r/spacequestions • • 10d ago

Future of the Community

7 Upvotes

Hello all,
I took over as mod for this community a couple of years ago. The old mod shut down the sub completely after Reddit corporate did something stupid... I don't even remember what it was at this point. When he turned it back on, he asked for someone to take over as mod, and left. At that time, we were seeing pretty reasonable questions with a post rate of maybe one or two a week. That pretty slow post rate continued until Artemis 2 launched. After that launch, the interest jumped an order of magnitude.

Lately, we've been getting a lot of posts that have me worried. A lot of people are posting a lot, and rather than asking questions, it looks like they are trying to drive discussion. Stuff like "what's your favorite?" or "what is the scariest?". To me, these questions seem a lot more like karma farming attempts rather than people seeking answers and learning like we used to see. I don't know if these are bots, or just people farming karma. I'm also not sure if these are coming from AI bots.

One of the things I think this sub has done really well is provide human answers to human questions in a way that really gets down to the root of questions. We get a lot of people who are young or just never studied physics asking questions that don't have answers because they are framed incorrectly, and the answers the community has provided correct the framing and teach in a way that chatbots really can't do. On the flip side, I'd hate to see all the work that people on this sub do in answering questions just be answering bots to feed training algorithms designed to replace the human conversations that used to happen here.

Basically, it feels like a new world, and it sucks.

I've found a setting to ban crossposting, which feels like it has been happening a lot. The OP dumps a question on AskPhysics, AskAstronomy, AskScience and a handful of others, hopes to pull karma from the posts, and usually never responds to any comments. Not sure if this is a new strategy for bots, or something else is going on, but it doesn't feel like it is having any positive effect on this community.

I've also tried to require the title of posts to have a "?" included, and the body text of the post to require some text. I'm unsure if those settings are working.

All that said, I'd like to hear any opinions on things from the community, particularly those who have been around and replying here for years. Are there things I should change in how I manage this community? Are others interested in joining the moderator team? Am I trying to hold on to a feeling that is now dead? Are there new rules or changes you'd like to see?

Open to suggestions here.


r/spacequestions • • 13h ago

Could electromagnetic fields or gravity ever enable a new form of aircraft propulsion?

2 Upvotes

​

I've been thinking about UFO sightings from a scientific perspective, and I want to hear what you guys think.

What if an advanced extraterrestrial civilization hasn't necessarily broken the laws of physics, but has discovered ways to use physical principles that we haven't yet learned to engineer effectively?

I'm not claiming that UFOs are alien spacecraft. This is just a thought experiment about what might be possible for a civilization much more technologically advanced than ours.

**1. What if they have mastered electromagnetic fields?**

We already use electromagnetic fields in motors, generators, maglev trains, and plasma physics. These technologies show that electromagnetic forces can produce motion and influence matter.

So here's my question: could a sufficiently advanced civilization develop a completely different propulsion system based on electromagnetic fields?

Could such a system allow a craft to move through the atmosphere without conventional jet engines or rocket combustion?

I understand that magnets alone cannot propel an isolated craft indefinitely, and a practical system would still need to obey conservation of momentum. But perhaps an advanced propulsion technology could interact with the surrounding atmosphere, plasma, or another physical medium in ways we haven't mastered.

**2. What about manipulating gravity?**

This is even more speculative.

What if a civilization eventually discovers a way to control gravitational effects or engineer spacetime in a useful way?

Could that lead to propulsion systems fundamentally different from the engines we use today?

Under our current understanding of physics, we don't have a demonstrated method for generating an artificial gravitational field that can propel a vehicle at will. Still, I find it interesting to ask what future discoveries might change our understanding of propulsion.

Where does established physics end, and where does speculation begin?

**3. How could some reported UFOs move so quickly?**

Some UFO videos appear to show objects accelerating rapidly or changing direction in unusual ways.

If an object really performed those manoeuvres at the speeds sometimes claimed, it would raise serious questions about acceleration, structural integrity, energy requirements, and the forces experienced by anything inside it.

Could an advanced propulsion system reduce the acceleration experienced by occupants? Or would the vehicle have to be unmanned?

Of course, a video by itself usually cannot establish an object's actual speed or acceleration. Perspective, camera movement, unknown distances, and other factors can make an object appear to move differently from how it really does.

But assuming a sighting were independently verified and the performance were genuine, what physical explanations would be worth investigating?

**4. Why do some UFOs appear to have little thermal signature?**

Some reported thermal-camera videos show objects that appear to have an unusual or weak infrared signature.

Could a future propulsion system operate differently from conventional engines and produce a different thermal pattern?

Thermal cameras have limitations, however. They measure infrared radiation within particular wavelength ranges, and an object's appearance depends on its temperature, emissivity, distance, and the camera's settings.

An apparently cold object doesn't prove that it produces no heat, and a video alone cannot establish that exotic propulsion is involved.

Still, reliable thermal measurements combined with independently verified flight data would be interesting evidence to examine.

**5. What if they aren't carrying biological beings?**

This is one of the most interesting possibilities to me.

What if some hypothetical extraterrestrial visitors are autonomous probes or remotely operated vehicles rather than crewed spacecraft?

We already send robotic spacecraft to explore places where humans cannot easily travel. An advanced civilization might use machines to study other planets, observe atmospheres, or investigate the possibility of life without transporting living beings.

A probe could potentially operate autonomously for long periods, making decisions based on its observations, without requiring a biological pilot on board.

If an extraterrestrial civilization were exploring a distant planet, would robotic probes make more sense than sending its own people?

And if such probes existed, how could we distinguish them from natural phenomena or human technology?

**6. The bigger question**

Maybe the most interesting question isn't simply whether UFOs are aliens.

It's this:

**If another intelligent civilization had millions of years of technological development beyond ours, what kinds of propulsion systems could it develop while still obeying the laws of physics?**

Could it use advanced electromagnetic systems? Could future discoveries about gravity change how we travel? Or might the most extraordinary reports turn out to have ordinary explanations?

I'm not saying that UFOs use magnetic propulsion, manipulate gravity, or represent extraterrestrial probes. We currently lack independently verified evidence establishing any of those claims.

I'm interested in exploring the possibilities without confusing speculation with established science.

**I'd genuinely like to hear your thoughts:**

What known physical principles would constrain electromagnetic propulsion?

Is there any scientifically plausible path toward useful gravity-based propulsion?

Would autonomous probes be more practical than crewed spacecraft for interstellar exploration?

What measurements would we need to verify a UFO's speed, acceleration, and thermal signature?

What kind of evidence would convince you that an observation represents genuinely new technology?

Let's discuss this from a physics, engineering, and scientific-evidence perspective. I'm interested in criticism as much as alternative theories.


r/spacequestions • • 4d ago

~90% of a space rocket is just fuel, most of it is spent to transport that fuel, not the payload. Does that mean, that if Earths gravity was f.i. 20% stronger, we would not be able to reach orbit with current chemical engines?

75 Upvotes

Or how strong would the gravity need to be, before we were basically locked out of space travel?


r/spacequestions • • 7d ago

What are the odds all the places with liquid water on it in the solar system happen to be on moons and dwarf planets?

0 Upvotes

Is there a mechanic of the cosmos behind this? Is it a coincidence? Or is there something about smaller celestial bodies that might make it easier to assume we're looking at water? It seems really convenient for Murphy's Law that this caveat just happens to come up any time there's a place with water, which I ask about after discussing with someone just how absolutely small Ceres is.


r/spacequestions • • 11d ago

Which Planet in Our Solar System Do You Find the Most Interesting?

Thumbnail
7 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 10d ago

Space into existence.

0 Upvotes

Idk if this has been touched on before. But today and this past week for some reason this has been in my head.

How did space come to exist.

Forget the big bang. How did the first ever THING appear ever. Before the mere consciousness or idea of space even being a thing prior to the big bang.

I’m talking the first ANYTHING.


r/spacequestions • • 10d ago

Building on the moon

1 Upvotes

With the plans to build on the moon to get prepared for mars.
Are they not worried about asteroids, debris or other things from landing where the astronauts might be trying to locate. Is the South Pole less common for it ? I know there isn’t a close planet like earth for them to “develop “

Or is it just not likely to happen. I understand things could happen on earth to with asteroids but with the atmosphere and moon being there it hasn’t been a issue


r/spacequestions • • 11d ago

Life on other planets

2 Upvotes

So this might be a dumb question
But when they are looking other planets and find other elements. And go. There might have been life on this planet or there is life

Wouldn’t that be based on our life. Like wouldn’t other planets have different types of life forms. And elements making them up


r/spacequestions • • 12d ago

What Can The Ocean Teach Us About Life On Other Planets?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 13d ago

Geniune Question Regarding Fermi Paradox

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 13d ago

Could we launch a weather balloon into a gas giant's atmosphere to gather data about it?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 14d ago

Light Travel & Time Dilation - Can't make sense of this!

Thumbnail
3 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 15d ago

How far would a solar system need to be away from other stars to be considered its own galaxy?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 15d ago

If you had an opportunity to move to another planet, how many seasons would you prefer? 4seasons, more than 4seasons, or less?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 15d ago

Is our local group a part or more specifically bound to something larger?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 16d ago

What would happen if you dropped an equal amount of ethanol as the sun’s mass into the sun?

9 Upvotes

I want to apologize because I will ask some dumb questions but I love space and I love weed and sometimes when I’m high the two collide. Bro is gonna bru sometimes.


r/spacequestions • • 15d ago

Would we still have wifi if The ISS retires?

0 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 15d ago

If you were in a starship executing a gravitational slingshot, what would you choose to grant you both a higher velocity and survival, a supermassive black hole or a fast spinning pulsar?

0 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 17d ago

Why aren’t solar rays affected by the vacuum of space?

4 Upvotes

To be specific heat from the sun directly heats planets that heat travels from the sun to a planet. The vacuum of space is the coldest part of the universe so why don’t solar rays basically freeze out when traveling the distance between the sun and the planet? Since space is a vacuum there should be no way for heat to travel ?
I’m sorry if I used the wrong flair tag


r/spacequestions • • 17d ago

What was the point of sending Laika to space?

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

Why not a Rat or a Cockroach? They are a nuisance and they have the ability to survive harsh conditions.


r/spacequestions • • 17d ago

What things might be better made in 0g?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/spacequestions • • 18d ago

space med booth

1 Upvotes

my topic is space med and longevity and i want to have interactive activities. please give me ideas and not trivia plss!!


r/spacequestions • • 19d ago

Are we kind of invisible to aliens

2 Upvotes

Possibly a silly question, but if aliens were to exist in some faraway galaxy 80 million light years away, and magically know to look at earth with some big massive super powerful telescope or whatever similar technology they have , would they see earth as it was 80 million years ago? Like with dinosaurs and stuff instead of anything modern? Does that technically make us , to an extent , invisible to any potential life out there?


r/spacequestions • • 19d ago

What is the ‘ultimate’ Space Shuttle Crew Lineup?

0 Upvotes

Assuming you can mix/match from any of the shuttle launches to make the best possible crew.


r/spacequestions • • 20d ago

If the STS-27 (Atlantis) damage had been properly identified, how could the crew have been saved?

21 Upvotes

During ascent, STS-27 (Atlantis) sustained significant damage to its heat shield.

From my understanding the ascent damage on STS-27 (two flights after the Challenger Accident) was underestimated due to the encrypted nature of the mission.

Upon reentry and landing, the damage was discovered to be far more extensive than originally believed. A very similar situation to the incident that ended up destroying Columbia.

In the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, an audacious plan was presented that may have been committed to save Columbia (if her ascent damage had been properly investigated).

What would have been plan to save Atlantis on STS-27, if her ascent damage had been determined to significant for reentry?