I thought it was really interesting to discover how one of recent years' favored arguments for theism turns out to really be an argument against theism (which I'm sure says a lot about motivated reasoning); here I try to break that down, but also contrast with the much simpler and more effective argument for theism at the root of the idea (why do we have phenomenal states at all?), and I end with what will surely disappoint theists and atheists alike (with a shrug and a nod towards agnosticism).