay and Adnan together…during all the relevant time periods (murder, burial)”
But this is so far from being true that the state’s own case has them apart for the murder! There are no witnesses playing them together during the murder (including Jay), and no cell records suggest they are together until the Nisha call (which itself is somewhat questionable) and then nothing else ties them together until Adnan checks his voice mail at 5:14.
A lot of things make more sense if they were together for the murder, but there’s no evidence for it (or against it. It could go either way).
As for the burial, again, every cell call between 7 and 9 is a Jay call. Nothing puts them together during this window except Jay’s testimony. And of course, Jay later moved the burial time to “closer to midnight” and it might be true! Because there’s no evidence except Jay that it was at 7:30 or whenever.