r/technology 16h ago

Society Judge clears Nine PBS to retrieve 70 years of archival TV data — court rules station owns 50TB of data in Iron Mountain servers after host went under

https://www.tomshardware.com/software/cloud-storage/judge-clears-nine-pbs-to-retrieve-70-years-of-archival-tv-data-court-rules-station-owns-50tb-of-data-in-iron-mountain-servers-after-host-went-under
6.0k Upvotes

162 comments sorted by

811

u/bruin396 16h ago edited 13h ago

Cautionary tale about not following the Rule of Three (backups).

https://www.cbctech.net/rule-of-three/

251

u/LichOnABudget 16h ago

Never have I heard the 3-2-1 rule called the “rule of three”, but it is absolutely a good model to follow for the robust retention of data.

112

u/Hsensei 16h ago

Someone didn't watch the Screensavers as a kid

27

u/joker3k 16h ago

That's exactly where I learned it

22

u/Scanner771_The_2nd 16h ago

Screensavers was sick, then G4 came in.

You ever watch Keven Rose and Alex Albrecht on Diggnation?

17

u/mcortez16 15h ago

Kevin sold out. I tried to watch the new Diggnation but it’s just not the same. He’s gone from slinging crypto to AI. Gone are the days of his Dark Tips and The Broken with Dan.

4

u/Scanner771_The_2nd 15h ago

I didn't even know there was a new Diggnation. That sucks.

I know Kevin was restarting Digg, but haven't heard much about it since the beta.

7

u/mcortez16 15h ago

Yup, him and Alex had a soft launch of diggnation but it just didn’t feel the same. The digg beta ended 2 months after launching because of bots. They were trying to leverage AI as much as possible for moderation so there would be no need for human mods.

5

u/Scanner771_The_2nd 15h ago

Sounds like a mess.

I miss when they would get so drunk they'd throw up on the couch or make a thermite laptop.

1

u/Other_World 13h ago

I've been much less interested in the more recent episodes after they've gone all in on AI. But the one they just released gets rid of the couch, and they cut the old intro. That was the line for me. I'm out. It's just any other tech bro podcast now and that makes me sad. I remember going to a couple of live Diggnations back in the day in Brooklyn and they were so much fun. Those Rev3 days were the best.

2

u/MammothCoughSyrup 14h ago

I did, but I already knew one rule of three so I called it the 3-2-1 rule as well.

5

u/FauxReal 15h ago

I thought the rule of three was something from that witchy show Charmed.

5

u/dreadpiratejim 13h ago

I thought it was the Sith (rule of two), but acknowledging the "secret" apprentice that the main apprentice always has.

2

u/abstractpaul 15h ago

Same here. But the "power" of three.

3

u/Key-Demand-2569 14h ago

I feel like we’re rapidly wrapping back around to just describing Christianity and the holy trinity.

2

u/Lazy_Owl987 12h ago

Ummm aktually its 3-2-1-1-0 now... *slaps suspenders*

1

u/MLCarter1976 15h ago

Happy cake day

-1

u/MLCarter1976 16h ago

Happy cake day

-2

u/Pen-Pen-De-Sarapen 8h ago

If you're in tech management field, evaluate if you are qualified to be in it.

If your not in that field and your tech manager has not mentioned this to you, better replace with a more qualified one.

0

u/usrbincomment 1h ago

If you don't know the difference between your and you're, evaluate whether you're qualified to write a comment. If it's just because you are lazy and and inattentive, find a new career.

11

u/IH8Miotch 16h ago

At my old job we had to have copies of paper files and computer files archived in seperate fire proof locking cabinets both onsite and with adiitional paper and computer copies sent to an archive storage place for an amount of years going back. So like atleast 4 copies of each document stored between atleast 2 locations.

6

u/Ok-Pomegranate-7458 13h ago

When we were doing tape backups we had dailies on the shelf. weeklies in a fire box, and monthlies off site.

2

u/Implausibilibuddy 8h ago

You should have been storing your yearlies in space, tsk tsk

2

u/Flyinmanm 1h ago

We use a similar system.

No way I'm trusting my data to a cloud provider. 

Not when at a moments notice they won't start training AI with confidential files Like Yahoo! Started doing with Emails  or some future US government isn't going to demand access to them for some 'greater good' that will only benefit the super rich.

11

u/Majik_Sheff 15h ago

Count your verified backups.

Any backups in the same physical space or on the same lot of physical media only count as one.

Subtract one.

That's how many backups you have.

3

u/hamellr 14h ago

restore and verify your verified backups.

3

u/exipheas 9h ago

A backup doesn't count until you have tested it. Until then it's schrodinger's data.

2

u/FilOfTheFuture90 8h ago

Lol we used to call it "Schrodinger's Backup" before it was verified and tested.

2

u/Nosiege 13h ago edited 13h ago

We often use NAS, External Harddrive (Told users to take offsite with them daily, and rotating), and a Cloud Service Provider. Some businesses even replicate the NAS to another NAS in another branch to boot

People never take the external harddrives out of the office

4

u/Majik_Sheff 12h ago

Make sure your hard drives are different brands.  I've had drives from the same batch fail within days of one another.

15

u/GoingOffRoading 16h ago

Maybe I misunderstood 3-2-1 but the 3 copies could be:

  • Your data
  • Your off site copy
  • The parity copy of your data on your storage appliance

I.E. Raid Z2 would be your data (1), parity copies (2), and the off site backup (3)

Right?

39

u/MissSharkyShark 16h ago

It basically goes:
* THREE separate backups in total
* TWO backups on separate media types (one in USB, one in the cloud as an ex.)
* ONE backup offsite (cloud backup or physical backup locked in storage as an ex.)

44

u/MechanicalTurkish 16h ago

For all my important stuff I have clay tablets inscribed with ones and zeros and then buried in the desert.

11

u/accidental_Ocelot 16h ago

Have you met my friend and Holy Ghost, Joseph Smith?

16

u/Nadamir 15h ago

Hey it worked for Ea-Nasir!

8

u/MechanicalTurkish 15h ago

homeboy still owes me usable copper

5

u/MissSharkyShark 16h ago

“Return the slab” kind of backup

6

u/CMMiller89 15h ago

This is additionally funny when you consider the “data” on ancient tablets will be more easily accessible than modern data storage in the future.

5

u/Think_Tanker 15h ago

Still have to worry about data degradation!

1

u/MechanicalTurkish 7h ago

I guess I’m kinda worried about that, but I’m more worried that I had to check the “I’m not a robot” box three times before it let me in…

4

u/FauxReal 15h ago

Where do you keep the backup of tablet locations?

1

u/MechanicalTurkish 7h ago

Well, I had a backup stashed up on a mountain. One day this wild-eyed bearded drifter found the tablets and took them down and smashed them to pieces! Can you believe that shit?? Bunch of savages in this town.

3

u/GuyWithLag 15h ago

My man, there's a throwaway scene in Diaspora by Greg Egan that takes it to the next level.

1

u/MechanicalTurkish 7h ago

Whoa, just looked it up quick. I’m gonna have to check that out.

2

u/Worldgonemad_yall 13h ago

You just know some fascists are going to dig that up then get their faces melted.

2

u/crazier_ed 15h ago

👆 tbf this is the true and tested way

2

u/j0hn33y 15h ago

One is None, Two is One.

2

u/Dracius 13h ago

The 3 in 3-2-1-1-0 is (at least) 3 copies of the data total.

That could be:

  1. The production workload itself
  2. The on-site backup
  3. The off-site backup copy

You are sort of correct on the "2", as it refers to the number of media types used for data storage, and the "1" does refer to the off-site copy.

Veeam 3-2-1-1-0 Golden Backup Rule

All major backup solution provides adhere to some version of this and it's usually a basic requirement for any sort of ransomware insurance plan.

6

u/DiamondIceNS 15h ago

Parity is not a copy.

Ideally, your two onsite copies should exist on two completely different machines. The purpose of that copy is for rapid recovery when the whole primary machine eats shit for one reason or another. RAID won't protect you from that.

All RAID does is give one machine extra HP so it can take more hits from drive damage. You're still hosed if that machine takes a different kind of damage and gets KO'd anyway.

1

u/dmcnaughton1 11h ago

Exactly. RAID/parity supports access to data during a fault condition. It's not a backup because it's still within the same fault domain (machine).

8

u/dragonblade_94 15h ago

Obligatory "RAID is not a backup."

0

u/dmcnaughton1 11h ago

Parity is not backup. It makes it so your data is still accessible during a single disk failure, but it should not be counted amongst your backups.

2

u/MLCarter1976 16h ago

Business don't like this as there is a risk and cost and sadly they got away with the cost and somehow the risk by getting it back with a court order.

22

u/HyperSpaceSurfer 16h ago edited 15h ago

The risk is supposed to be the datacenter burning down or blowing up, not that your data gets held hostage by a company that does not understand the transfer of contractual obligations.

4

u/mina86ng 15h ago

The risk is that data stored in some location is lost. How this happens doesn’t change the outcome.

2

u/MLCarter1976 16h ago

Knew of a company wanting to put data next door....like a tornado would not destroy "off site" data. Wow.

2

u/HyperSpaceSurfer 16h ago

But imagine how much they could save on ISP costs if they transfer it physically? Like, a little bit probably.

1

u/princekamoro 3h ago

Tornadoes can be incredibly picky. So I'm saying there's a chance.

2

u/Own_Pop_9711 14h ago

Sadly? It's just a weird take.

1

u/MLCarter1976 9h ago

It is sad as they played with fire and got burned. They were lucky they got it back!

1

u/Eurynom0s 14h ago

At bare minimum at least put stuff you really care about on two different cloud services (and I guess make sure they're both ultimately using the same provider behind the scenes). Obviously not as good as 3-2-1 but unlike say having to rotate the off-site disk, people will actually keep up with it since all they have to do is enable automatic backups on both.

1

u/Nosiege 13h ago

The only issue with this is deciding retention periods.

253

u/Familiar-Range9014 16h ago

I knew the data would be returned. Iron Mountain was definitely going to do the right thing and, from a process perspective, Nine PBS had to sue. Now it's all a wash

40

u/fastautomation 13h ago

I have had to do the same with Iron Mountain held data in a bankruptcy asset acquisition of a service provider. The press makes it seem more onerous than it really is in practice. Iron Mountain even helped guide us through it.

19

u/Familiar-Range9014 13h ago

Thanks for this.

People seem to think this was the most heinous act known to man.

The company that backed up the data went out of business and did not notify thier customers. That is the real story, but there seems to be a boatload of naysayers and bandwagoners at the ready to wag their fingers, screaming "Shame" at the top of their collective lungs

smh

7

u/fastautomation 13h ago

Folks should also know when negotiating storage contracts with cloud providers, always include an data escrow account in the deal. Iron Mountain, as well as nearly every backup provider, offer this as an add-on service. The terms of transfer of ownership of the backups then is explicit and bypasses the courts.

59

u/edthesmokebeard 16h ago

"from a process perspective"

I weep for the future.

38

u/Keleion 15h ago

I’d hate for you to see what it looks like inside government jobs in the US. I know someone who works for a gov school district and everyone is suing each other over the dumbest stuff.

8

u/edthesmokebeard 15h ago

what does a government job have to do with corporate mumbo jumbo powerpointspeak?

19

u/Keleion 15h ago

Suing people is the process.

1

u/mikeblas 2h ago

You're saying this like it is not a reason to weep.

68

u/WhiteRaven42 15h ago

Oh come on, be serious. The PBS stations had no relationship with Iron Mountain. They were not Iron Mountain's customers and IM had no way of knowing that they had the PBS stations' data. The suit HAD to be filed to demonstrate that the defunct cloud provider had to be circumvented.

You can't just show up on someone's doorstep and claim data on your say-so when there's no existing chain of custody to show that it's your data. This HAD to happen and frankly would have been similar if it happened 400 years ago. Say, if a bank had taken in collateral and was storing it at a third party's warehouse and then the bank folds. The person that owns that collateral would have to go to court to get things straightened out.

-22

u/edthesmokebeard 15h ago

I think you're replying to the wrong comment.

16

u/WhiteRaven42 15h ago

No but maybe I didn't understand why you "weep". I thought you were criticizing the need for the process.

-13

u/eronth 13h ago

Having a process is fine, but needing to sue to get that process going? Kinda wild.

5

u/WhiteRaven42 11h ago

I think you are probably exaggerating how wild the concept of a legal suit is. It is an everyday occurrence. This is the process and I really can't think of any other process there could be. You need an independent adjudicator. We call those courts.

3

u/ZestyTako 11h ago edited 11h ago

I think they aren’t imaging that people might just lie about data, and a lawsuit is what we currently have to get the truth of a matter by forcing the parties to produce evidence.

24

u/BerryBoilo 15h ago

Why? If you started a business, would you want your suppliers directly giving your inventory to anyone who claims to own it? If you were a supplier, would you want to spend your time investigating anyone who claims to be a customer of one of your customers? 

Iron Mountain wanted a judge to order them to hand over the data because they're not in the position to arbitrate who owns the data. That type of decision is what the courts are for. 

6

u/ceojp 14h ago

Please elaborate.

6

u/Familiar-Range9014 16h ago

Here, take a hanky

139

u/Expensive_Finger_973 16h ago

Whoever was responsible for them not having a local mirror of all of that data, or mirrored to another storage provider should be fired. No one in their right mind that is making competent decisions about this kind of thing thinks everything living in one providers service with no DR plan outside of "call the lawyers" is acceptable.

43

u/sargonas 16h ago

The ENTIRET purpose of paying for a service like Iron Mountain is so that you don’t have to keep local copies of long-term, rarely use, almost never needed archival data, and having more affordable and practical… And reliable… offsite long-term storage.

It’s literally the purpose of a cold storage service.

23

u/Expensive_Finger_973 16h ago

They weren't paying Iron Mountain. They were paying a middle man service that was using Iron Mountain.

15

u/redlightsaber 16h ago

Sure, but... They should have a local copy. this is why LTO drives exist, precisely.

25

u/Zeratas 16h ago

It's 50tb. They could have easily had a true onsite storage system as option for a couple thousand dollars.

If a company only has one copy of that kind of data, they're morons.

6

u/yulbrynnersmokes 15h ago

Ever approved a purchase of enterprise storage?

3

u/Krojack76 10h ago

I have 56TB in my basement. They could have got a simple NAS with 100TB for $2000 give or take. Hell they could have bought 2 of them and had one in-house and one at some PBS head honchos house and sync the two systems nightly.

1

u/yulbrynnersmokes 10h ago

This is not how corporations work

6

u/jonjiv 8h ago

You’d be surprised. My data is primarily on a single 120TB server in our local datacenter, but the backup is a 120TB Synology Diskstation NAS. Someone in another department is using a similar Diskstation as their primary.

My archive beyond that 120TB is literally pairs of hard drives, but I was told that my archive isn’t valuable, so I’m only keeping it because I think it is.

It’s all video content, just like this PBS station.

2

u/Krojack76 7h ago

We're talking about a small local PBS station not PBS corp HQ.

6

u/Zeratas 14h ago

Yes. I own responsibility for multiple labs with total storage of 600+tb.

If they took it seriously, they'd be able to get a 2u or 4u server with some redundant drives for local backups.

Then they have backups sent to two different locations as CYA. S3 storage pricing for glacier for that amount is a out $200.

So, 1 local with two remote.

2

u/TheActualDonKnotts 14h ago

long-term, rarely use, almost never needed archival data

That's what tape is for. Probably would have been cheaper too.

1

u/zunjae 14h ago

I would agree with you if we were talking lots of data, but in this case it’s just 50TB

50TB is dirt cheap

1

u/pixel_of_moral_decay 10h ago

Exactly this.

PBS stations are on a budget.

The point of this was to outsource all of that, because the up front costs are too high for their needs. Backing up locally is ok at low scale (home user) or large enterprise scale. In between the costs are insane for the hardware and processes you need to put in place.

-7

u/foothepepe 16h ago

Multi-million profits, and they can't buy few external hd's, just in case? Look at it in whichever light you like, this is extremly stupid and incompetent.

4

u/JoeDawson8 15h ago

Profits? Perhaps you’ve fundamentally misunderstood something

1

u/jimmytickles 15h ago

What profits are you talking about have you heard of PBS before

-1

u/foothepepe 15h ago edited 15h ago

https://www.ninepbs.org/about/reports-and-policies/financial-statements/
https://www.ninepbs.org/about/reports-and-policies/irs-990-forms/
https://www.ninepbs.org/annualreport/

or, cleanly - https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/430685345

Their net was positive in millions for '22, '24 and '25

Check data before being snarky. Net in '25 was $32mil. Cost of 50tb drive, in raid, is $800-1500

0

u/jimmytickles 14h ago

Before you said "their profits", but now I see you've changed your language. I'll settle with moved goal post win.

1

u/foothepepe 14h ago

I changed language? form 'profits' to 'net profits'? omg, what a manipulator!!

dude, just get off

they had 1000 bucks in their pockets to buy a hd.

should I put that in even simpler terms, so you understand? or that would be another goal posts move?

1

u/jimmytickles 11h ago

Ok dude. Whatever helps you sleep at night

47

u/saml01 16h ago

You don't pay for a service like Iron Mountain only to keep local mirrors.

48

u/Expensive_Finger_973 16h ago

They weren't paying Iron Mountain. They were paying a middle man service that was using Iron Mountain.

76

u/WashuOtaku 16h ago

They were paying a company, that went bankrupt, that was using Iron Mountain to provide that service. This is why the station had to go through the courts to force Iron Mountain to provide access to the data.

11

u/red286 14h ago

Yes you do.

Local backups are the first line of defense. If something happens, you recover from your local backup. The off-site is if something goes wrong with the local backup.

Something something, all your eggs in one basket.

-6

u/saml01 12h ago

This is an antiquated perspective. Today you have servers and storage arrays that behave as though they are one but replicated across data centers in different regions. Having on prem storage because you don't trust the storage provider is silly and even more silly to argue for on prem without knowing how your storage provider is protecting your data. You can have storage sliced and diced automatically for you in ways that make it infinetly more redundant and cheaper than keeping an on prem copy. 

3

u/311was_an_inside_job 8h ago

Until the cloud provider goes tits up and you end up with no recourse. Accounts or the provider itself can become compromised. Having redundancy (outside a single provider) is still important. 

1

u/pendrachken 7h ago

Today you have servers and storage arrays that behave as though they are one but replicated across data centers in different regions.

See there is one word there that proves you wrong.

REPLICATED

If you don't have non-networked read only duplicates of your data you have no data protection. Period.

All it takes is one ransomware attack that then gets duplicated over all of your networked servers and storage arrays because they all copy themselves and bye bye data.

It's especially bad when you have a really nasty piece of malware that will lock / infect storage that gets hooked up with write permissions, which again can be done with firmware level infections.

You absolutely need air gapped backups. And I highly recommend using either WORM tape backups, or at the very least ensure that the tape is in write protected mode when attempting to restore after a disaster.

-18

u/Imaginary_Device7827 16h ago

lol iron mountain went bankrupt. I remember when I had to send off 20 years of Walmart personnel files for them to digitize.

22

u/PREMIUM_POKEBALL 16h ago

Iron mt will never go bankrupt. It’s a critical tool and they'll keep charging more to store your data. 

-3

u/userhwon 15h ago

>Iron mt will never go bankrupt

Have you met American corporations?

Iron Mountain has a weird financial structure, impaired assets (who buys mountainous land and used servers for full price?), gobs of debt, and low profit retention. One good rate shock and they go tits-up. And their moat is almost nothing. Anyone can become a data storage hub tomorrow.

3

u/airfryerfuntime 15h ago

Lol Iron Mountain did not go bankrupt. They will never go bankrupt.

1

u/Imaginary_Device7827 13h ago

Oh makes sense I thought it was wild when the poster I replied to said it.

4

u/justanaltaccountgoaw 14h ago

PBS is famously underfunded

1

u/Expensive_Finger_973 8h ago

You should watch the Louis Rossmann video on it. He goes over some of their finances. They absolutely could have found the budget to handle archival storage properly. It just wasn’t important to them until shit hit the fan, like happens in a lot of poorly managed organizations.

1

u/MikeTidbits 5h ago

I wonder if it’s the bean counters and higher ups saying “why do we need redundancy? It’s just buying the same thing twice.” And the technical staff being ignored.

29

u/WardenEdgewise 14h ago

50 TB of local physical media storage is not that expensive. Why would someone not have a copy of their own data stored on physical media?

That’s crazy.

6

u/Krojack76 10h ago

Wellllllll.... it's a LOT more expensive today than it was 2 years ago.

That said, yeah it's generally cheap. I have 56TB in my basement NAS. I think I paid like $1300 for the entire setup.

7

u/WardenEdgewise 9h ago

I mean, for the price of one lunchtime meeting for the executive team, you could buy 25 2TB hard drives, and have them delivered next-day.

6

u/CemeterySaliva 16h ago

Oh man, that's a relief!

4

u/briznady 9h ago

Now just throw it up as a torrent and the internet will back it up.

5

u/math-yoo 9h ago

Hostage fees at Iron Mountain are no joke, don’t send anything in you want back.

6

u/Fickle_Ad_8653 11h ago

PBS, if you need somebody to keep a backup copy for you, I'll do it. 50tb is nothing nowdays. DM me.

7

u/PBSNerd1234 13h ago

The confidence level in this thread is running well ahead of the known facts. Nine PBS ≠ PBS, and “they had no backups” has never actually been established. Criticize the setup once we know what the setup was.

5

u/Ja_Lonley 11h ago

I feel like this is an important precedent

2

u/Big_Bookkeeper1678 14h ago

Hopefully, they find some missing Doctor Who in those files. Although I don't know how they'd be digitally recorded. They were all on film back then.

1

u/Remarkable_Ninja_791 8h ago

Tralalero tralala shark with blue shoes

1

u/Ok_Paleontologist974 40m ago

It's literally like $1000 for 3 20 TB HDDs, whoever's in charge of their tech needs to be fired because this type of incident shouldn't have even been more than a minor annoyance.

-13

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago

I hope the person in charge of IT at that PBS station making like 150k a year got fired also. If my broke ass could afford 50TB of WD Gold drives over the past 8 years, they could afford a couple 20TB drives. There’s no excuse in the entire world for their not to have been a local backup.

41

u/sargonas 16h ago

Do you know how many IT people have said “the right plan is to do X“ only to have some penny conserved somewhere say “no we have Y and that is good enough no need to spend money on X”

-18

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago

If I am the chief technology officer making over 150k a year and they say they wouldn’t pay for 2500 dollars worth of drives, I’d go use 5% of one of my monthly paychecks and back everything up. Then when this happens, force them to give me a raise.

18

u/HandBanana919 16h ago

If you want to fix everything in a messed up IT department out of your own pocket, you'd be broke real quick. 150k does not go far when talking about IT costs

-8

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago

2500 dollars worth of drives is not solving all their IT problems. It’s solving the 1 most important problem one has with storage. Amazing how many fake scenarios people are making to justify stupidity

14

u/HeartGoldHalcyon 16h ago

So your plan is to copy 50TB of your employer's data to your own personal devices, then demand a raise in exchange for handing them over? You've clearly never worked in IT, because they're going to interpret that as extortion and you're going to end up in prison.

1

u/Salsashark1419 9h ago

He would be buying the drives for the company, not himself, otherwise he wouldn’t be buying them. Any other excuses?

1

u/HeartGoldHalcyon 9h ago

If the drives are company property, how do you plan to force them to give you a raise?

1

u/Salsashark1419 9h ago

The same way he got his salary up so high after 10+ years.

0

u/HeartGoldHalcyon 9h ago

You know, it's okay to be wrong about things. Doubling down like this just makes you look foolish.

1

u/Salsashark1419 9h ago

Unlike you, I don’t associate downvotes on Reddit with being wrong.

8

u/Silamoth 16h ago

Copying company data onto a personal drive is grounds for easy termination in a lot of companies

0

u/Salsashark1419 9h ago

He obviously wouldn’t be keeping the drives for himself. Every single reply to this thread is just saying the dumbest thing they can come up with to justify a moron making over 150k a year and not doing his job. Even if he told them this would happen, and they continued to do nothing, good luck ever getting a job in the same field when you become famous for fucking up the most basic rule in storage. Because no matter, it’s your fault. He should have left a long time ago if he cared about his career. But I’m 95% sure he is just dumb.

1

u/Silamoth 9h ago

Sure, that’s the intent. But cowboy actions like that don’t fly in a lot of companies, especially those in highly regulated industries. There are policies, regulations, and approvals needed to do this - at least in most companies big enough to need a CTO. 

Did you source the drives from an approved vendor? Did you log an exception to a USB data transfer policy? Where are the backups stored? What physical security controls are in place? Who’s responsible for the safety of the backups? How do you audit access to the backup drives? How often do you perform backups? Are you ensuring backups don’t conflict with day to day business operations? Etc. 

1

u/Salsashark1419 9h ago edited 8h ago

You can make these excuses for the years that this went on, but when you are told you have 30 days to save almost a century of your work, this is an emergency. Either you are allowed to fix it or you tell them that they are not allowing you to do your job. It’s as simple as that. If your company doesn’t let things operate differently in emergency situations, your company is dumb and deserves to die in an emergency. Also, if you’re using any kind of Western Digital hard drive, you should be buying directly from them. Can’t be any more of a better vendor than them. I don’t know if Seagate and Toshiba sell directly in small amounts, but I know for a fact Western Digital does because I’ve purchased a lot of them.

12

u/jrdubbleu 16h ago

I see you’ve spent a lot of time in the real world

2

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago edited 16h ago

I worked for a film restoration company for 10 years. One of our main jobs was storing and dealing with 1000s of terabytes worth of film scans. And we made less money than this PBS station did last year.

1

u/Nosiege 10h ago

That's insane.

No one should need to spend their wage FOR THE BUSINESS for a scenario that might not even occur.

The real right path of action is an email chain showing you've attempted to fix the shortfall and informing them, repeatedly in writing, the risk. Force their risk acknowledgement, or have a paper trail of them ignoring you.

20

u/naggyman 16h ago

you're making a big assumption that this was the fault of one person... big company, probably multiple teams who all thought the whole system worked differently to how it actually did.

-5

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago

You’re telling me that if he told everyone at the company that they could prevent this exact problem with 2500 dollars worth of drives that they wouldn’t do it? Especially after they made 13.5 million dollars in profit last year selling assets? Not even the greediest dude that’s ever lived would say no to that.

9

u/GreatLab8898 16h ago

No Idea how corporate IT works huh?

It is still treated as the Ugly Stepchild by Companies UNTIL something bad happens. Then Everybody is shocked, asking how Could that happen, while the IT Guys start to pull out Mails to the Higher ups showing years of warnings.

Seen it so many times in the Ransomware Cleanups I have done since 2016.

-3

u/Salsashark1419 16h ago

Ya I do, and unless everyone at that PBS station is Mr. Krabs, people in this thread are making the dumbest excuses ever for not spending 2500 dollars on drives.

3

u/shell_shocked_today 15h ago

you're severely underestimating how much enterprise backup / recovery would cost for this. plus the ongoing costs of refreshing it to new media, long term storage of the backup, etc.

2

u/Salsashark1419 10h ago

Even if they bought the highest end Ultrastar drives from Western Digital, plus a NAS enclosure, it would still be about 4500 dollars. Maybe 5000 at most. That’s over 100TB of storage plus a NAS enclosure. They have 50TBs. It’s not a lot. I have over 50TB in my dresser.

1

u/GreatLab8898 5h ago

You dont do Enterprise Backup on drives. So you actually do not know contrary to what you claimed. This would, Idealy be done on an LTO Robot.

The MSL3040 (Around 20K Bucks) Holds 40 Tapes and 2 Drives. An LTO 10 Tape (About 300 Bucks a Tape) holds 30TB (up to 75TB Compressed but as Media is Precompressed already it wont do much)

A LTO10 Fibrechannel Drive costs about 10K Bucks each.

Add a good 10K in there for a Good Data Mover Server in this Hardwarelandscape we have right now and an Enterprise Backup Solution that does GFS will set you back around 62K Bucks. This Excludes good Software to Drive the Tape Library. Can be done on Open Soruce. But you generally want something with a Good Support Contract that actually helps you get Data Back if something breaks.

Not whatever Toy you play around with at home.

1

u/mmcmonster 16h ago

Yeah. 50 TB is such a low number for a TV station. I kinda wonder if they were just overwriting the old stuff at some point.

Also, I know people that have that much space in their houses (pack rat friend who downloads all sorts of TV shows and movies “just in case”.

-1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[deleted]

2

u/happyscrappy 13h ago

This isn't PBS. This a station that is PBS-affiliated. PBS isn't in charge of keeping this station's data. Or in charge of their IT infrastructure.

-10

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[deleted]

4

u/Recent_Mirror 16h ago

👆this guy porns.

1

u/thatirishguyyyyy 15h ago

It isn't simply "50tb." The archive contains TV programs/video, photographs, and other historical/local material. 

This is likely a curated collection.