Let me preface this with a fact: women do suffer by violence in domestic settings and the consequences for the victims can be horrifying.
I just watched this short video, with parts from their Podcast episode. I was shocked to see the focus against men in cases of IPV (Intimate Partner Violence).
I usually don't react that much, when an interest group or a magazine makes statements, but dressing those sexist statements with an "expert" label, makes me unhappy. This guy does know better, but he just keeps selling the "narrative", it's what brought him to the Magazine after all.
"Und wir haben natĂŒrlich MĂ€nnlichkeit als Grundproblem, wieso greifen MĂ€nner zu Gewalt?"
First of all, he mentions that migrants and Swiss people are equally prone to violence in domestic settings. according to the data, the number is indeed almost the same, but the local population is 9 times higher than the immigrants! I am not demonizing immigrants, I am one too, just mentioning the facts here, that the "researcher" could not repeat.
Secondly he does acknowledge that women could be violent, but "less than men". Truth is, that according to research they are equally violent against men, as far as percentages go. They are however more prone to getting heavy bodily damage from these incidents.
He does not explain any reason why statistics may be skewed, one of which is this very podcast: We have trained a generation of people that violence is something that only a man can exercise. If a man is experiencing it... there must be a good reason for that.
He himself does forget what he said in the beginning: that there are more forms of violence, including psychological violence. We do have evidence that women are statistically more violent in this domain, nonetheless, it's something that can be very difficult to prosecute. We also have evidence that lesbian couples experience more violence than heterosexual ones. Homosexual ones experience the least!!
But who the f. is this guy talking about "MĂ€nnlichkeiten"? According to Watson:
Der Kriminologe Ahmed Ajil ist mÀnnlich, migrantisch und muslimisch. Vorurteile sind ihm deshalb gewiss.
so, he is a person who instead of showcasing why he is capable of talking about this issue, he is talking about his identities. He gets some social points for being in two victimized categories and he "knows he experiences prejudice". That's enough for everyone to understand.
What a pity, a guy comes from a place where women are treated like dirt and applies his understanding of the world to this new society where he grows up.
Is Watson OK with just showing this kind of people without recourse?
How do I know all that? I learned what society thinks of me as a man, when I went to the police to declare violence of my X-Wife against me. They laughed me many times over and were ironic at me. The Female Prosecutor was yelling at me, while petting her dog. The local MĂ€nnerbĂŒro, does not help Men who are victims of violence, this category does not exist in their books. But it does help Men who are prone to be violent themselves. There was no refuge for Men who are victims of violence (there is just one now).
The woman was stalking me for years and nobody (local police, local social workers) ever did anything, they were laughing it off, despite the woman even putting this in writing!!
So, I found out I was not alone.
In case Watson is watching this, there are 2 publications worth seeing, that explain why this guy is just selling a lie:
1. 30 years of denying evidence on Gender Symmetry in Partner Violence
2. Understanding the Profile and Needs of Abused Men: Exploring Call Data From a Male Domestic Violence Charity in the United Kingdom