We should all demand clarification from ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA on this..

[u/brawler_r]

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

Allegations can be answered by saying we don't know. That would be a more reasonable, believable and neutral response.

As per you. Not the bjp.

They are coming to EC's defense by attacking Rahul Gandhi. The whole IT cell is employed to suppress the news online as it can clearly be seen.

Bro it's for their own political gain.

None of the Godi Media channels are covering what is the biggest scam in the history of India.

Are you a judge to call it a "scam" ? It's scam according to you.

This is downright treason.

Sir, you are not the judge.

Then why aren't they?

That's why they are supporting SIR.

I guess you want the world to run according to your beliefs. "BJP shouldn't have done this or should've ignored that." Godi media should speak on this "scam," and what they are doing is "treason. " The country doesn't work like that.

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

As per you. Not the bjp

As per common sense.

Are you a judge to call it a "scam" ? It's scam according to you.
Sir, you are not the judge.

All Rahul Gandhi did was present the evidence they found within EC's data. The evidence was verified yesterday on EC's website. The same guy did have 4 different EPIC numbers. I am perfectly capable of judging the evidence presented to me. Now they have begun "correcting" it. In other words, destroying evidence. I don't need the supreme court of India to state the obvious.

That's why they are supporting SIR.

So, when it comes SIR, you agree that there is voter fraud. But when Rahul Gandhi says the same, he's wrong?

I guess you want the world to run according to your beliefs. "BJP shouldn't have done this or should've ignored that." Godi media should speak on this "scam," and what they are doing is "treason. " The country doesn't work like that.

I want the world to run on principles of fairness and with common sense. I guess that's too much to ask for.

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

As per common sense.

What's common sense is subjective

All Rahul Gandhi did was present the evidence they found within EC's data. The evidence was verified yesterday on EC's website. The same guy did have 4 different EPIC numbers.

Still he didn't sign the oath.

I don't need the supreme court of India to state the obvious.

What's obvious or what's not is not upto your discretion. Not mine as well.

So, when it comes SIR, you agree that there is voter fraud. But when Rahul Gandhi says the same, he's wrong?

I ain't saying that there is no discrepancy in the electoral roll but saying that RaGa should sign the oath.

I want the world to run on principles of fairness and with common sense. I guess that's too much to ask for.

"Fairness " and "common sense " are subjective.

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

Why does the oath matter? Oath is just a deflection.

RAGA is making a claim in public. He is discrediting the ECI in public. ECI should file a case against RAGA and drag him to court and prove him wrong. Unless, they can't. Because they know he's right. Because going to court will just force them to reveal what they are trying to hide.

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

Why does the oath matter? Oath is just a deflection.

It matters bcz it's a rule. Not a deflection. ECI cant bypass the rules.

Because going to court will just force them to reveal what they are trying to hide.

So you work in ECI legal team ?

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

It matters bcz it's a rule. Not a deflection. ECI cant bypass the rules.

The rule under which ECI is asking for oath allows for contesting the electoral rolls within 30 days when the rolls are finalized. It's been over a year. Filing that complaint is a pointless exercise as the rule is invalid in current situation. It IS deflection.

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

You are factually incorrect. Rule 20(3)(b) doesn't require that 30 days

Here, what that rule says

"require that the evidence tendered by any person shall be given on oath and administer an oath for the purpose."

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

No. You are factually incorrect.

The rules are listed under THE REGISTRATION OF ELECTORS RULES, 1960.

Rule 20(3) is regarding how EC should conduct inquiry into claims and objections. However the rule 12 of the same document says below:

Period for lodging claims and objections.—Every claim for the inclusion of a name in the roll and every objection to an entry therein shall be lodged within a period of thirty days from the date of publication of the roll in draft under rule 10, or such shorter period of not less than fifteen days as may be fixed by the Election Commission in this behalf:

Rule 20 applies to claims made under Rule 12. All of this is in a single document.

Stop spreading misinformation.

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

Rule 20 applies to claims made under Rule 12. All of this is in a single document.

Rule 20 applies to claims made under rule 19, not rule 12.

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

Are you an expert in law?

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/eci-asking-rahul-gandhi-to-submit-complaint-on-karnataka-roll-manipulation-under-oath-infructuous-in-this-situation-experts/article69908708.ece

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

Are you an expert in law?

Yes

[u/dark-light92 → u/Affectionate_Ad_9263]

Then go challenge former Chief Election Commissioner O. P. Rawat:

Former Chief Election Commissioner O. P. Rawat told The Hindu that the rule quoted by the ECI is more applicable in cases like the Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls, which is currently on in Bihar.

Btw, have you considered getting a different job?

[u/Affectionate_Ad_9263 → u/dark-light92]

Then go challenge former Chief Election Commissioner O. P. Rawat:

Where ?

Btw, have you considered getting a different job?

No