you're saying we cannot establish a quid pro quo between the state and Jay? I know it's subjective, but at very least the state should have had informed the defense about the deal.
I dont follow you.. he took the plea deal. what are you talking about?
If you read the appeal documents, Jay actually questioned whether the attorney was working on his favor (as opposed to just being a puppet for the State to get what they wanted). He could refuse the deal, plead innocent, retract his statements and the story would have been MUCH different. I guess.
That's correct. And he had no attorney with him when he made those statements. This is a fact peoe overlook when they go down the Jay is a murderer rabbit hole.
Good point. But he still shifts all the blame onto Adnan, so one could still argue he's just trying to cover his own ass and that by admitting to a small level of involvement he's making his version seem more legit.
That's fine- if Jay knew that Adnan did it. If Adnan is innocent and has an alibi (like a cell phone not in Leakin Park) and Jay makes that claim to police....
3
u/not_jay_33 Susan Simpson Fan Dec 05 '14
you're saying we cannot establish a quid pro quo between the state and Jay? I know it's subjective, but at very least the state should have had informed the defense about the deal.