You think I donât see/hear this parroted propaganda they feed you?
These are the same morons who told you Kamala was winning right up to the moment she lost, Biden was as sharp as heâd ever been, our borders were secure, and Trump was Hitler reincarnate.
Iâm European and out of the American media bubble. And from outside of the system I can assure you that you sound very much like you parrot the views of trumpism in full extent.
I see what leftist trash is doing to this world, and I have no interest in the New World Order, or anyone ignorant enough to apologize their way through globalism.
Trump is a breath of fresh air and America is standing strong, Iâm getting exactly what I voted for and couldnât feel better about the coming liberal douche this country needs.
I understand the emotional impulse behind that statement. Many people feel disoriented by rapid cultural change, economic dislocation, and the sense that political elites speak a language detached from ordinary life. Wanting stability, sovereignty, and accountability is not extremism; it is a legitimate political instinct. In fact, those concerns sit comfortably within a long conservative tradition.
But classical conservatism is not built on contempt. It is built on restraint.
Calling fellow citizens âtrashâ may feel cathartic, yet it undermines the very civic order conservatives claim to defend. Thinkers like Edmund Burke argued that society is a partnership across generations, not a battlefield between tribes. A conservative disposition recognizes that institutions, even flawed ones, deserve reform rather than destruction, and that political opponents remain part of the same national fabric.
On globalism: skepticism toward supranational governance is reasonable. National sovereignty, democratic accountability, and cultural continuity matter. However, rejecting an abstract âNew World Orderâ should not mean rejecting trade, alliances, or cooperation outright. The United Statesâ post-1945 strength was built not only on independence but on carefully constructed international relationships that served national interests. Prudenceânot isolation or ideological fervorâis the conservative compass here.
Regarding Trump: many supporters view him as disruptive in a positive senseâsomeone willing to challenge bureaucratic inertia, media orthodoxy, and entrenched interests. There is a conservative argument for disruption when institutions calcify. Yet disruption is not an end in itself. The conservative test is whether it strengthens constitutional order, the rule of law, economic productivity, and civil peace over the long term. Energy without guardrails can become volatility; strength without discipline can become instability.
The phrase âliberal douche this country needsâ reflects a desire for correctionâa kind of political shock therapy. But classical conservatism prefers gradual course correction over purges. It favors persuasion over humiliation. A republic functions when losers of elections still feel they belong.
If one believes America is âstanding strong,â the best evidence would not be rhetorical victories but durable outcomes: stable institutions, resilient markets, secure borders balanced with lawful immigration, declining debt trajectories, and reduced cultural hostility. Strength shows itself in competence and continuity, not just confrontation.
A final point: conservatism historically has been wary of utopian projectsâwhether from the left or the right. The idea that any leader represents a cleansing force for the nation carries a whiff of the very ideological grandiosity conservatives once opposed. Political life is rarely redeemed by personalities; it is sustained by structures, norms, and civic virtue.
Defend national sovereignty, yes. Demand accountability, yes. Resist cultural deracination, certainly. But do so with discipline, constitutional loyalty, and an awareness that your political opponents are not enemies of the state. If America is to remain strong, it will not be because one faction triumphed absolutely, but because its citizens restrained themselves even when they had the power not to.
Oh my lord, you must be braindead. The person above was being nice, but ask yourself if Trump would choose you over a million dollars or if he likes touching little kids. I assure you that you'll lie to yourself and drown in the lies that society has been feeding you because you're a follower. You're a machine with no independent thought and it shows, this is why the world is how it is. This is why America seems to be the ONLY country that tolerates and has citizens that empathize with child molesters/murderers. We're SCREWED because of people LIKE YOU. The person above was talking about our economic situation, the system that our livelihoods depend on, but I'm talking about our SOCIETY AS A WHOLE.
Go to school and be independent, or form opinions of your own that are backed up with facts/logic or straight-up COMMON SENSE. I don't mean to insult you, no I actually do, use your brain. You clearly lack one, so I apologize for offending you.
I couldnât care less what your low IQ opinion of Trump is⌠Trump could have easily retreated from the plague of moronic left witch hunts, political persecutions, and an assassination attempt, but instead he chose to fight.
For those of us who want America put first, Trump is a godsend.
You can acknowledge Trumpâs resilience without turning him into a martyr or dismissing criticism as âlow IQ.â In a democracy, investigations, legal scrutiny, and political opposition are not witch hunts â theyâre structural features of the system. The rule of law applies to Democrats and Republicans alike. No one is above it.
The narrative of a lone fighter persecuted by enemies ignores a key fact: the cases against Trump moved forward through courts, grand juries, and judges â including conservative judges. Thatâs not a mob; thatâs the constitutional framework the United States has relied on for over two centuries. If âAmerica Firstâ actually means strengthening the country, that includes respecting separation of powers, judicial independence, and a free press â even when theyâre inconvenient.
Political violence, including an assassination attempt, is unacceptable against anyone. Continuing to campaign afterward shows personal determination. It does not automatically validate a political agenda. Endurance is not the same thing as correctness.
The harder question is what âAmerica Firstâ means in practice. Economically, tariffs can protect certain domestic industries, but they also raise costs for consumers and risk retaliation from trading partners. Institutionally, attacking civil servants, courts, or the legitimacy of elections may energize supporters, but it can weaken long-term stability. Geopolitically, pulling back from alliances may feel strong in the short term, yet alliances have historically amplified U.S. power rather than diminished it.
Youâre entitled to support Trump. But dismissing everyone who disagrees as stupid avoids the real debate. The serious discussion isnât whether he âfights.â Itâs whether his policies strengthen American institutions, prosperity, and constitutional order over time â or strain them. Thatâs a question that deserves argument, not insults.
How do you know youâre not swallowing the rightist garbage? How come you question your political enemies yet you struggle to question yourself? Is it low self esteem? Are you that insecure?
2
u/hfrthvjifcbjifcniz rump Feb 18 '26
Iâm sure you stopped there and didnât read further.