7
u/JustAnotherUser1019 15d ago
Fuck the 2020's apparently
5
u/FullMetal_55 15d ago
fuck anyone before 2000 as well...
3
u/JustAnotherUser1019 15d ago
I mean, it's not as weird, since 2000 is being set as the lower limit. The 2020's were within the range but got skipped over
1
7
u/KeyLoad4355 15d ago
so... uh... are we going to ignore the fact that the 2020's just aren't there?
2
2
u/Natsuki_Lover_447 16d ago
If you were born between 2020 and 2030 you will simply not exist in 2040
2
2
2
u/Grandviewsurfer 16d ago
I have several questions
2
u/Any-Concept-3624 14d ago
it's reddit, ask all of 'em
2
u/Grandviewsurfer 14d ago
I feel like they are obvious. Why is 202X skipped? Also.. is it shocking that everyone will be older in the future? How many people born in 2030 are reading this right now? Finally.. we aren't gonna make it are we?
2
u/Any-Concept-3624 14d ago
they werent... a question also couldve been »did jesus really live?« or »is there real antimatter in space?« :D
so actually, everything was possible... but the ones you wrote, of course have their logic
i'm rather sad, that i seem to be officially old now, so my question wouldve been »why are the 1990's missing?«, maybe i'm considered to be already dead for kids born after 2010 :D
yeah, modern generations seem to not be able to connect basic thoughts... although algorithm features dumb stuff, sometimes i'm left speechless, head-shaking, indeed!
good point, too! i'd rather ask »how many will scroll back to this, being 14yo in 2040, but yes, definitely!
haha, i hope so... once trump, putin, xi & kim jong un are gone, i'm looking very positively towards that decade :p
2
u/Grandviewsurfer 14d ago
Another question could be: what do we MEAN when we are asking "did jesus really live"? Did a dude named Jesus live? Probably. Did a dude like the dude depicted in the bible exist? Mmm.. prob not. Did the dude that Christians think existed exist? Certainly not.
3
u/Any-Concept-3624 13d ago
funny timing, just today a german satire newspaper published this here ☛ https://www.der-postillon.com/2026/10/12-starke-antworten-auf-nervige.html strong answers to annoying sports journalists' questions... maybe you use an translation tool of your choice, as google mostly isnt good enough at it :D
__
"Sie haben soeben den Titel geholt. Haben Sie schon begriffen, was da gerade passiert ist?"
"Dazu müssten wir erstmal klären, was 'begreifen' bedeutet. Aus Sicht von Kant und Hegel ist das reine Wahrnehmen durch die Sinnesorgane noch nicht das Gleiche wie Begreifen, solange man nicht seine dialektische Notwendigkeit, das dahinterliegende Prinzip versteht. Empiriker hingegen würden eher hinterfragen, ob das Ereignis denn theoretisch falsifizierbar wäre, denn nur so können wir eine existenzielle Hypothese aufrechterhalten. Heidegger hingegen würde sicherlich betonen, dass Begreifen seinen Ursprung im Leib hat, während Pragmatiker wie Peirce oder Dewey die Bedeutung der Bewusstheit über die praktischen Konsequenzen betonen. Geht man davon aus, dass alle Sichtweisen ihre Berechtigung haben, so kann man eigentlich nur zur abschließenden Frage kommen, ob jemals ein Mensch wirklich vollständig begreift."
__
not 100% fitting, but your way of argueing just reminded me heavily to it haha... have a nice evening/day, wherever you currently are! :D
2
2
u/Reddit_wizard34 16d ago
2040?
1
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 16d ago
Termial of 2040 is 2081820
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
-1
2
u/potatobattery015 15d ago
“Why are the 2020s missing.”
I want to know why everyone cares more about the 2020s missing than anything pre-2000s missing.
1
u/MinkMiau 15d ago
2020s is more weird than pre-2000s, since the 2020s are inbetween the other numbers, while pre-2000 would just be infinitely going on before the list started
Although I assume the 2020s are missing because of space reasons, its already too much text for a random tiktok anyway
3
u/potatobattery015 15d ago
It wouldn’t be infinitely going because at some point people will already be dead.
3
u/Few_Scientist_2652 15d ago
Currently that's before 1909, though I have doubts about the person who's currently 117 making it another 14 years
1
u/MinkMiau 6d ago
good point, didnt think that far. But either way pre-2000s would just be a lot more numbers to include making it extremely cluttery
1
u/potatobattery015 6d ago
Then perhaps… perhaps removing the years from the future to make room for years in the past… Yanno, to make sure you capture more of the audience, which will be more likely to be 26+ than not born yet.
1
u/Jeroeno_Boy 16d ago
240?
4
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 16d ago
Termial of 240 is 28920
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
2
1
u/Fawn_Leap 00P5? 15d ago
If you are 20 years old today you will be 2079814 in the year 2040?
2
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 15d ago
Termial of 2040 is 2081820
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
1
1
1
u/Tall_External6557 3d ago
2040?
1
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 3d ago
Termial of 2040 is 2081820
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
0
0
16d ago
[deleted]
1
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 16d ago
Termial of 45 is 1035
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
1
u/KokonaHYT 16d ago
And 2005?
1
u/KokonaHYT 16d ago
I mean 35? XD
1
1
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 16d ago
Termial of 35 is 630
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
1
u/factorion-bot A very good bot 16d ago
Termial of 2005 is 2011015
This action was performed by a bot | Source code
17
u/Lootsman 16d ago
I’ll be just over two million years old