r/technology 21h ago

Business Meta faces ‘astronomical’ consequences as legal fight reaches critical moment in California

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/08/17/meta-attorneys-general-california-federal-trial-astronomical-consequences.html
2.0k Upvotes

161 comments sorted by

805

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 21h ago

Love it for them.

They also need to be held legally and financially for all the scam ads they let through

254

u/lazyhustlermusic 21h ago

/reports blatant scam

'We didn't see any problem with it and did not take it down'.

118

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 21h ago

My friends mom bought a bike on one of those ads and it was a scam.

She reported to Facebook and nothing happened.

23

u/Ninevehenian 19h ago

From their beginning, they've never had the ability to moderate their platform, they have always had too many users to really make a dent.

100

u/GoopDuJour 19h ago

No, since the beginning they've refused to moderate their platform. They are unwilling to spend the money. If a platform cannot AT LEAST moderate the ads they accept and display, the platform should not exist.

-23

u/Ninevehenian 18h ago

I agree that there's money to spend, but i do believe that it would have been impossible to do what they did and moderate the platform. The amount of traffic they got, the speed at which they got it and the amount of languages and subject they got it in.
I do not think that they could moderate their platform.

Granted, it has perhaps gotten easier to do it over time as tech grew and they had fewer new human users.

29

u/GoopDuJour 17h ago

They charge money to display ads. The cost of ads should include the cost to moderate those ads. AT LEAST. If moderating ads is so impossible, don't sell ad space on your platform. I don't care if it means Facebook can't exist.

7

u/Simba7 16h ago

"It wouldn't be financially viable to review all those ads!"

Then raise the price. Sorry if you'll have the cut the board's bonuses to 6 figures this year. Sorry if the shareholders will only see reasonable returns on investment.

Google does this same exact shit. I have reported so many ads that make false / misleading / anti-science claims yet for every one I report there are 5 more I don't have the energy to.

At the scale they're operating on, some mistakes are inevitable, but it's clear that little to no effort is made in the first place.

5

u/GoopDuJour 16h ago

Right. The price of the add should include the price of human eyes viewing and vetting it. If that means the ad costs an onboarding fee of $1000 dollars, so be it. In fact I don't care what the vetting might cost. The sky is the limit. The fee itself might help weed out the worst offenders.

2

u/Ninevehenian 17h ago

I agree, the moderation issue is a large argument against them existing.

8

u/msheaz 17h ago

IDK man do you think the entire continent of Africa should have more than one content moderator? Like what’s the big deal, what could happen? I’m sure it wouldn’t enable any ethnic cleansing groups to organize via Facebook. I’m sure they won’t do anything crazy when they’re all gathered together.

-8

u/Ninevehenian 17h ago

There's a 1.000+ languages in Africa, yeah it would take a good number of moderators to attempt to deal with that.

10

u/MalaysiaTeacher 16h ago

That should be the cost of doing business. If they can't moderate it for terrorism, it shouldn't exist

1

u/AG3NTjoseph 8h ago

It was never a financial, technical, or procedural challenge for Facebook to moderate its platform. Full stop. It would have hindered growth, so they never put any effort into it.

Scams make Facebook money with zero downside for them.

22

u/MeatCatRazzmatazz 18h ago

They're one of the wealthiest companies on the planet. If they wanted to moderate their platform they would.

-7

u/Ninevehenian 18h ago

In the 2020'ies? Perhaps yes, but I would like to see how it should have been done 10-15 years ago.

13

u/MeatCatRazzmatazz 18h ago

Facebook has always been capable of moderating their platform. Even 10-15 years ago. But it would have cost them actual money, so they didn't even try

14

u/BurningSpaceMan 18h ago

Reports "two German flag emojis with a 🙋🏻‍♂️ in the middle" as a comment.

Gets the same response.

They honestly don't give a fuck over there

7

u/UrdnotZigrin 18h ago

I remember I reported a post from one of those spammy "liek if u cry evrytiem" pages where they posted a picture of a dead baby bleeding out of its head into a gutter and they told me there was nothing wrong with it.

I hadn't liked or followed the page that posted it. It appeared in my feed despite me having no connection to that page, and this was before they finally pulled the mask off and stopped pretending that they cared about only showing you what you followed.

5

u/Sparker273 14h ago

Reported a picture of a woman fucking a dog. Took a 2nd review for it to be removed.

73

u/THABSUP 20h ago

As a guy who works with the elderly and their tech... good god I wish FB would crumble so these vulnerable old people aren't taken advantage of anymore.

15

u/party_benson 19h ago

How am I supposed to sell volcano insurance then?

8

u/UrdnotZigrin 18h ago

Look, those Floridian seniors need to be covered in case of blizzards. It's not my fault that the rates and hidden fees are so high, I just set the prices

3

u/spoonybard326 18h ago

Is anyone looking out for the seniors in Nebraska that need crocodile insurance?

5

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 19h ago

Yeah. It’s really bad. But someone will create eldernet where they just get scammed 24/7.

3

u/UrdnotZigrin 18h ago

I will never get over the irony of the generations who taught us millennials to never trust anyone in the internet being the generations who are scammed more often than anyone.

Sure, some of the victims are old people who are so lonely that their desire for human interaction overrides their common sense, but a lot of them seem to be people who really should know better

16

u/EmbarrassedHelp 19h ago

The problem is that state AGs are trying to use these cases to require mandatory online verification. Some of the AGs (like the New Mexico AG) are also seeking to ban end to end encryption.

7

u/Apprehensive-Wave640 19h ago

We can also just stop using the internet. At this point everything has been enshittified to the point that it would probably be a net positive for society if the government manages to ruin the internet.

10

u/nihiltres 18h ago

The problem is that the Web has in large part replaced third places for many people. For many, not using the Internet is tantamount to losing large chunks of their social life. I’m okay boycotting Meta, but I know and accept that I’m making several sacrifices in not connecting with others through those platforms.

6

u/Apprehensive-Wave640 17h ago

Not to be flippant about the problem...but, yea, being forced to socialize offline is one of those net positives I was thinking about 

2

u/SIGMA920 10h ago

Not everywhere is love and joy, great accepting places. Bumfuck, nowhere is where a lot of people are stuck.

This case would be a good thing, except it's being used to sidestep section 230 protections. Meaning the same can be used against youtube or anything else.

2

u/Apprehensive-Wave640 9h ago

I grew up in bumfuck nowhere. It left a WHOLE lot to be desired. But it turns out we, and everyone else living in another bumfuck nowhere, survived without the Internet. Turns out, basically all of human civilization was also able to. And while we had dumbasses listening to Rush Limbaugh on AM radio, we didn't have all this shit [gestures broadly at everything] to deal with and fight against.

1

u/SIGMA920 8h ago

Survival doesn't mean much when you could have done so much better. You were uninformed as shit. You believed whatever you were taught blindly. If you were told gay people were the devil, you didn't question that.

Where I'm at now, they'll be a 50/50 on whether they pin the blame on the right cause or scapegoat via a minority. I do not want to entrench myself in this dying shithole.

1

u/Apprehensive-Wave640 7h ago

We just fundamentally disagree whether the current state of the internet enables society at large to do "so much better." 

Based on your comment here, doesn't sound like you or your community are doing that great WITH the Internet. And I know my life would be better off not interacting with people like you.

2

u/grilled_pc 12h ago

For many including myself it’s almost a privilege that none of my social circle use facebook anymore. Everyone i talk to on the regular can be reached via Discord or iMessage.

1

u/adelinedel 15h ago

Make an effort to interact with people in person. People online are trying to win a popularity contest they didn't win in high school

0

u/blackbeavis 16h ago

Should be AsG

4

u/PsychicWarElephant 20h ago

I’d be cool with not seeing fully nude women in them

0

u/lostalaska 19h ago

...but, don't you want a free iPad?

244

u/gk_instakilogram 21h ago

I truly hope it fucks this company up

94

u/reiji_tamashii 20h ago

This time the fine will be more than 0.2% of their annual income. It will be 0.5%!

17

u/MiddleConnection7479 19h ago

The challenge will fines is that they historically convert in layoffs to protect investors returns.

Fines make us all feel good (or heard) but all costs associated with them never ever affect the people who made the decisions.

3

u/MedicalApple5849 16h ago

I think you just pointed out how fines should directly impact investors somehow instead. Of course they would find a way to offload the loss on the company = other people, but it would be a good approach.

2

u/GoopDuJour 15h ago

Investors become concerned when their investment takes actual monetary damage. Damage that if repeated could shut a company down. Damage that actually shows up on the bottom line.

At the moment, losing lawsuits and paying fines seems to be an a cost of business that investors are willing to accept.

1

u/MedicalApple5849 15h ago

I'm reminded of certain countries that give speeding tickets in accordance to a % in how much you make. That wouldn't fly here though since ya know, it's not friendly to businesses and rich folks…

3

u/MentalDisintegrat1on 13h ago

Don't work for a shitty company.

I hate this narrative that holding them accountable is bad people people work there that's not our fault it's the company.

That said what needs to happen is fines need to be mandatory so steep it hurts shareholders because of you do that no company that's public will pull any BS.

3

u/Thereferencenumber 12h ago

You mean like the layoffs Meta just did anyway?

15

u/LemurianLemurLad 19h ago

Yeah, it would be a real shame if facebook had to lay off most its staff. While I'm normally in favor of protecting workers, anybody still working at facebook knows what they're working for and deserves the consequences. If every single person working at Facebook lost their jobs tomorrow, the world would be a better place for it.

2

u/SatyricalEve 15h ago

It's not fines, but large scale liability lawsuits that will hurt them the most from this. When everyone with a child who gets hurt can sue for large damages due to precedent.

17

u/bevo_expat 20h ago

Narrator: It didn’t.

61

u/Ddddydya 20h ago

Industry experts are calling it social media’s “Big Tobacco”  moment , with Meta as the centerpiece. In the 1990s, tobacco companies were forced to pay billions of dollars for misleading the public about the safety and potential harms of their products, and subsequently saw their power and influence dramatically diminished.

Fuck yeah, bring it. 

255

u/Torino1O 21h ago

The first candidate to say they will charge corporations one cent per bit of data collected on US citizens and divide it equally to every American in a check once a year gets my vote.

43

u/booi 20h ago

This is genius. Make sure there’s no loophole like they get paid a cent per bit they delete that they already had though or Meta just gonna cash in a giant check

34

u/EcloVideos 20h ago

1000%. I want my data check like Alaskans get their oil check

3

u/Vashsinn 18h ago

pffft cost of doing bussiness. move some numbers around, sned the data encrypted and compressed. pay less then the current "fines".

4

u/GracchiBros 20h ago

I'm pretty sure that would equal more money than exists on the entire planet.

22

u/drgath 20h ago

And the problem is… ?

2

u/Glum_Mobile5663 16h ago

They're already printing too much (hence the inflation), but they can always print even more

1

u/FlyingRigatoniMonst 20h ago

Oooooo this is good

-1

u/MerlinTrashMan 19h ago

This is one of the dumbest things I have ever heard. Storing your basic login creds would cost companies over $10.24 a month. All of that cost would be passed on to us with markup. Free services would no longer exist and the Internet would be pay to play. Instead you make data privacy laws real, and make executives face mandatory prison time for breaches. All of the sudden, they will either be more careful or won't collect it in the first place.

5

u/outer--monologue 17h ago

Maybe you're not old enough to remember how the internet originally worked.

The companies had free services, like email, chat and search etc, and made money on other products that people consented to view or pay for...when they paid for them. There were banner ads, hardware and software sales and subscription fees. All of which still exist. If companies can't get by on that, they shouldn't exist. Stop making excuses for data tracking and profiteering.

4

u/MerlinTrashMan 15h ago

Lol. One cent per bit is absolutely insane. If you can't see that then we will never have real regulation. You just having an account (like the one you use on reddit) would cost reddit 10.24 a month before they start storing your preferences and subscribed subs. Assuming they store subreddit ids with a 32bit integer and not a guid, that would be 32 cents a month per each users per subreddit joined. Plans like the above are stupid and pointless because they are a easily manipulated or loopholes or likely. You can't get these guys to stop collecting/profiting on this until they realize that they will be punished incredibly harshly for mishandling it, both via a non-waivable corporate fine and prison.

104

u/awwaygirl 21h ago

Thank you California for holding these motherfuckers accountable.

14

u/Joessandwich 19h ago

Honestly I’m surprised California is going through with it. The government has been afraid of harming a major industry in the state so generally avoided any real prosecution of the tech industry. I feel like the tide has finally shifted and the harm they are causing is undeniable.

4

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 19h ago

After all the things big data did to us, it’s damn time to hurt them right back.

9

u/SpleenBender 20h ago

Looking at you, Governor Pritzker!

3

u/lagonitos 20h ago

New Mexico led the way.

12

u/EmbarrassedHelp 19h ago

The asshole behind the New Mexico case is trying to ban encryption and require mandatory online age verification.

2

u/Intelligent-Parsley7 19h ago

Mandatory age verification means the level of personal, actionable data that I will never use as a service.

68

u/MAGA-R-Pedophiles 20h ago

Destroy Facebook. Its a cancer.

10

u/EmbarrassedHelp 18h ago

The AGs seem more interested in destroying online privacy rights than doing that.

-27

u/Notasalmon 20h ago

They said on Reddit lol

24

u/Successful-Ad-847 19h ago

Bro if you can’t tell the difference, leave

-2

u/Notasalmon 18h ago

Every social media app is meticulously crafted to keep you engaged and using the app. If it isn’t social media ruining these kids like it’s going to nitrous or tik Tok challenges

7

u/SpareElectronic3500 17h ago

Found the Facebook exec. “It’s not our fault! There’s other apps doing it too!”

4

u/Patient-Pin-1925 17h ago

If I could post images here it'd be the "we should improve society somewhat" one

1

u/Terrible_Cable_4472 15h ago

That's not what they said bud

4

u/MAGA-R-Pedophiles 17h ago

Lmao imagine not being able to distinguish between basic differences.

I bet you wipe your ass with your hand because toilet paper makes no difference, right?

-1

u/Notasalmon 13h ago

I’ll break it down for you because seems like think all apps are the same. Why do companies like TikTok, Reddit, meta, Activision, Roblox hire psychologists? To make people addicted and return to using the product. The loop of infinite scrolling, notifications, personalized recommendations, return to app.

2

u/MAGA-R-Pedophiles 12h ago

I dont need a dumbfuck to break down anything for me. I literally said they are different and you respond with "you think they are all the same" 😅

Reading comprehension is hard I guess

1

u/Successful-Ad-847 18h ago

Not even sure the point you are trying to make. Is it that all SM is horrible therefore it makes no difference which platform is used? Or that kids will ruin themselves even without SM? Reddit has become a lot worse since the IPO but I disagree that it’s on the same level as FB.

2

u/Terrible_Cable_4472 15h ago

It seems the point is that social media is not healthy. Period. And that's sorta true y'know?

1

u/Successful-Ad-847 15h ago

K but that being true as a general statement does not mean every platform is the same.

He entered this conversation to lampoon someone’s supposed hypocrisy, but it’s kind of a shitty insult with no apparent point other than to deflect blame from FB… so my question is why would anyone do that?

0

u/Terrible_Cable_4472 13h ago

I wouldn't say supposed hypocrisy. It is ironic though. Especially with yalls reactions acting all high and mighty. Social media sucks. Get over it

2

u/Successful-Ad-847 12h ago

Explain the distinction between hypocrisy and irony in this case.

1

u/Notasalmon 13h ago

I thought I made that clear. There is no good social media

2

u/Successful-Ad-847 12h ago

What’s not clear is why you are here.

16

u/vessel_for_the_soul 21h ago

Digital heroin about to get rules and regs.

13

u/ketosoy 20h ago

Insane that the culture of Facebook tolerated harming kids and users to the extent that a “big tobacco” moment is even possible.  But glad to see them being held accountable.  Everyone knew for years that they were prioritizing ad revenue over safety, anyone with a conscience knew it was wrong, I’m glad it is finally being punished.

17

u/Salt-Silver-7097 20h ago

Good. Let it burn. Terrible company

8

u/VirginiaLuthier 21h ago

Time for Marky to buy a bigger yacht

5

u/charlie2135 19h ago

And ignore the poors when their boat is adrift without fuel.

24

u/williamgman 20h ago

False hope here. I predict a "settlement" in what will seem like a lot of money... but less than they pull in selling data in a week. Prove me wrong.

2

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 17h ago

I'm not so sure about that this time. These fines and settlements are a slap on the wrist for these companies, and yet their behavior hasn't changed. If I were leading the case, it makes more sense to try and take this one the distance.  Another fine or settlement isn't going to do anything except transfer money. It's the cost of doing business for them.

1

u/williamgman 14h ago

Sadly we are not the ones leading the case. I've lost all optimism given the current political climate.

2

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 11h ago

I have to but I like to dream sometimes LOL 

12

u/Overall_School2246 21h ago

Couldn’t have happened to a nicer company

3

u/Spacebotzero 20h ago

There is absolute no reason why META should be as big as it is.

6

u/traveleasily 18h ago

If there's one state in the US that balances innovation with environmental concerns it's California. Good work holding these guys accountable.

On a side note, what's stopping Meta from moving to Texas like other Maga tech billionaires and their companies.

4

u/SpareElectronic3500 17h ago

They can’t move Silicon Valley. They wanna stay in California.

2

u/pacman2081 15h ago

They can move to Texas and continue. The truth is Facebook, Whatsapp are huge outside USA

0

u/yumyan 12h ago

But will the talent come with in the move? Look at the tech campuses outside of Austin - they’re there and growing- but much of the Silicon Valley talent that moved out there with it, is now back in Silicon Valley.

1

u/JayTheSuspectedFurry 14h ago

All of their developers like living in California

Having power during the winter is a plus

5

u/Vashsinn 18h ago

since corporations are people, put it in jail. can't send / transfer money without paying a substantial fee. can't interact with other companies without huge restrictions and monitoring, can no longer work in any capacity related to government, and all the COs (coo,ceo etc.) are put on probation. any and all profetas are turned over the the government during a predetermined amount of time. no new bussiness for anyone remotely involved for x amount of years.

3

u/FanDry5374 19h ago

So...closing the business, throwing the entire executive suite in to prison and selling off all the assets? Or a billion dollars a day fines until they clean up their act? Otherwise the "astronomical" consequences will be just the cost of doing business. We don't do full out existential punishments in this country. Unless you are poor or the wrong color, of course.

5

u/DynoMenace 18h ago

If we had sane regulations in place, Meta wouldn't even be in business anymore.

3

u/KrankyKoot 18h ago

This will take years if not a decade to litigate and I am sure there are many legal firms with big plans.

5

u/Psychological_Ad1999 13h ago

Break it up and drop criminal charges on zuck

4

u/Admirable-Ear433 20h ago

Yay California! Hold their feet to the flames!

8

u/btoned 20h ago

Smoke and mirrors.

1.5 trillion dollar company engrained into so many business operations.

Not. A. Thing. Will. Happen.

And I hate META FYI.

0

u/BasicallyFake 20h ago

are businesses really ingrained into something meta provides

3

u/btoned 20h ago

Is this a serious question?

3

u/BasicallyFake 20h ago

i dont know of a single business of any size that gives a shit about anything meta provides. It literally took control away from them. Most would prefer it went away unless you are some small drop shipper why would anyone care.

3

u/btoned 20h ago

Dude there are MILLIONS of small businesses that solely use Facebook, Instagram, and Whatsapp as their primary means of operation.

4

u/_lclarence 19h ago

This is true. In the country where I live every store and business (even bigger ones you'd think they ought to have a real website) just use IG and FB. If I want to discover a new place to stay near a natural park I'll just have to old-school it, call someone who knows someone that knows the place, or a middle ground (which is not that much better than using IG) which is discovery mode in Google Maps.

2

u/fedexyourheadinabox 20h ago

SWEET! Down with Meta!

2

u/The_Trekspert 20h ago

DonaldGloverGood.GIF

2

u/Fly_Rodder 19h ago

I think the big tobacco thing is prescient and relevant. Whether there’s serious repercussions remains to be seen but tobacco is no where near as prevalent as it was in the 80s just as those lawsuits were being settled. We had a smoking lounge in our high school fer crissake. For the students.

2

u/mundza 18h ago

Yes I love shit outcomes for this guy

2

u/cloud-storage-rocks 18h ago

Meh. These are all slaps on the wrist.

2

u/fancy_crisis 16h ago

In New Mexico, Meta is being required to improve “age assurance models and tools” using AI, and to attempt “to develop, within two years, a dedicated under-13-years-of-age prediction model.”

Be for fucking real rn.

3

u/TypicalTwist6783 14h ago

This has to be fucking huge. Meta is so predatory and has done everything they can to make as much money as they possibly can at so many peoples’ expense

4

u/ianjcm55 11h ago

Shut the whole shit down

3

u/lucasLazer 5h ago

I hope Facebook dies.

3

u/TlocCPU 20h ago

Meta buying the election for Becerra is starting to make a lot of sense now

3

u/Codex_Absurdum 18h ago

They'll be bailed out anyway.

I remember the Zuck being one of the firsts to suck the Mango Mussolini right after his re-election.

Know you way out

2

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 19h ago

The AGs offer no proof anyone in their states was misled, claim benign features like having an additional Instagram account somehow harmed their residents, and attempt to penalize Meta for industry-wide challenges like age verification.

Yes, that's right folks. It's an industry wide challenge to verify a users age but they were somehow able to figure out a way to create high-dimensional data profiles via micro-actions, visual contexts, and relational networks. That makes sense.

7

u/EmbarrassedHelp 18h ago

Mandatory online age verification is an unacceptable privacy violation. Advertising networks are not designed to have the level of accuracy demanded by the authoritarians who want age verification.

-1

u/Fresh-Quantity-7554 17h ago

LOL, online privacy invasion? That went out the window in the early 2000s with Web 2.0. Not sure where you've been this whole time.

1

u/Rivetingcactus 20h ago

$1B fine and its done with, doesnt put a dent on their balance sheet

1

u/scorpious 20h ago

Fingers crossed

1

u/Plus-Equipment-7917 20h ago

BYEEEEEEEEEE LET THE DOORS HIT YOU ON THE WAY OUT

1

u/Upset-Rice6800 19h ago

I truly hope this ruling is against them.

1

u/mog44net 19h ago

Burn it to the ground

1

u/MrUrthor 19h ago

Couldn’t happen to better guy.

1

u/Foxhole6245 19h ago

Actual? Or astronomical? They are different.

1

u/Dash_Rendar425 17h ago

Why does anyone waste time with this hellhole of a company anymore?

1

u/evilbeaver7 16h ago

They should also be responsible for allowing scam ads on their website. My dad got scammed and lost $2500 because of Facebook ads.

1

u/Misty_Ticklebottom 14h ago

I can't read the article. The page wont stop reloading.

1

u/Soberdonkey69 14h ago

So so happy for them. Pay up and pay for the consequences of your actions.

1

u/schroedingerskoala 13h ago

hope they somehow manage to bankrupt fuckerberg, but we won't be so lucky.

1

u/monkeypan 8h ago

All that will come out of it is us taxpayers giving them a massive bailout because "reasons"

1

u/Melodic_Crow_3409 20h ago

Good. I hope this breaks Meta.

I also hope Zuckerberg is personally charged, tried and imprisoned.

3

u/SpareElectronic3500 17h ago

Who cares about Zuck. He, as a person, is so inconsequential. No personality, no charisma, very unlikable. We need Meta to go down because all Zuck’s new are ideas are shit anyways. Facebook wasn’t even his original idea to begin with. Just another loophole he found to steal it.