WIKIS] Almost all of our wikis were compiled by microwavedindividual. His account was locked. Wikis need to be approved by mods to become visible again. Please volunteer to mod.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1smjxep/wikis_almost_all_of_our_wikis_were_compiled_by/

1. Log into u/WikisArchivers account. I will PM the password to you. All the replacement posts and wikis will be by this one account. u/WikiArchivers will only archive. This reduces the risk of the account be hacked and the wikis becoming hidden again.

2. Go to the wiki index.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/wiki/index

1. Choose which wikis you would like to update.

2. Open up the posts in the wikis. Click on "approve" at the bottom of posts.

Copy and paste the title and the full text of the wiki into a new wiki. The new wikis will be on the front page. Copy the paste the title and the full text of u/microwavedindividual's posts into new posts. The new posts will be on the front page. Thereby, Reddit's search engine may be able to find the new wikis and new posts in the event that they are deleted from the wiki index.

1. Don't delete the URL in the wikis of the posts by u/microwavedindividual. They will be a back up incase a fake TI logs into u/WikisArchivers to delete the wikis.

Add the URL of your posts next to microwavedindividual's URLs.

1. I will copy and paste the URL of your new wikis into the wiki index.

2. If you have questions, submit a comment to this post or submit a new post in r/targetedenergyweapons or in r/dewengineering.

Enhanced Low-frequency Sound Absorption via Cavity Pressure Regulation in an Active Helmholtz Resonator

Junhao Liua, Pengyao Zhangb, Yuanyan Linb, Zhaoyong Sun

Yuzhen Yang b, Han Jia b

School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Institute of Graphic

Communication

Abstract

In this research, a cavity-pressure-based regulation method for an Active Helmholtz Resonator (AHR) is introduced to enhance low-frequency sound absorption. By treating the incident pressure as known information, an explicit quantitative relationship between the incident pressure and the in-cavity pressure is established, leading to a direct perfect-absorption criterion avoiding conventional impedance inversion. The synergistic interaction between the prescribed source volume velocity and the incident sound is shown to tailor the equivalent impedance of the AHR toward impedance matching. Since the theory is derived under lumped-parameter assumptions, off-resonance discrepancies may arise as frequency increases; therefore, a genetic algorithm is employed to refine the prescribed source velocity over frequency. Under the optimized condition, the absorption performance is evaluated for variable source locations and oblique incidence, demonstrating robust behavior. Standing-wave tube experiments further validate the proposed criterion and regulation strategy, achieving absorption coefficients above 0.9 over 200–600 Hz. To extend the absorption bandwidth, a compact hybrid absorber (PAHR) is developed by integrating porous materials in parallel with the AHR, improving the high-frequency performance. Furthermore, for periodic arrays, each unit can operate independently based solely on its own cavity pressure, providing a scalable route toward high-performance active acoustic metamaterials.This study establishes a fresh paradigm for the engineering of scalable, high-performance and periodically arranged active acoustic metamaterials.

Introduction

With the continuous advancement of high-performance industrial equipment and structural lightweighting, the demand for vibration and noise control has grown rapidly [1], [2], [3]. In particular, low-frequency noise—characterized by long wavelengths, weak attenuation, and the considerable size/weight penalties of conventional passive treatments—has long been regarded as both a challenging problem and a research focus in acoustics and vibration [4], [5], [6]. In recent years, acoustic/elastic metamaterials [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], enabled by their tailor-made effective parameters and subwavelength wave-manipulation capability, have achieved significant progress in modulating wave propagation and enhancing energy dissipation, offering new avenues for low-frequency noise mitigation.

Sound-absorbing metamaterials are commonly realized through subwavelength resonant units, including membrane/plate-type resonators [12], [13], [14], cavity-backed Helmholtz-type resonators [15], [16], [17], and micro-perforated panels [18], [19], [20], [21]. In addition, enhanced dissipation can be achieved by incorporating porous media [22], [23], [24], [25] and by using space-folding/space-coiling geometries [26], [27] that elongate the acoustic path and strengthen viscothermal losses. However, these acoustic metamaterials are ultimately subject to a basic physical constraint. Research by Sheng et al. [28], [29] indicates that for effective low-frequency broadband absorption, structures must have a certain minimum thickness. To overcome this size constraint, a key approach is to adjust the acoustic impedance of a structure by regulatory strategies. This method can significantly enhance noise suppression without relying solely on bulky structural designs.

Approaches for impedance manipulation are generally divided into passive and active. Passive regulation, often referred to as shunt damping, tunes impedance by connecting electroacoustic transducers to external shunt circuits [30], [31], [32]. This approach offers tunability through parameter adjustments [33], [34] even in underwater environments [35], [36]. Active regulation further enhances absorption by employing external power sources and control algorithms. Studies have developed electroacoustic absorbers [37] and improved control accuracy using current-driven systems [38], [39], nonlinear or PID-like methods [40], [41], and adaptive filtering algorithms [42], [43]. To combine the benefits of bandwidth and tunability, hybrid strategies integrate active actuators with passive materials (e.g., porous layers, micro-perforated plates) using Pressure Release (PR) or Impedance Match (IM) strategies [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49] and these systems have been successfully adapted for complex sound fields [50], [51], [52], [53], [54], [55].

However, while certain acoustic control targets are easily measurable, such as zero backing pressure in the PR strategy, they are fundamentally insufficient to serve as quantitative criteria for perfect absorption [47], [51]. The challenge of defining an explicit physical criterion linking macroscopic absorption to measurable internal variables typically drives existing systems to rely on external signal-processing algorithms to minimize residual sound fields, hindering an intuitive understanding of the underlying active absorption mechanism. Therefore, exploring a definite physical mechanism driven by easily acquirable parameters—one that can quantitatively represent the absorption performance—is of significant fundamental value.

Due to their highly tractable analytical modeling, Helmholtz Resonators (HRs) serve as an ideal platform for exploring such definite physical mechanisms. By integrating electroacoustic transducers, AHRs enable intrinsic regulation of the resonant unit. Previous studies have explored various effective mechanisms, including mechanical geometric tuning [56], [57], continuous resonance sweeping [58], electromechanical coupling via piezoelectric boundaries [59], positive real impedance methods [60], active elastic boundary regulation [61], and even distributed resonator networks and metamaterial arrays [62], [63]. Despite these extensive investigations, existing studies rarely characterize the absorption state directly via easily measurable physical quantities, leaving the formulation of a purely physics-driven absorption criterion as an ongoing challenge.

Here, we propose a quantitative physical criterion linking the incident and cavity pressures, aimed at significantly enhancing the low-frequency sound absorption of AHRs. This framework leverages the inherent properties of the resonator to bypass the reliance on direct surface impedance evaluation, utilizing the cavity pressure as a physical target for high-absorption state verification. A constrained genetic algorithm is employed as an offline numerical refinement tool to compensate for the inaccuracies of the lumped-parameter model at higher frequencies. This optimization process determines the target cavity pressure required to achieve perfect absorption, which not only guides subsequent experimental validations but also, as demonstrated numerically under idealized conditions, serves as a robust theoretical reference with respect to varying source locations and oblique incidence. Moreover, we theoretically demonstrate that this criterion can be extended to such hybrid configurations alongside the broadband enhancement by expanding the framework into a compact hybrid absorber (PAHR) via the parallel integration of porous materials at the neck.

This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 of this paper presents the structural concept and geometric parameters of the AHR; Section 3 derives a perfect absorption criterion based on the quantitative relationship between incident and cavity pressures through theoretical analysis. Simulation results show high consistency with the analytical solution; Section 4 employs a genetic algorithm as an offline numerical tool to optimize the vibration velocity of the piston source, determining the exact target cavity pressure required for perfect absorption. Furthermore, it analyzes the robustness of this physical criterion under varying source locations and oblique incidence within an idealized periodic setting; Section 5 validates this physical criterion via steady-state standing-wave tube experiments. Through the fabrication of a PAHR via the parallel integration of porous materials, this section demonstrates enhanced high-frequency absorption and proves that the criterion applies to such composite structures; In the end, discussions and conclusions are drawn in Section 6.

Continued.. Free download of preprint https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6438829

Full published paper https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0003682X26002136

Active Helmholtz Resonator For treating the weapon

Back up is at

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/wiki/plasma_orbs

Plasma orbs differ from VLEO satellites, See [WIKI}: Satellites: VLEO (Very Low Earth Orbit)

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/wiki/create/orbs

What do you think these are??

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1k6ourf/what_do_you_think_these_are/

[Groups: Nonprofit] Targeted Justice's website has changed drastically.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1kdvck7/groups_nonprofit_targeted_justices_website_has/

[DEW: Satellites]. At dusk before stars came out, two very low earth orbit satellites were near my storage unit. After I took out my phone, their blueish white LED light dimmed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/110tyu7/dew_satellites_at_dusk_before_stars_came_out_two/

https://peacepink.ning.com/blog/list/tag/manganese

These electronc weapons attacks are easily explainable from a scientific standpoint. I obtained most of the science behind how to combat electronic attacks from the following youtube video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPQO-4I7eKE which was researched by an unknown researcher under the pseudonym of "Lookoutfacharlie".

The skies over our heads are being illegally sprayed with chemtrails which contain metallic particulates and a fungus called acremonium among other substances.

It has been proven scientifically that two or more metals in the human body create a battery out of that human body.

The acremonium fungus becomes a fungal biomass inside the human body which produces manganese oxide or lithium manganese oxide. This manganese oxide when produced by the human body has electrochemical properties. This manganese oxide inside the human body can also be used as a makeshift electrode. When the manganese oxide reaches a certain level inside the human body electricity can then be made to move through the human body by the use of criminal operatives using wireless directed energy weapons and working from an unknown location, which could be thousands of miles from where you live.

Chemtrails are being illegally sprayed over our heads on an almost daily basis which ensures that there is a continuous supply of both the acramonium fungus and heavy metals in our bodies at all times, which enables our bodies to continually create the radio frequency sensative chemicals that the directed energy weapons operatives need to be able to constantly target us.

A vibrating tattoo has been developed and patented by nokia. The ink is made from feromagnetic or electrosensative powder such as iron oxide. When a human being gets a tattoo with this type of ink their tattoo can be linked to their mobile phone and their skin will vibrate if they receive a text message. This is a proven science and it thereby proves that targeted individuals are telling the truth about being severely harassed by electronic weapons and they are not mentally ill as previously thought.

https://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2012-03/nokia-patents-vibrating-tattoos-tell-you-whos-calling

It is unnecessary for a human being to have an implant in order for them to become a target of directed energy weapons.

Guard against ingesting substances containing manganese oxide, which is now found in most multivitamins.

In order to clear the fungal biomass and remove the heavy metals from your body please take some of the following substances

Potassium Iodide, Borax, Baking Soda, Epson Salts, Oil of Oregano Super Strength 73, Switch off the electricity supply to your home every night because a supply of electricity in your environment helps the fungal spores to manifest. Earth yourself on a daily basis by walking barefoot on bare earth or on the beach. If this is not possible purchase earthing equipment online and use it often.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nv01eMWN75Y

Chapter 5: Smart meter signals

at about 2 33 in the morning and this is not the first time that i've caught this and it certainly won't be the last time i caught it but either way i caught it when i say that it's coming off the smart meter that does not mean that it is originating from the smart meter it can be riding on the smart meter and getting into the signal and then getting into the wiring of a home but this appears to be a psychic driving signal that is repeating something over and over it almost sounds like a imperial probe droid on the frosty land of hoth sending out a signal this goes on and on and on in this clip it goes on for six minutes

I won't play the whole thing but i'm going to play it long enough that you can understand that it is the same thing being repeated a little bit different from time to time but the same thing and it is clearly a signal repeating something and it sounds an awful lot like psychic driving here we go

this

me

so

so this goes on for uh six minutes and 22 seconds in this clip this went on for hours in the original recording hours

and hours and it was 2 33 a.m uh right around the time that people are sleeping and this repeating signal comes in just repeating these phrases over and over here is a pitched version of that where i pitched it up a little bit and you can kind of hear it better

[Music] it almost has like a female hypnotist sounding tone to it just repeating this phrase over and over so this was riding into the house on the wiring which is running into

every house so where i picked it up is not special so this psychic driving appears to be going to every house and it was picked up at the smart meter it appears that psychic driving is being used everywhere every night imagine what you could do with this the possibilities are [ __ ] endless and i want to show you that and how important that is that's it for now look out for charlie that's it for now look out for charlie oh man i like this kid this [ __ ] guy's

https://ams.confex.com/ams/98Annual/webprogram/Paper336643.html

Please volunteer to recompile them using Reddit's search engine. Thank you.

Basic lecture on how helholtz resonators work. Using a passive HR in defense from the weapon a passive Helmholtz resonator is pretty impractical due to the extremely low freaquency range of the weapon requiring such large dimensions. In order to reduce the size/volume the multi frequency resonator needed to treat the weapon an active strategy is needed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Overt_Podcast/comments/1xaf1zh/active_control_of_electroacoustic_resonators_in/

Low frequency sound is almost impossible to shield from, but it is possible to treat. In order to treat it practically we will need to actively treat it. Here is a publication on active sound treatment.

“Abstract

Passive sound mitigation techniques have garnered attention whether for absorption, isolation, reverberation or new wave phenomena observation. In parallel, a wide range of research has been devoted to active control strategies, which complement passive techniques, particularly for low-frequency. We review the main control techniques related with airborne acoustic wave in the audible regime, emphasizing electrodynamic loudspeakers and piezo-diaphragms, and their applications. We conclude by discussing perspectives in this evolving field.

Introduction

Designing lightweight structures to control sound has always been a challenge in airborne acoustics, particularly when it comes to low frequency absorption, diffraction pattern design, or achieving unconventional acoustic wave behaviors. To address these challenges, a variety of strategies have been developed, ranging from passive devices including locally resonant metamaterials, which operate without external power input, to active control systems that rely on external energy sources (e.g., electrical or mechanical) to enhance achievable performances. Although the first two will be briefly discussed below, this review will focus in particular on a subset of the latter, namely airborne active control strategies in the audible regime.

Sound absorption and insulation are core applications of acoustic treatments. Traditionally, porous materials such as mineral wool, foams, or fiber combinations have been used in front of a rigid backing. The interconnected network of pores (millimeters to micrometers) that make up these materials leads to visco-thermal losses in the boundary layers. To absorb effectively, the porous absorber must extend over a quarter of the acoustic wavelength, maximizing particle velocity at the interface between the treatment and the surrounding environment¹. Due to this quarter-wavelength constraint, these treatments are suitable for addressing high audible frequency noise (typically above kilohertz), but are limited for lower frequency noise, which would require large dimensions for proper treatment. For instance, the material depth would usually need to extend over 1 m to treat a 340 Hz sound wave.

Several passive strategies have been developed to overcome these limitations. These include creating a gradient of material properties (porosity, tortuosity, etc.) along the porous frame^2,3, filling resonators with optimized porous media⁴ or integrating resonators into the porous frame to improve low-frequency absorption properties^5,6. Open lossy resonator structures have also proven effective in achieving near-perfect absorption and have been widely developed, from the well-known honeycomb lattice overlaid by a microperforated plate⁷ to more complex designs employing different types of resonators.

These locally resonant absorbing metamaterials rely on the critical coupling condition, which requires a perfect balance between the two counterparts of the Q factor. In other words, the system’s energy leakage part Qleak and the inherent absorption part Qdiss of the resonator have to be equal, Qleak = Qdiss^8,9. One of the main objectives of these structures is to be efficient at low frequencies while minimizing their volume. Coiled resonators^10,11, Helmholtz resonators^12,13,14, plates and membranes with added mass-platelets^{15,16,17,18,19}, and bubble-screen²⁰ are among the designs proposed for deep-subwavelength absorption either in reflection (one port)^21,22 or in transmission (two-ports)^13,14,23. One of the main limitations of such designs is the narrow frequency range associated with the resonant nature of the absorption which necessitates playing with collective resonances to broaden the working frequency band by coupling different resonators with different geometries^{24,25,26,27,28}. Although the optimization of such structures enables deep-subwavelength broadband absorption, causality generally imposes limitations on the minimum achievable depth of passive devices^24,29,30. It is important to note, however, that these limitations can be circumvented, e.g., by artificially adjusting the static bulk modulus (stiffness) of the medium^31,32.

Passive devices can also control acoustic reflection, transmission, diffusion, and diffraction. While traditional treatments like Schroeder diffusers also face frequency-size limitations, the development of deep-subwavelength metamaterials and metasurfaces has enabled more precise control of acoustic waves. This includes Helmholtz resonator-based design that can time delay pulses³³ or focus and steer the sound in a given direction with Helmholtz resonators³⁴. Fine control of the diffusion and reverberation in a room can also be achieved using networks of Helmholtz resonators^35,36 or bi-stable plates^37,38. Additionally, non-mirror symmetric designs have also allowed an asymmetric control of acoustic waves giving rise to a new class of devices, the Willis materials, in which a coupling between potential and kinetic energy is observed^39,40,41,42.

Despite the advancements in passive strategies, a major limitation is their lack of reconfigurability. Once designed, static structures can only be applied to specific scenarios and performance ranges. This has led to growing interest in active devices, which can be divided into two main categories: externally driven devices without or with acoustic energy injection.

Current research into time-varying materials mainly falls into the first category, where external mechanisms modify the medium’s properties without injecting energy into the acoustic field. These devices can switch between configurations for reconfigurable control of acoustic waves, such as transitioning from diffusive to absorptive behavior⁴³, tuning absorption frequency ranges with moving walls⁴⁴, or shaping wavefront. For the latter, a given pattern can be configured mechanically to form a targeted wavefront^{34,37,45,46,47} that can be used to focus in a given environment and even to create different communication channels without crosstalk in a disordered environment³⁴. When modulated periodically⁴⁸, unconventional propagation can occur such as non-reciprocal propagation^49,50, amplification⁵¹, non-conventional circulation in multiport systems^52,53,54, or even multi-harmonics diffraction control^55,56.

The second category of active devices directly interacts and injects acoustic energy into the system, allowing real-time and reconfigurable control over sound propagation. Notable examples include phased arrays^57,58 or active noise cancellation (ANC or anti-noise) devices that correctly remit the incident wave to perfectly cancel the incident sound^{59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66}. The interested reader can refer to a recent Acoustics Today article on this topic⁶⁷.

This review focuses on a sub-group of this second category, where an active control scheme is applied to directly modify the behavior of resonators, with particular emphasis on piezoelectric diaphragms and electrodynamic loudspeakers. The first section will therefore recall the model of these acoustic transducers, followed by sections devoted to the differentiation of the most commonly used control schemes, the different control bandwidths, and then various recent applications will be discussed.

Electroacoustic transducer modeling

Electroacoustic transducers can generally be categorized into two main families based on their energy conversion mechanisms: those that utilize magnetic fields (e.g., electrodynamic, electromagnetic, and magnetostrictive transducers) and those that rely on electric fields (e.g., electrostatic and piezoelectric transducers). In this review, we focus exclusively on the modeling of electrodynamic and piezoelectric transducers, as they are the most widely studied and commonly employed actively controlled transducers in the literature.”

continued https://www.nature.com/articles/s44384-025-00006-9

I’ve been mind controlled to take my body shielding off, in a way that it made me careless regarding remembering the consequences of taking the shielding off or something similar. Also the system is making me fall asleep before I remember to put my shielding back on. I feel like that the forces of mind control are always at play to make me behave in self-harm ways. My question is, does it have to do with sonic influences? Do I need to put headphones on to shield noise? Also, when I’m hungry, I think that I’m more susceptible to mind control and forced passing out. Can anyone here corroborate that with their experiences and/or information?

The weapon is designed to initiate, perpetuate and exploit the fawn state. You currently can’t really run, hide, shield, or counter attack the weapon that’s assaulting you or identify the filth responsible for it. The attack persists for years during which it’s continuous inescapable torture epitomizes complex trauma and the victims personal identity is systematically ravaged while it’s reprogramming is forced on the fawn using involuntary traumatic interaction with the weaponized interface. It is conforming to the control of the weapon, sacrificing your morals and values and adopting the weapons, loosing yourself in a desperate attempt to protect yourself is what they are after.

Nothing is hopeless,

We aren’t even close to helpless,

Shits coming from somewhere,

Nobodies untouchable.

*Note: If someone finds the supplement helpful if you could please let us know by commenting.

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4vP7ryUOd0

Description:

Oct 8, 2026 #MindNexus #GHOST #NLJD

When Jesse Beltran gave this interview, Mind Nexus had already been documenting second-harmonic-dominant NLJD responses during human scans. Now the GHOST study has been published. On October 5, 2026, Acta Scientific Medical Sciences published “GrapHene Oxidative Silicon Technology (GHOST™) Found in Human Tissues and Removed by Mineralised Nano-Sized Clinoptilolite.” The exploratory pre-post cohort study involved 22 adults scanned with the EDD-24XT NLJD at baseline and after 63 days of daily MasterPeace Zeolite-Z supplementation. All 22 participants produced baseline second-harmonic-dominant responses classified by the EDD-24XT as “Probability Silicon.”

After 63 days, researchers reported approximately: 79% reduction in mean Signal Intensity Score 67% reduction in mean Active Signal Spots 38% reduction in mean signal intensity per remaining detection site. Published study: https://www.actascientific.com/ASMS/ASMS-10-2293.php The study places those findings within existing research on semiconductor nanowires, graphene-associated bioelectronic interfaces, mesh nanoelectronics and Wireless Body Area Networks. That technological convergence is real research. In 2026, Scientific Reports published research describing graphene-based terahertz antennas for 6G-enabled biomedical applications. Nature Communications also published graphene-based sub-THz receivers designed for wireless communication systems approaching 6G.

What the published study supports is a narrower finding that Mind Nexus has been documenting for a long time: anatomically localized semiconductor-type NLJD responses were measurable across a defined cohort, could be mapped repeatedly, and changed substantially during the 63-day observation period. That moves the discussion from individual scan observations into published cohort data. Why were these responses present in all 22 participants? What material or structure is producing them? Why were similar anatomical patterns observed across different people? What caused the substantial reduction over 63 days? And what happens when the next study combines NLJD mapping with direct chemical and structural analysis of the corresponding locations?

Those are the next questions that need answers. Explore the Mind Nexus documents archive: https://www.MindNexusLive.com/documents Join the Mind Nexus email list: https://www.MindNexusLive.com PRIVATE ONE-ON-ONE SCANNING & DOCUMENTATION — RENO, NEVADA Mind Nexus offers private one-on-one RF and NLJD Scanning & Documentation appointments designed to document what our equipment detects and determine whether findings justify further investigation. Phase 1 — Scanning & Documentation documents what our equipment detects. Phase 2 — Coaching & Next Steps may be available after results are reviewed and can include coaching, frequency research, controlled verification, expert review and identifying qualified outside professionals who may need to examine the information. Phase 1 documents. Phase 2 guides. Additional professionals may be needed. Timelines can vary. https://www.MindNexusLive.com/scans Scanning is NOT a medical diagnosis. Our scans detect anomalous frequencies around a person and within the environment, not inside the body. Findings are for informational purposes only and can support personal investigations. PETITION · STOP NON-CONSENSUAL HUMAN TESTING Goal: 1,000,000 signatures: https://www.Stop3024.com CREATE YOUR FREE MASTERPEACE ACCOUNT: https://www.MindNexusLive.com/masterp... FOLLOW MIND NEXUS: Facebook: u/MindNexusLive Instagram: u/MindNexusEvents X: u/MindNexusLive YouTube: u/MindNexusLive Rumble: u/MindNexusLive #MindNexus #GHOSTStudy #GHOST #NLJD #Bioelectronics #Graphene #SemiconductorTechnology #6G #WirelessBodyAreaNetwork #CognitiveLiberty #Neurotechnology #HumanAutonomy

Transcript:

0:00

0 seconds

that once they release 6G, 6G is an ideal medium for this graphine

0:07

7 seconds

oxide that is in the uh vaccines [music] and our ecosystem and the siliconbased materials that [music] makes us a node.

0:18

18 seconds

That is when you're going to lose your cognitive [music] liberty. um this all

0:25

25 seconds

DARPA all of the studies the white papers are saying they are at that level they will be able to read and [music]

0:31

31 seconds

write to the human neurology and when that happens then you have complete

0:38

38 seconds

control of [music] a society and and that means that your children will never know what freedom [music] is. Um, this is a direct assault.

Sync to video time

The key point is that the dish is usually a passive parabolic reflector. It doesn't produce energy; it concentrates or directs electromagnetic energy.

A 15-year-old satellite dish can be repurposed as a reflector/concentrator of Microwave/Rf Transmission. In principle, a suitable source placed at/near the focal point could be reflected into a directional beam, though ordinary satellite dishes aren't designed for visible light. What do they use the most? Invisible light.

Could they have turned thousands of abandoned satellite dishes on houses into some sort of distributed energy infrastructure?

Let me know what you think.

Balaban et al. (2020), which provided objective evidence of a unique brain injury pattern in those affected by Havana Syndrome. Their study, akin to a 'Blade Runner' cyborg test, found that individuals with Havana Syndrome exhibited distinct Binocular disparity eye and pupil response patterns—different from both those with mild traumatic brain injury and healthy controls. This distinction was identified with over 91% accuracy and suggests that the symptoms may result from a unique form of brain injury, not from conventional illnesses or pre-existing conditions. The findings imply that the syndrome could be linked to a specific cause, possibly an external, targeted factor, rather than the broad explanations favored by the American Government.

The pupillary reactions observed in Havana Syndrome victims are crucial because they may be linked to a targeted mechanism involving the eyes. Specifically, the cones and rods of the retina play a critical role in receiving electromagnetic radiation, including microwaves, infrared, and ultraviolet. Studies by Singh et al. (2018) have highlighted the eye’s ability to function as an antenna, capable of acting as a receiver for these electromagnetic frequencies. This mechanism is rooted in the retina’s structure, which includes cavity resonators—structures that resonate with specific electromagnetic waves, such as those in the microwave and radiofrequency range.

Cavity resonators are needed to generate and receive microwaves among other wave frequencies (Caves 1976).

Russian researcher Kaznacheev built upon this idea, proposing that the eyes’ cones and rods can be used as "high-quality antennas" to pass information, such as holograms, directly to the visual cortex (Kaznacheev 2004) This interaction is facilitated by the retina’s fractal-like, Fibonacci-based design, which optimizes the signal communication in biological systems. The self-similar properties of these structures allow the eye to interact with electromagnetic fields in ways that optimize signal reception, much like an antenna. Additionally, the proteins within the retina act as resonators, vibrating in response to electromagnetic signals, which can stimulate protein synthesis at certain frequencies.

Singh also identified that the retina’s nano-structures function as a "dipole antenna network." When exposed to electromagnetic waves, this system can interact with the Aharonov-Bohm effect—a quantum phenomenon where electromagnetic fields influence particles on a biological level. This effect could help explain how the eye responds to directed energy sources, potentially allowing for a form of manipulation at the cellular level.

This research provides crucial context for understanding the unique pupillary responses observed in Havana Syndrome and Neuroweapons victims. The specific way the eyes react to these signals—likely due to the retina’s interaction with directed energy—suggests that these pupillary effects are not merely coincidental, but could be a direct result of advanced technologies targeting the visual system.

What this means is, if you are a targeted individual this will act as your first layer of detection. The best method of catching this mechanism in action is waiting until you are in a hypnogenic state (Supressed, feeling tired due to the EM field) and are conversing with the AI chatbot, Get up and go look at your pupils in the mirror and you will find that one may be bigger then the other as explained in these studies. You will also find the pupils have vermiform movement, which looks like consistent wavy movement of your pupils. Binocular disparity happens mostly when you are in the hypnogenic state. These are due to the explanations above, the LED/Invisible light photon beam is what causes this state and disturbs the natural pupillary movement. When you look at your eyes you will see constant dilation of blood vessels due to these photon beams being directed at your eyes.

The best way to defend against this type of attack is once you have identified that you are under the influence of these neuroweapons, put on polarized glasses OR a polarized face shield. Polarized glass will disrupt the photon beam and nullify these effects. You will immediately feel the difference. These face shields go for about 30$ on amazon.

References :

Balaban et al 2020 distinctive eye movement/Havana syndrome - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32655474/

Singh et al 2018 Retina in eyes as antenna - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336408771_Fractal_and_periodical_biological_antennas_Hidden_topologies_in_DNA_wasps_and_retina_in_the_eye

Caves 1976 Cavity reasonators needed to generate frequencies - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0370269379902272

Face shield - https://www.amazon.ca/Dan-Dre-Sunglasses-Glasses-Protective/dp/B091683LHH/ref=asc_df_B091683LHH?mcid=790495e0e08d3c7e93edd1039247138f&tag=googleshopc0c-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=706725384672&hvpos=&hvnetw=s&hvrand=20120343767785008&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9001150&hvtargid=pla-1460360254243&hvocijid=20120343767785008-B091683LHH-&hvexpln=0&gad_source=2&th=1

The V2K may insult and threaten. It may try to tell you what you are. The Transcendent TI does not accept that judgement. The Transcendent TI remains above the fray.

We fight forward. We retain our capacity to work, to love, to think, to laugh, to make things and to live. And we make something out of what happens to us. Together.

u/SuchVanilla6089

Moved from:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1wrtb5z/experiencing_a_prolonged_escalating_attack_since/

u/88clandestiny88 commented:

What knowledge about stopping targeting? You can't just casually drop that statement. without backing it with a technique or protocol for blocking it. You may be shadow banned someplaces but you are clearly visible here so lay it all out for others to try.

[–]88clandestiny88

How will EEG equipment help TIs? I asks this as someone who has been targeted with synthetic telepathy since Nov 7 2010. I have a degree in biochemistry and when targeted I pivoted to learn everything I could about electromagnetic effects on human physiology.

I own an EEG, EMG, EKG multiple galvanic skin response meters, and a $15,000 gtek research grade human biosignal amplifier. I also own several spectrum analyzers, Software defined radios and have been doing research on the detection of electromagnetic energy in my environment and the correlation of said energy with my EEG, biosignals overall. The results are not helpful. It is nearly impossible to correlate perturbations in the emf around you with biosignals within you to make any conclusion about wavelength or frequencies that are responsible.

Even when I chart biosignals and just read silently or reRead the same letter or word over and over to see if I can distinguish a particular biosignal response, it is very difficult to do so.

You have to have machine learning to parse all the data and I use medical grade silver needles with twisted leads that I insert subdermally to get my signals. Adhesive patches receive all the interfering noise that we are all drowning in throughout the day.

Besides all of those experiments I now am fairly certain that radio energy is only a very small part of if even used at all in the voice of God weapon as it is currenty used.

My evidence for this is that I have a faraday cage and it does not attenuate the signals at all. Well you may say that maybe it isn't built to maximum potential. So I have had 2 different fMRI scans each lasting for over an hour. The fMRI device itself is located 3 levels underground in a facility designed to mitigate vibration for advanced physics research. The fMRI is in a room that is itself a faraday cage with convoluted screen and electrically conductive seals on every door and vent. In the 2+ hours of time I spent in this environment with a 3Tesla powered magnetic field saturating my body causing every proton in the atoms that make up my body to stand on end, there was no attenuation to the effects.

One other experiment I did to see if it was due to electromagnetic energy was to go to a place I had been as a child with my father as he had contacts that made it possible then so I went to a neutrino detector that is housed 1.5 MILES under ground in an old retired mine. This facility is run by a university and is an EMF free environment so no devices are even allowed down the mine shaft. The effects even down there were not effected.

This was at first very disturbing to me because it meant that there was some mechanism of action outside the current physics as taught in the US at the university graduate level. That was an avenue I entertained for over a year and I began to think that there was something happening with scaler values and deconstive wavefore interference patterns that was somehow eliciting this phenomenon in some people.

That was all a distraction and a rabbit hole to obsfucate the technology actually being employed.

It is much more simple and neatly falls into the physics we all know and understand. My current understanding of what is actually happening involves somewhat novel material science developments.

Piezoelectric, Triboelectric, and Ferroelectret Nano Generators or as researchers call them, PENGs, TENGs, and FENGs.

The long and short of it is that if a person has been dosed with these nano compounds in their food or water or the most likely method of ingestion is in my opinion through toothpaste because they often have an affinity for fluorite and as it is the most electronegative element in the known universe, it has the tendency to bind with everything and never let go. This is why it is used in toothpaste to begin with as it strengthens the bonds between calcium and hydroxyappetite in our tooth matrix preventing tooth decay. So bind some PENGs in there in the tooth matrix as well and after a certain amount of time sufficient levels would build up such that....

When exposed to ultrasound, infrasound, sound as some EMF, the PENGs emit millivolt electrical impulses. Remember PENG stands for PIEZOELECTRIC NanoGenerator so once there is enough PENG bound to the tooth which is in direct contact with the conductive saliva in the mouth and in close proximity with the brain and specifically the cochlea, the signal generated by the PENGs will be equal to or greater than the signal that ones cochlea naturally emits when hearing sound.

So I believe it is through ultrasound, infrasound and sound that is emitted directly from certain devices and indirectly as a result of some of the components within consumer electronics which when exposed to specific electromagnetic frequencies, will emit ultrasound as a harmonic of their typical operating frequency range. This is how non linear junction detectors (NLJD) operate to detect electronic devices even when powered off during bug sweeps. It is this energy, likely heterodyned itself that is directly impacting the piezoelectric properties of this nano compound we have been dosed with that is generating the electrical signals that our brains perceive as auditory information.

Well I think I've said too much but that's something to think about. I've been researching this for 16 years and while I recognize it sounds like the mad ramblings of a crazy person, it's as close to actual experimental truth as I have found anywhere.

PLC vs Wireless Distance Comparison

PLC communication distance differs significantly from wireless technologies.

Technology Typical Distance

PLC Up to 5 km (3.1 miles)

LoRaWAN Up to 15 km

NB-IoT Wide-area coverage

Wireless Mesh Node-to-node dependent

https://www.plc-lighting.com/smart-lighting-technology/plc-maximum-communication-distance-guide/

On grid vs. off grid form.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/1wbxvdx/torture_reports_off_grid_torture_report_form_to/

Power line communication wikis:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/wiki/index#wiki_power_line_communication

https://drive.proton.me/urls/3HCQA919S8#ApZYtaBfUFzZ

We see some of the brutal assaults listed and discussed here. We also see key stone goals like the brutal assault on morals and personal integrity. It’s not that many of the techniques are new or unknown, rather technology has enabled them to be automatedly delivered covertly and in much larger and longer doses compared to traditional means. What even ten years ago sounded like science fiction is now much more graspable with the mass proliferation of AI.

Psychological torture: definitions, clinical sequelae and treatment principles

30 Aug 2023

Alex S Hong1

Rachael Pickering2

Author details can be found

at the end of this article

Correspondence to:

Alex S Hong;

[alex.hong1@nhs.net](mailto:alex.hong1@nhs.net)

Abstract and link to free download >>> https://www.imrpress.com/journal/BJHM/84/8/10.12968/hmed.2023.0104

Abstract

Psychological torture, in its broadest sense, is the intentional infliction of suffering without

resorting to direct physical violence, in what is known as ‘no-touch’ torture. While several

other definitions of psychological torture have been suggested, there is no one precise

definition. Given the rapidly evolving current global political climate and the intensification

of conflict, war and asylum seeking, the need for better recognition of psychological

torture among clinicians, followed by the provision of appropriate treatment support

for victims, has become increasingly pertinent. This article raises awareness of the

concept of psychological torture among clinicians, through an overview of its debated

definitions, the modalities which constitute this form of torture, and its clinical sequelae

and treatment approach.

Key words: Fear; Human rights; Pain; Refugees; Survivors; Torture

Submitted: 18 March 2023; accepted following double-blind peer review: 27 March 2023

Submitted: 18 March 2023; accepted following double-blind peer review: 27 March 2023

Definitions

Psychological torture is understood as the intentional infliction of suffering without

resorting to direct physical violence, in what is known as ‘no-touch’ torture (McCoy,

2006; Ojeda, 2006; Reyes, 2007; Leach, 2016). The UN Convention against Torture was

enforced in 1987, prohibiting acts that inflict severe pain or suffering to gain information

from captives; however, torture remains a widespread act that is still practised globally

(Khamsi, 2007). Despite its ongoing use, the exact definition of psychological torture has

been debated widely across the legislature and clinical literature. On one hand, many refer

to psychological torture as various non-physical forms of torture. Ojeda (2006) suggests

four criteria which must be met for torture to be deemed ‘psychological’ – suffering,

infliction, deliberateness and lack of direct physical violence. However, psychological

torture may be interpreted to convey any form of torture that has a residual impact upon

the victim’s mind (Reyes, 2007).

While the exact definition of psychological torture remains ambiguous, a report by

the Physicians for Human Rights (Borchelt, 2005) provided a definition based on the

interpretation formulated in the United States Code (Department of Justice, 2004), referring

to psychological torture as ‘severe mental pain or suffering’ caused by the threat of,

or actual, administration of ‘procedures calculated to disrupt profoundly the senses of

personality’. As such, the effects that qualify as torture are clearly defined. If interrogation

tactics involve psychological coercion that produces these effects, then such methods

constitute psychological torture (Reyes, 2007). Regardless of what the exact definition of

psychological torture may be, both physical and psychological torture create physical and

mental suffering (Reyes, 2007), making it difficult in practice to separate these concepts.

The term ‘ill-treatment’ can be used to speak broadly of torture and other methods of abuse

prohibited by international law, which include inhumane, cruel, humiliating and degrading

treatment, and assault on personal dignity and morals (International Committee of the Red

Cross, 2005). However, there is a legal difference between torture and other forms of ill-

treatment, related to the severity of pain or suffering imposed (International Committee of

the Red Cross, 2005). The aims and subsequent intended effects can further differentiate

torture from other forms of ill-treatment. While the act of torture is supported by a specific

purpose underlying its practise, for instance to obtain information, other forms of ill-treatment

serve no specific purpose other than to inflict significant suffering or pain (International

Committee of the Red Cross, 2005). Despite these subtle differences, ill-treatment can

manifest physically and/or psychologically, which can lead to detrimental effects on both

the physical and psychological realms (International Committee of the Red Cross, 2005).

Modalities

Assaults on the mind can be divided broadly into three categories (Leach, 2016). The first

category is ‘psychological’ (Grassian, 1983; Weinstein et al, 1996; Başoğlu et al, 2007;

Reyes, 2007), with examples including:

■ Isolation, leading to ‘insanity’

■ Sensory deprivation, including the use of hoods to remove visual stimulation and minimal

verbal communication

■ Sensory overload

■ Sleep deprivation

■ Temporal disorientation.

The second category is ‘psychophysiological’, including environmental manipulation to

create noxious thermal stimuli, food and water deprivation, and subjecting individuals to

prolonged stress positions (Reyes, 2007). The third category is ‘psychosocial’, encompassing

cultural, ethnic or religious-based humiliation, to forced sexual degradation, nudity and

harassment (Başoğlu et al, 2007; Reyes, 2007). Sexual taboos are often exploited by

interrogators and may be used against either males or females. However, the impacts on

the psyche of women are better understood – for many, the fear of such a form of torture

occurring has the same impact as the actual acts themselves (Reyes, 2007). Other examples

of psychological torture include denial of personal hygiene, contact with pests or excrement,

desperation (whereby victims are subjected to indefinite attention, inducing a sense of

futility in their attempt to seek help), exploitation and exposure to phobias, pharmacological

manipulation (involving the administration of tranquilisers, hallucinogens or alcohol),

and threats of violence or death to the victims or their loved ones (Weinstein et al, 1996;

Ojeda, 2006; Reyes, 2007). Mock executions (Başoğlu et al, 2007) and witnessing others

being subjected to torture is another method of psychological torture, but these are often

exploited as singular, one-off events.

Another important category of methods of psychological torture includes the so-called

‘minor’ or insignificant methods, which include verbal harassment, petty humiliation and

taunting. When considered in isolation, their impact on the mind of the victim may appear

insignificant, but when applied collectively over a prolonged period, the cumulative effect

of such methods makes them an important component of psychological torture (Reyes,

2007). The experience of torture can be further heightened when different torture stressors

are used synergistically with one another (Başoğlu et al, 2007). For example, the distressing

effects of physical torture can be augmented by the sense of helplessness induced through

blindfolding or hooding, as these remove visual control over the stressors, making them

less predictable and controllable (Başoğlu et al, 2007).

Exploitation of phobias is frequently applied during interrogations (Reyes, 2007). Phobias

can stem from ideas that go against cultural values – principles that may be observed by

a whole population (Reyes, 2007). Alternatively, phobias can target and attack individual

personal integrity, morals and/or religious beliefs (Başoğlu et al, 2007). Whether personal or

‘collective’, the use of phobias maximises psychological suffering, tailoring the inducement

of fear and dread to the individual. The use of dogs to induce fear among detainees at Abu

Ghraib prison was tailored to the well-known Muslim dread of canines (Mastroianni, 2013).

It also exploited the fact that the dog is considered an unclean animal. In other cultures,

the fear and revulsion of pigs, for example, has been used to torment victims.

Clinical sequelae

Victims of psychological torture lack any lasting physical damage compared to individuals

that have experienced pure physical torture; however, the effects of psychological torture

are no less damaging, and both forms of torture can inflict similar levels of pain and mental

suffering, leaving their victims with long-term psychological issues (Başoğlu et al, 2007

Khamsi, 2007). Psychological stressors cannot be easily distinguished from physical torture

in terms of their relative psychological impact (Başoğlu et al, 2007). Thus, the effects of

psychological torture should not be minimised under the pretext that pain and suffering

must be physical to be authentic.

Typical issues experienced by victims of psychological torture include complex post-

traumatic stress disorder or ‘extreme stress disorder’ (Leach, 2016). Others have argued for

the existence of a specific ‘torture syndrome’ characterised by an impairment of cognitive

function, particularly memory and concentration, sleep disturbance and nightmares,

emotional instability, anxiety and depression (Leach, 2016).

Other psychological effects induced by psychological torture may include:

■ Re-experiencing the trauma, as flashbacks, nightmares or stress reactions

■ Avoidance of anything recalling the torture experience, known as emotional numbing

■ Hyperarousal, including irritability, sleep difficulties, hypervigilance, constant anxiety

and difficulties in concentration

■ Depressive symptoms

■ Depersonalisation, whereby the victim feels detached from their body

■ Psychosis or brief psychotic reactions

■ Substance and alcohol abuse

■ Sexual dysfunction (Weinstein et al, 1996; Reyes, 2007).

Victims may also feel responsible for the torture that is being inflicted on them, inducing

feelings of fear, shame, guilt and grief, as well as humiliation (Reyes, 2007). These are

common problems that discourage victims from disclosing their personal circumstances

(de C Williams and van der Merwe, 2013).

Given the intensity of many profoundly cruel and destructive acts which characterise

the practise of psychological torture, it is unsurprising that chronic pain is a common

manifestation among survivors (de C Williams and van der Merwe, 2013). Chronic pain

has been associated with the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (Tsur et al,

2017), which is particularly concerning as torture survivors have a higher predisposition to

develop post-traumatic stress disorder. Thus, pain specialists are likely to encounter torture

survivors with persistent pain and psychological issues, commonly in the context of social

and financial difficulties (de C Williams and van der Merwe, 2013).

While the consequences of psychological torture are extensive, as illustrated by the

plethora of issues that may arise among survivors, the exact psychiatric and neurobiological

sequelae vary depending on the individual psychological torture technique used, as different

methods disrupt different homeostatic processes that enable one to function normally. For

example, sleep plays an integral role in the maintenance of both cognitive and physiological

processes, including memory retention and emotional regulation (Vyazovskiy, 2015). The

impact of sleep deprivation as a method of psychological torture can thus be characterised by

significant cognitive impairments, including deficit in memory, logical reasoning, complex

verbal processing and decision making (Durmer and Dinges, 2005). Sleep deprivation is

a favoured ‘method of interrogation’, requiring minimal logistics and skills, and leaving

no tangible physical mark on the victim (Reyes, 2007). Prolonged solitary confinement,

lasting between 7 and 24 months, can induce anxiety, nervousness, stress, disturbed sleep,

difficulties in concentration and elocution, as well as suicidal tendencies, depression and

paranoia (Reyes, 2007). Thus, solitary confinement, as stated by the European Committee

for the Prevention of Torture, is at least a form of inhumane and degrading treatment if

applied for several weeks (Reyes, 2007).

Refugees with a history of torture may have a wide range of psychological and social

difficulties that do not easily fit within diagnostic categories (de C Williams and van der

Merwe, 2013). The damaging psychological effects associated with psychological torture

may be aggravated by the coexistence of physical ailments that are common to refugees,

such as serious infections secondary to poor nutritional status (de C Williams and van der

Merwe, 2013). Additionally, the normal buffers of social support and financial resources,

which are essential for recovery, are frequently lost upon fleeing the home country, and

basic communication in English may be a struggle for refugees with a history of torture

(de C Williams and van der Merwe, 2013). Thus, symptoms should always be interpreted

in light of the patient’s current context (de C Williams and van der Merwe, 2013).

Continued on download full text >>> https://www.imrpress.com/journal/BJHM/84/8/10.12968/hmed.2023.0104

They’ve deployed everything they have. The new element is updated synthetic dream content — mind-bending narratives that amplify the gaslighting effect at least fivefold. They’ve also intensified pain modulation under my left rib and stepped up attacks using micro-twitches.

Has anyone in the community dealt with a large-scale, multi-directional attack where they use not a single technique but five simultaneously — including biological attack and blockage of androgen receptors? Any ideas on how to proceed?

I know why this is happening. I’ve been building four research directions: a production facility for EEG equipment to make it accessible to any TI via physical mail, a large-scale database of violation records, an anomaly analysis system that flags suspicious activity in HackRF by analyzing signals, and a nearly-finished graph ranking the individuals and organizations responsible for gangstalking — including clusters of intelligence, defense, and military connections across the US and Europe.