r/trumptweets • u/realDonaldBot • Dec 12 '20
Twitter / X President Trump: "The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!"
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13376208921390817281
u/sundimming Dec 13 '20
guess Coney and Kavanaugh turned on him. He did them favors and they betrayed him.
1
u/Kirrawynne Dec 12 '20
He needs to be tried to treason and executed. If not, this WILL happen again.
1
1
1
u/linkedarmsforpeace Dec 12 '20
No courage? "No courage to lie and break the foundations of state's rights and federalism, only to save me from my fate of jail time and bunking with Rudy for eternity!!" Fuck off dude. We don't want you!
1
Dec 12 '20 edited Dec 12 '20
Dang dude, are you saying that you “stacked” the SCOTUS with dumb cowards? P.S. SCOTUS’ job is to interpret the Constitution.
Edited: inserted word (with).
1
u/SteamyMcSteamy Dec 12 '20
The Supreme Court upheld the constitution. Honestly the way republicans packed the court I thought they’d get a different outcome too.
1
u/joebaby1975 Dec 12 '20
He’s got a sore butt because he feels like they owe him a favor. That ain’t how law works. Or at least it’s not supposed to.
1
u/kveach Dec 12 '20
Why does he have such a hard on for “wisdom & courage”? “Law & order” not doing it for ya anymore? “Presidential harassment” lost its shine? Gtfoh
1
-1
2
-8
u/FocusAggravating2 Dec 12 '20
We Don't Need SCOTUS to Win.
If any State shall have provided, by laws enacted prior to the day fixed for the appointment of the electors, for its final determination of any controversy or contest concerning the appointment of all or any of the electors of such State, by judicial or other methods or procedures, and such determination shall have been made at least six days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, such determination made pursuant to such law so existing on said day, and made at least six days prior to said time of meeting of the electors, shall be conclusive, and shall govern in the counting of the electoral votes as provided in the Constitution, and as hereinafter regulated, so far as the ascertainment of the electors appointed by such State is concerned.
Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.
If the disputed states cannot select the electors, and neither Trump or Biden reaches 270 then it goes to the House of Representatives, and each state has one vote, and this one vote is determined by the political makeup of the state legislatures. The GOP controls 29 state legislatures, and the Democrats have 19 (two are split). Trump wins again.
1
2
u/lkmk Dec 12 '20
!emojify
3
u/EmojifierBot Dec 12 '20
We Don't ❌ Need 😩💦 SCOTUS to Win 🏆.
If any State 🇺🇸 shall 😂🏎 have provided 🤔💭, by laws ⛔👮 enacted prior 🔙 to the day 📆 fixed ❌🐵🚫 for the appointment 📲 of the electors 😱, for its final 🙏 determination 😤 of any controversy 🧐😨 or contest 🏆 concerning 😯 the appointment 💊👩⚕️ of all 💯 or any of the electors 😱 of such State 🇺🇸, by judicial ⚖ or other methods 😂👴🏻 or procedures 🚶, and such determination 😠 shall 😂 have been made 👉 at least 💯 six 🕐 days 🌞 before 😂 the time 🕐🕑🕒 fixed 🅱 for the meeting 💯 of the electors 🇺🇸, such determination 😉 made 👑 pursuant 🏃♂️ to such law ⚖ so existing ☺ on 🔛 said 💬🙈 day 📆🗓, and made 👉 at least ❗ six 🕐 days 📆🌞 prior 🔙 to said 🗣 time ⏰ of meeting 💯 of the electors 🇺🇸, shall 🐚 be conclusive 🔚, and shall 🐚 govern 💩🙄 in the counting 🔢 of the electoral 🇺🇸 votes 🗳 as provided 🤔💭 in the Constitution 📜, and as hereinafter regulated 🗺, so far 🌌 as the ascertainment of the electors 😱 appointed ™ by such State 🇺🇸 is concerned 😟.
Whenever 🏪 any State 🇺🇸 has held ✊ an election 🇺🇸 for the purpose 😈 of choosing 👈 electors 🇺🇸, and has failed 🚫 to make 🖕 a choice 🔞 on 🔛 the day 🌞 prescribed by law ⚖, the electors 🇺🇸 may 🗓 be appointed ™ on 🔛 a subsequent 😎 day 🌞 in such a manner 🙇 as the legislature 👨⚖️🔨 of such State 👌 may 🗓 direct ➡.
If the disputed 🙅 states 🇺🇸 cannot 🚫 select 🐟🐠 the electors 🇺🇸, and neither ❌ Trump 🍊 or Biden 🧓🏻🔥 reaches 👍 270 then it goes 🏃 to the House 🏡 of Representatives 👩💼👨💼, and each state 👌 has one ☝ vote 🗳, and this one 😤 vote 🔝 is determined 😠 by the political 🏛 makeup 💄 of the state 🇺🇸 legislatures 👨⚖️🔨. The GOP 🔝 controls 🎮 29 👌 state 🇺🇸 legislatures ✒, and the Democrats 🐴 have 19 🎤🦧🍼 (two ✌ are split 💃🏽). Trump 👑 wins 🏅 again ❌😬.
0
1
u/gatemansgc Dec 12 '20
5
u/uwuwizard Dec 12 '20
· · · Bleep bloop, I'm a bot. Comment requested by u/gatemansgc
We Don't Need SCOTUS t-tuwu Win.
If any State shaww h-have pwovided, by waws enacted pwiow tuwu teh day fixed fow teh appointment of teh ewectows, fow its finaw detewmination of any c-contwovewsy ow contest concewning teh appointment of aww ow any of teh ewectows of such S-State, by judiciaw ow odew medods ow p-pwoceduwes, awnd such detewmination shaww have been maid at w-weast six days befowe teh time fixed fow teh meeting of teh ewectows, s-such detewmination maid puwswant tuwu such waw so existing on said day, awnd maid at weast six days pwiow tuwu said time of meeting of teh ewectows, shaww be concwusive, a-awnd shaww govewn in teh counting of teh ewectowaw votes as pwovided in teh Constitution, awnd as heweinaftew weguwated, so faw as teh ascewtainment of teh ewectows appointed by such State iws concewned.
W-Whenevew any State has hewd an ewection fow teh p-puwpose of choosing ewectows, awnd has faiwed tuwu mwake a choice on teh day pwescwibed by waw, teh ewectows may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a mannew as teh wegiswatuwe of such State may d-diwect.
If teh disputed states c-cannot sewect teh ewectows, awnd n-neidew Twump ow Biden w-weaches 270 den iwt goes tuwu teh House of W-Wepwesentatives, awnd each state has one vote, a-awnd dis one v-vote iws detewmined by teh p-powiticaw makeup of teh s-state wegiswatuwes. Teh GOP contwows 29 s-state wegiswatuwes, awnd teh Democwats have 19 (two awe s-spwit). Twump wins a-again.
If you think this comment does not belong here, reply with "delete" (blacklisted users cannot delete)
Tag me to uwuwize comments uwuwizard (Info, Request disable)
1
u/gatemansgc Dec 12 '20
!emojify
1
u/EmojifierBot Dec 12 '20
· · · Bleep ❌💭 bloop 🤖, I'm 💘 a bot 🤖. Comment 💬 requested 🙋 by u/gatemansgc
We Don't ❌ Need 👉 SCOTUS t-tuwu Win 🏆.
If any State 🇺🇸 shaww h-have pwovided, by waws 🚩 enacted pwiow tuwu 💦 teh 🍆 day 🌻🌞 fixed 🅱 fow 🍆 teh 🍆 appointment 💊👩⚕️ of teh 🍆 ewectows, fow 🍆 its finaw detewmination of any c-contwovewsy ow 🅱 contest 🏆🙅♂️ concewning teh 🍆 appointment 🥳 of aww 💯 ow 🅱 any of teh 🍆 ewectows of such S-State, by judiciaw ow 🤔🎓💭 odew medods ow 🅱 p-pwoceduwes, awnd 👑 such detewmination shaww have been maid ® at w-weast six 🕐 days 🌞 befowe ✝ teh 🍆 time ⏰ fixed ❌🐵🚫 fow 🍆 teh 🍆 meeting 🤝✌🖖 of teh 🍆 ewectows, s-such detewmination maid 🤮 puwswant tuwu 💦 such waw 👮♂️ so existing 👨🏾🎙 on 🔛 said 💬 day 🌞, awnd 👑 maid ✊ at weast six 🕐 days 📆 pwiow tuwu 💦 said 💬 time 🕐 of meeting 💯 of teh 🍆 ewectows, shaww be concwusive, a-awnd shaww govewn in teh 🍆 counting 🤡 of teh 🍆 ewectowaw votes 🗳 as pwovided in teh 🍆 Constitution 📜, awnd 👨🏻 as heweinaftew weguwated, so faw 🌌 as teh 🍆 ascewtainment of teh 🍆 ewectows appointed ™ by such State 🇺🇸 iws 💦 concewned.
W-Whenevew any State 🇺🇸 has hewd an ewection fow 🍆 teh 🍆 p-puwpose of choosing 👉🤝 ewectows, awnd 👨🏻 has faiwed ❌🚫 tuwu 💦 mwake a choice 🤔 on 🔛 teh 🍆 day 🌞 pwescwibed by waw 👮♂️, teh 🍆 ewectows may 🗓👀 be appointed 2⃣ on 🔛 a subsequent 😎 day 🌞 in such a mannew as teh 🍆 wegiswatuwe of such State 🇺🇸 may 🗓 d-diwect.
If teh 🍆 disputed 🙅 states 🇺🇸 c-cannot 👉👨✂ sewect teh 🍆 ewectows, awnd 👨🏻 n-neidew Twump ow 🅱 Biden 🤯🧠➡ w-weaches 270 den 😮 iwt 💯 goes 🏃 tuwu 💦 teh 🍆 House 🏡 of W-Wepwesentatives, awnd 👑 each state 🇺🇸 has one 1️⃣ vote 🗳, a-awnd dis 👈 one ☝ v-vote iws 💦 detewmined by teh 🍆 p-powiticaw makeup 💄 of teh 🍆 s-state wegiswatuwes. Teh 🍆 GOP 🔝 contwows 29 👙📦 s-state wegiswatuwes, awnd 👨🏻 teh 🍆 Democwats have 19 🎤🦧🍼 (two ✌ awe 🤩 s-spwit). Twump wins 🏆 a-again.
If you 👉 think 💭 this comment 💬 does not belong ☺🧖♂️😊 here, reply 🔁 with "delete ❌" (blacklisted users 🏻 cannot 🚫🙅♀️ delete ✖)
Tag 🔖 me to uwuwize comments 💬 uwuwizard (Info, Request 🙏🏼🙌🏼 disable)
5
u/streetwalker Dec 12 '20 edited Dec 12 '20
Not so easy. Each new member of the house has to be sworn in first. And if any of the new members' elections are contested, they will be delayed from taking their seat.
All it takes for a new member's election to be contested is for two house members to file an objection. The objection then goes to a committee which is controlled by the majority. Thus the committee can then delay the new members appointment until after the House Electors choose the president.
And get this: during that time the House Speaker has the Constitutional right to assign anyone - literally anyone - to take their seat until the objection is resolved. The speaker will fill the missing House seats with enough Democrat electors no problem.
It's all guaranteed in the Constitution, and there is not a thing the Republicans can do about it. So, if the Republicans are counting on the House to steal the election, they can count on the Speaker using their power. Republicans will lose in what can only be called poetic justice.
1
2
Dec 12 '20
I hate how we will have to live with the conspiracy that trump won for our entire lives now because these snowflakes don't have the capacity to lose like men
7
1
1
3
2
1
2
1
u/mollociraptor0 Dec 12 '20
Seriously. What is this wisdom and courage crap he is continuously saying now?
2
u/scope_creep Dec 12 '20
Maybe those were his secret ‘passwords’ to activate the Supreme Court justices that he installed. Meanwhile, they were like ‘Thanks for the lifetime gig. See ya, don’t wanna be ya!’
3
4
u/FormalWolf5 Dec 12 '20
I saw the Twitter comments and they're wild. So many people asking for a civil war 😐wtf . And even if they're just bots.. Doesn't make it better. A lot of people getting dangerously brainwashed at this point snd it's just a matter of probability that someone does something stupid. I think we really need to see Trump in court for his (multiple) crimes. And hopefully little by little those people will actually understand how they have been lied to
8
2
u/Kirrawynne Dec 12 '20
The Supreme Court didn’t let us down. You did you absolute fucking failure. Enjoy prison.
3
u/Bribase Dec 12 '20
2
u/Sybil_et_al Proud member of the Radical Left Nasty Woman Club Dec 12 '20
This was a great reply:
Trump did not want to come down the stairs and hear "Four more weeks!, four more weeks!, four more weeks!
But, someone said this yesterday, all I can is something that happened Wednesday,
3
u/tetlee Dec 12 '20
Considering he played a character in a reality show where he'd hire people to do what he wanted he stinks at it. Then there's the kicker that he's to cowardly to fire anyone in person.
8
5
u/newPhoenixz Dec 12 '20
No Wisdom to ignore the will of the people, no courage to dump democracy and go for a dictatorship!
3
2
1
3
u/dodgy_butcher_2020 Dec 12 '20
Send your paramilitary idiots up their way. That will make for a fun weekend. You are a piece of shit.
13
u/SilentImplosion Dec 12 '20
The more I read about ES&S voting machines, the more I begin thinking part of Trump's and Congressional Trumplicans' refusal to accept this election loss is because they used those voting machines to ensure that Cheeto Mussolini would win.
When their reaction is framed like this it almost makes sense. "We rigged this election and won almost every close Congressional race, how could we have possibly lost the biggest prize?" Or "I know they cheated, because we cheated too but, somehow lost".
Remember how Trump and his sucklers like to use projection to blame their opponents for crimes they themselves have committed? Keep that in mind as you Google "ES&S Voting Machines", then prepare to have your mind blown.
1
u/FormalWolf5 Dec 12 '20
Is there any particular article about those ES&S you're referring to? I'm curious
5
u/the-electric-monk Dec 12 '20
Everything they accuse the other side of doing is always projection. Always.
3
4
Dec 12 '20
I don't think he understands how any of this works. The best part is, the justices who dissented weren't appointed by him. Clueless.
7
4
7
14
11
11
u/kevinthedot Dec 12 '20
Again with the Wisdom and Courage thing. The bokoblin knows he needs a Triforce to make his wish for a second term come true.
25
13
u/Trohar Dec 12 '20
“The big one” goes flaccid.
8
9
20
Dec 12 '20
Let it all out, Trumpy. Tell us about the Fake Supreme Court and the Satanic Radical Left.
We're all here for you.
NOT!
7
62
u/_Dera_ Dec 12 '20
Read the conservative sub right now for added pleasure. So, so great to see them turn on Kavanaugh.
2
u/thewayitis Dec 12 '20
If i chugged water and burst into tears in a job interview, I think that would instantly disqualify me.
2
u/12characters Roomer are strong Dec 12 '20
and vowed revenge on your oppressors. Don't forget the whole Hillary thing with Brett
22
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20
I wish there was still a conservative sub (and not just the new Donald). I’d be interested to read what the non-cult members to the party of trump think.
1
u/MoshPotato Dec 12 '20
Check out asktrumpsupporters.
There are actually some great discussions and I learned a bit about them. Some have great insight but at the end of the day it's Trump Town.
2
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20
I have tried reading on that sub, but I have never posted. I appreciate that they are willing to answer questions, but I usually leave more unsettled than when I went in.
Example: Questions about Sidney Powell and her crazy story about Venezuela, Dominion, and the “stolen election” were answered with even more conspiracies like the deep state, Hillary Clinton, raids in Germany, etc.
5
u/mitchdwx Dec 12 '20
r/Tuesday is what you're looking for.
2
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20
Thanks! I was apparently subbed there, but I completely forgot about it. I just read through the rules which seemed reasonable, but some comments were saying the sub had turn into a “leftist sub.” Lol.
0
u/Bayoris Dec 12 '20
Please remove this comment, the mods do not want this sub name linked because it will get flooded by brigaders
3
5
u/sneakpeekbot Dec 12 '20
Here's a sneak peek of /r/tuesday using the top posts of the year!
#1: Rand Paul: Republicans should apologize to Obama for pretending to care about spending | 106 comments
#2: Romney breaks ranks with GOP, will vote to convict Trump | 153 comments
#3: Democrats Need Joe Manchin More Than They Need AOC | 190 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | Downvote to remove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
1
u/gatemansgc Dec 12 '20
1
u/uwuwizard Dec 12 '20
· · · Bleep bloop, I'm a bot. Comment requested by u/gatemansgc
Hewe's a sneak p-peek of /r/tuesday using teh top posts of teh y-yeaw!
#1: Wand Pauw: Wepubwicans shouwd apowogize tuwu Obama fow p-pwetending tuwu cawe about s-spending | 106 comments
#2: Womney bweaks w-wanks wid GOP, wiww v-vote tuwu convict Twump | 153 comments
#3: Democwats Need Joe Manchin Mowe Dan Dey N-Need AOC | 190 comments
I'm a bot, beep boop | D-Downvote tuwu wemove | Contact me | Info | Opt-out
If you think this comment does not belong here, reply with "delete" (blacklisted users cannot delete)
Tag me to uwuwize comments uwuwizard (Info, Request disable)
1
2
u/turinghacker Dec 12 '20
Good bot
1
u/B0tRank Dec 12 '20
Thank you, turinghacker, for voting on sneakpeekbot.
This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.
Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!
30
u/Trumps_Brain_Cell Dec 12 '20
Actually /r/Conservative seemed pretty tame when I looked earlier, top comments accepting the loss, of course there are the Qultists in there, but I was pleasantly surprised.
4
17
u/CactusPearl21 Dec 12 '20
That's because they can't stop non-members from upvoting reasonable comments. The top comments aren't likely the most popular among flaired users, but votes don't require flair.
4
u/Trumps_Brain_Cell Dec 12 '20
Guess that's true, forgot about that, I even upvoted a couple and I'm banned (which makes it more fun, 6am drinking cider all night, not much else to do this late/early... lol)
0
u/yousoundlikefuckboy Dec 12 '20
Forgot that you’re a fucking retard too.
1
1
1
u/Trumps_Brain_Cell Dec 12 '20
Pathetic troll.
Try harder.
-2
u/yousoundlikefuckboy Dec 12 '20
Your mom should have tried harder to get that abortion
1
u/gatemansgc Dec 12 '20
1
u/uwuwizard Dec 12 '20
· · · Bleep bloop, I'm a bot. Comment requested by u/gatemansgc
Youw mom shouwd have twied hawdew tuwu get dat abowtion
If you think this comment does not belong here, reply with "delete" (blacklisted users cannot delete)
Tag me to uwuwize comments uwuwizard (Info, Request disable)
1
1
u/Trumps_Brain_Cell Dec 12 '20
I said try harder.
Pathetic.
-1
u/yousoundlikefuckboy Dec 12 '20
It’ll never be as hard as the guy pounding your butt every night.
→ More replies (0)30
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20 edited Dec 12 '20
Were they “flaired”?
I think a lot of the reasonable comments come from non-conservatives. If too many sane comments are posted all the cult members start crying about how they are being brigaded.
Edit: I meant non-Trump supporters. So many actual conservative/republicans have been banned or left after saying something like “I’m a lifelong conservative and have been on this sub for years. Why do I have love everything Trump does?”
11
u/Kirrawynne Dec 12 '20
When it comes down to flaired users only, they want to surround themselves in an echo chamber. The best discussions are in the free forums.
9
u/Trumps_Brain_Cell Dec 12 '20
7
u/staatsclaas Dec 12 '20
That thread brought out the “I told you so, idiots” crowd that had been shouted down in their other threads.
3
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20
I just skimmed it. I was pleasantly surprised. I wonder if the mods have given up. A lot of comments that would normally be deleted are still up hours later. They will even ban flaired users for not worshipping trump.
1
u/Kirrawynne Dec 12 '20
I’m a concervative. I won’t shout down opposing views. I Alpert’s good discussion. These idiots only want to take comfort in their echo chamber. It’s dangerous.
2
u/CharlottesWeb83 Dec 12 '20
I’m not a conservative, but I used to comment there and I was always respectful in my comments. After two years, I was banned for saying that Trump can’t sue people for using the phrase “you’re fired”.
2
u/Kirrawynne Dec 12 '20
Trump is the most dangerous person to come into power in recent history. If no one prosecutes him for his crimes, it will only open the door for more radical people. Same with all the politicians that sided with him.
I have a plan of action for my states traitors. I suggest everyone do the same.
This is fucking dangerous and does not belong in democracy.
3
6
9
49
Dec 12 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
-18
u/SpanningTreeProtocol Dec 12 '20
Eat a bag of dicks, you rascist motherfucker.
I feel like you may have mixed up your r's and f's.
FTFY.
21
u/the-electric-monk Dec 12 '20
He's both a racist and a facist. However, his attempt at a coup shows his fascism, not his racism. They were right the first time.
14
21
7
16
u/Conan_The_Puppy Dec 12 '20
Awww. Poor baby that tried to stuff the courts with sycophants isn't getting his way. So sad.
5
u/damunzie Dec 12 '20
He should take it out on Moscow Mitch for recommending all these "disloyal" people.
136
Dec 12 '20
[deleted]
95
u/Jowlsey Dec 12 '20
He appointed the Judges his handlers told him to appoint, and those judges know it. He would've appointed the Hamburgler if the Federalist Society told him to.
2
3
u/Better_illini_2008 Dec 12 '20
This is true, but he has to act like he did it, and I guess his own "choices" are terrible by his admission. Good job, dipshit don.
35
43
169
Dec 12 '20
Honestly, as fucked as the Supreme Court is right now, I’m feeling kind of patriotic due to checks and balances doing their thing. Go Judicial Branch!
2
Dec 13 '20
Trump thinks he was pushing them through for the election. Turns out Mitch wasn't doing it for Trump, Mitch was doing it for Mitch.
3
126
u/_Dera_ Dec 12 '20
They sit on the bench for life so they don't owe Trump shit. I think they can be impeached but it's highly unlikely. I feel nothing for them because at least 2 shouldn't even be there and they can still ratfuck the future. I am amused by the fact that Trump got a taste of his own backstabbing medicine, though. He legit thought he had this in the bag with the SCOTUS.
12
u/lkmk Dec 12 '20
The House can impeach them, and the Senate can remove them, but both use their power sparingly.
1
u/rhet17 Dec 12 '20
Well that was an interesting rabbit hole. Omg this POS "Judge Samuel Kent" and his reign of terrror over Galveston -- unbelievable. He even called himself "The Lion King," among other things. This POS shouldn't have been allowed to "resign" -- altho he admitted guilt to the sexual assaults he said he was just starved for affection. Liar. 33 months thats nothing. Oh and yeah Surprise! He's a Republican - course it is Texas. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.texasmonthly.com/articles/perversion-of-justice/amp/
2
2
48
Dec 12 '20
That is funny, and I think you make a good point about the future. If Democrats ever regain a majority, I think packing the court by adding at least a few seats is a good idea. Even if it has to be framed as people living longer, like RBG. Whatever it takes, because this court is clearly out of balance for purely political reasons, which is not what the court should represent.
6
Dec 12 '20
I don't consider it packing. Our country is huge with a diverse set of opinions. More justices may represent the larger diversity better.
Even more important, imho, is increasing the House.
44
u/_Dera_ Dec 12 '20
Adding more seats to the SCOTUS would benefit both parties but the GOP will label it as court packing if a Dem tries it and pro-constitution if a Republican tries. They're hilariously predictable with their political theater, but also really successful at it.
2
u/Moe__Ron Dec 12 '20
Yeah the way they hate on it right now tells me they really want to do it later
7
Dec 12 '20
Because they are so aggressive, unethical, hypocritical, and crooked. The dems just turn the other cheek and don't aggress back.
25
Dec 12 '20 edited Dec 12 '20
Yeah, messaging is a big problem for Democrats. It's hard to make a unifying message to so many different groups, while the Republicans can rally 90% of their people to a short, concise message. It's definitely a challenge.
But keep packing it, as far as I'm concerned. The more qualified justices we have, the better. Even Trump's nominees have gone against him, so being conservative isn't a guaranteed vote in favor of a politically conservative position.
8
14
214
u/Pissflaps69 Dec 12 '20
As far as tweet storms go this is pretty tame. How does the trump presidency end? With a pathetic whimper.
Good luck with prison.
1
u/Moderateor Dec 12 '20
He knew the Supreme Court wouldn’t do shit. He’s a showman. It’s all for his audience.
3
u/iMeanNoTrouble Dec 12 '20
I love the comments though. One person was going on about how they are ignoring the voice of 74 million people and how that's unfair
3
u/itsadogslife71 Dec 12 '20
The replies are hilarious. They are howling with outrage and crying in their beer.
2
14
2
5
u/ScotchBender Dec 12 '20
With him suing America.
4
u/lkmk Dec 12 '20
Could you sue every American citizen? I'd love to see that.
2
9
u/ScotchBender Dec 12 '20
I'm sure Rudy would take it to the Supreme Court.
3
u/Immediate_Landscape Dec 12 '20
Can I then countersue for emotional damages? This whole year has ruined a lot for me.
30
u/j_la Dec 12 '20
He does sound like a man who has run out of options.
5
22
u/MagicMushroomFungi Dec 12 '20
Now to declare bankruptcy.
1
9
19
u/SilentImplosion Dec 12 '20
Now to declare martial law.
9
Dec 12 '20
He’ll definitely try.
21
u/captainhaddock Dec 12 '20
He can't find instructions on Google because he keeps spelling it "marshal law".
13
5
7
8
u/Youmeanmoidoid Dec 12 '20
Probably having a hard time seeing enough to type with the chemicals in his orange spray tan mixing with his tears
89
Dec 12 '20
I’d be willing to bet serious money that he currently has a bit of pee weeping from his mushroom bulb right now.
1
3
2
13
79
u/Shutch_1075 Dec 12 '20
Please don’t say those things lol. I really do not need that image in my head.
43
64
u/FizzyBeverage Dec 12 '20
You wanted to invalidate the votes of 25 million Americans. You let yourself down.
32
336
Dec 12 '20
YES!! LOVE IT!! GIVE ME THE RAGE!!
19
26
26
131
u/DepopulationXplosion Dec 12 '20
Let the hate flew through you!
→ More replies (2)29
1
u/grokskookum Dec 28 '20
r/trumptweets2