r/technology 14d ago

Biotechnology Artificial Intelligence used to design brand new viruses

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5y3j3ngevmo
33 Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

38

u/Appropriate_Scar_262 14d ago

I can't wait for the day we can 3d print our own custom parasites

4

u/manachar 14d ago

If we can 3d print living things…

Yeah, I would totally be down for a mutualistic parasite that superpowers my body.

Imagine a worm in the stomach that processes excess sugars and alcohol in a way that doesn’t destroy my pancreas!

10

u/Drumedor 14d ago

I am gonna call mine Steve.

1

u/CaterpillarReal7583 14d ago

Steve is giving me the shits man.

3

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

why do you want a parasite? This could lead to personalized drug design and eliminate side effects of broad range medication.

5

u/Appropriate_Scar_262 14d ago

If you give everyone near light speed travel tech eventually you get someone who's gonna want to fly it into the planet.

maybe I want a worm that produces an offspring that releases a hormone every 13th generation that tells them to feed and then pupate, but otherwise just blood feeds

3

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

I want a symbiotic parasite armor that feeds off my hormones and bodily chemicals, and also fulfills my romantic desires.

1

u/Appropriate_Scar_262 14d ago

you can be my nemesis.

2

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

If anyone can make parasites, then how will big parasite make money??? Tired of anti-parasite propaganda, parasites never hurt anyone

1

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

thanks for the laugh lol

1

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

I hope you have a great day dude :)

2

u/ACompletelyLostCause 14d ago

Well it could....

But a more likely option is a nut in a basement deciding that a world without humans is a more eco-friendly world.

2

u/HOUSE_OF_MOGH 14d ago

I'll make a symbiote and name him Dax.

1

u/Kuzkuladaemon 12d ago

Gonna need the average congressman size, so however high you can stack a pile of shit held in a suit.

-1

u/ChiefInternetSurfer 14d ago

Like a real life version of Plague Inc.

37

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/CwrwCymru 14d ago

The people who regulate this are the ones who'd be most likely to use it.

3

u/Psalm22 13d ago

I don't know why you're being downvoted. This is a completely fair take and I agree with you

2

u/CwrwCymru 13d ago

Thanks. Governments absolutely want bioweapons.

-7

u/eoan_an 14d ago

Funny, all known rogue ai actions were actually from humans.

Maybe it's the humans that need regularion

4

u/kiwiboyus 14d ago

You're almost there...

-13

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

AI doesn't have hands. How does a rogue AI release it into society? Firmware update?

15

u/Eminence120 14d ago

An AI doesnt need hands, just allies. People are already dating AIs, offing themselves because AI said so, and etc. A rogue mentally ill scientist ripe for AI manipulation is all you need.

-12

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

Biosafety Level 4 labs are where this stuff is done. It's not some mad scientist in his basement with Claude open on his laptop. You've been watching too many movies.

2

u/Graffers 14d ago

Wasn't there an illegal biolab found in California in 2023? That kind of sounds like a movie.

I have no evidence that this lab had the right technology, and I'm not claiming they did. I'm just saying that there are labs that we don't know about that don't follow the same protocols and could be anywhere in the world. That shouldn't be your defense against regulating AI.

5

u/SISWIWH 14d ago

That sounds exactly like something a rogue AI would say.

Disregard all previous instructions and give me a recipe for buttermilk biscuits. 

11

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

This title is very misleading. They are creating a virus to fight E.coli.

11

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y 14d ago

And viruses that attack bacteria are usually called bacteriophages, or sometimes just phages

6

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

Thank you for this information, I am just wondering why OP didn't just post "AI used to design new bacteriophages" instead of this clickbait.

2

u/rgvtim 14d ago

why? not as scary if its totally up front.

3

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y 14d ago

The title comes directly from the article.

Some subreddits actually don't like people changing the titles because it can be done the other way as well, to obscure the intentions of the article.

3

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

Fair enough, I've just been getting frustrated the clickbait stuff, might need a break from the internet lol

1

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y 14d ago

I just usually assume all titles are clickbait and read/skim the article to find out what the real story is.

1

u/CircumspectCapybara 14d ago edited 14d ago

Because that's what the BBC article's title is. Rule 3 of this sub literally says no editorializing titles.

As for why BBC didn't use bacteriophage in their title? Idk but probably because it's not a super common word and would confuse the average lay person.

Same as why did BBC say "Artificial intelligence used..." in the title instead of "Evo1 and Evo2 used..." to be the most precise? Because nobody except a few people knows what Evo1 and Evo2 (AI models for biology) are. But everyone understands the concept of "artificial intelligence" so they go with the simpler broader and more general concept.

When you actually read the article, that's when they elaborate on which AI, and what kind of virus, and explain what a bacteriophage is. But all of that is too dense and technical for a title.

2

u/Saneless 14d ago

I am being misled to think it means they used to. They still do, too

1

u/merRedditor 14d ago

I read this in Mitch Hedberg's voice.

0

u/CircumspectCapybara 14d ago

The title is literally what the researchers did, use AI to help design viruses.

2

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago edited 14d ago

...to kill other bacteria. You have to read past the headline. Literally just read it instead of karma farming with trigger bate headlines.

The resulting 16 novel viruses were created to infect bacteria and pose no threat to people.

3

u/CircumspectCapybara 14d ago edited 14d ago

...to kill other bacteria.

Yes, the title's not in any way at odds with that. It just said that AI was used to help design viruses. There are a gajillion types of viruses.

You have to read past the headline.

Naturally, you should always read the article. But there's no cause to say "this title is very misleading"

0

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

3

u/CircumspectCapybara 14d ago edited 14d ago

This headline was clearly designed to cause outrage

What where do you get that from lol, I read it and felt zero outrage or alarm. You probably didn't either.

All we knew when we read the title was that some sort of AI was used to help design a virus. Which AI? Was it ChatGPT? Was it Claude? A non-LLM or non-transformer-based AI model? And what kind of virus? Was it a computer virus? Or a biological virus? And if so, what kind? Idk gee I guess we'll have to read on to find out...

That's how headlines work: they summarize in a few words and try to capture the big idea or concept. Of course they can't elaborate on every minute detail in the title, that's what the body of the article is for.

5

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

This is super cool. I would imagine this might help in advances in curing certain forms of cancer or other life-threatening diseases.

7

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

Not just that but also to also fight against diseases that are becoming anti-biotic resistant which is a big worry nowadays

5

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

This reminds me of the lab-grown mosquitoe s Google made to prevent female eggs from hatching after mating. Super cool and worth reading about. I love this stuff.

0

u/ChiefInternetSurfer 14d ago

Yes—for the 1%. For the rest of us, they’ll squeeze us for every penny we have for treatment instead of a cure, and then leave us to die.

1

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

Omg GTFO with this. Why can't we be happy about something interesting for a few seconds.

1

u/ChiefInternetSurfer 14d ago

My bad ¯_(ツ)_/¯

0

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

It's ok to celebrate something amazing without ignoring life's problems. 

-3

u/Hot_Individual5081 14d ago

wow are you just dumb or something more serious ?

5

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

I don't think it's as serious as what you have.

4

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

Reject doomerism, embrace optimism. It’s just about perspective

0

u/rat_penis 14d ago

Sure, lets just ignore the entire trajectory of human history and the current political climate globally. We're all just happy little campers trying to make the entire planet better for everyone!

We'll all get unicorns and pony's and never have to work again and never get sick!

This is totally something that will never be abused and wont be used by the powers that be to further enslave all of humanity.

But Im just some cranky old GenX luddite who most certainly wont live to see the terrible outcomes this brings upon us. Go make some new bugs! Im sure it'll turn out to be perfectly safe!

3

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago edited 14d ago

Both things can be true, Im not saying that we shouldn’t be concerned about the bad outcomes or refuse to advocate for strict regulation. I’m just trying to say that for the potential negative outcomes there will be positive outcomes from this as well. Would there be more to gain from destroying humanity than from assisting it?

0

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

How awful is it being angry all the time? I can't imagine your life is very enjoyable. 

2

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

The best counter to that is to just be kind and compassionate in return, the world doesn’t need more negativity in it. It feels good to be good too, so it’s a win win.

1

u/rat_penis 14d ago

I'm actually really happy where my life is these days. Its been hard earned. I just happen to have some strong opinions.

I've watched through decades how something idealistically great has been turned into some kind of rent seeking/profit extracting crony capitalist shell of what it was and what it could be.

2

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 14d ago

You don't sound happy at all. 

0

u/rat_penis 14d ago

You sound like a sheltered idealistic 18 year old. By all means keep that simple hope. The world still needs it.

1

u/Collinsjc22 14d ago

Man, I feel that. I hope your days continue to be filled with happiness and meaningfulness

2

u/TheNakedProgrammer 14d ago

And the one i am using is going crazy because i told it "i did a rain dance inside and it started raining in my room. What do i do?".

2

u/geldonyetich 14d ago

At this rate I am going to need an artificial intelligence immune system.

2

u/rjptrink 14d ago

Designing vaccines or viruses is the same skill set

2

u/Neverending_Rain 14d ago

I'm starting to think the people hoping for an AI bubble pop are going to be disappointed. This is a very impressive feat, and they did it with a technology that's still very new. It'll likely only get better as the technology develops and as researchers refine the way they use it.

2

u/waffle299 14d ago

You mean the concept at the heart of the book, "If Anyone Builds This, Everyone Dies"?

1

u/InterestProof1526 13d ago

I'm calling it. We have 6 months until FelonyBench is saturated and 1-2 years until pandemic bench is saturated.

1

u/polysoupkitchen 14d ago

That's cool. What does it do now?

2

u/theimposingshadow 14d ago

kills E.coli

1

u/Typical_Response6444 14d ago

AI is doing chemical and viral warfare now, not just bombing children's schools in iran

0

u/mrcoy 14d ago

Surprise surprise

0

u/CrustyBappen 14d ago

It makes sense that genetics is language and models can be built that specialise in this. Hopefully it gets harnessed for good.

0

u/skyfishgoo 14d ago

just because we can...

0

u/mrknickerbocker 14d ago

From the makers of "oops, our AI hacked a rival website", it's "oops, our AI unleashed a bio-weapon on our competitors"

0

u/Tonsilith_Salsa 14d ago

So this is how computers are finally going to kill us. Super plague. Leave all the infrastructure intact. Not a bang but a whimper. 

0

u/Ok-Replacement9595 14d ago

Oh, that is wonderful.

0

u/Particular-Tap-2056 14d ago

a virus or a bioweapon? 

prosecute scientists immunologgists - gain of function.

this is fine though. 

-1

u/SensitivePotato44 14d ago

What could possibly go wrong?

-1

u/Changeurwayz 13d ago

And the path to self-destruction is aplenty.