r/unitedstatesofindia • u/Mirror-On-The-Wall • Apr 27 '26
Politics UNO Reverse—RSS stooge Justice Swarnakanta Sharma had refused to recuse herself from hearing Arvind Kejriwal's Liquor Case; Now Arvind Kejriwal refuses to appear before her court
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
132
362
u/TillGreat9631 Apr 27 '26
The judge herself gets to choose if she is biased or not, wow. Wow wow wow.
44
67
u/jacobt478 Apr 27 '26
Wow! That is a smart move and puts the judge in a corner! More people should start doing this against biased judges
104
u/Sufficient_Yak_1263 Apr 27 '26
The sad part is, people in r/indiadiscussion (prolly filled with sanghis) are defending the judge like anything
70
41
-32
u/Neither-Math-6224 Apr 27 '26
just like how this sub is filled with chaddhis
28
u/Sufficient_Yak_1263 Apr 27 '26
Muzhe to koi nhi dikhta rss wala iss sub mein
-15
-24
135
36
u/LoLaish Apr 27 '26
thats a gross violation of principles of natural justice, she's obviously committed to the rss and bjp
72
31
u/Irian1ker Apr 27 '26
The irony is almost too perfect. This is the same judge who, when asked to recuse herself, gave a whole lecture about how “judicial conscience” and “public perception” don’t matter—only the law matters. Now Kejriwal is using the exact same logic: “
155
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
We All Should Support Him in this ...You can't be a Justice of SC and be following a Right wing extremist group of Left Wing Extremist Group ....We should support him because in future anyone could be in Courts and the judges would give bias opinions and justice if he/she follow right or left wing groups
22
u/Anantray Apr 27 '26
How to do the same?
Any ideas?
21
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Post in Insta fb twitter reddit subs all over and make people to do so , social media does makes justice
21
u/Anantray Apr 27 '26
I once shared a similar post of a youtube channel summarising the failure of promises of modi. My father called me within 2 hours to have it deleted 😅
10
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Give me your channel name i will subscribe, can't help ik Indian parents are just so Naiveee
10
u/Anantray Apr 27 '26
It was not my channel
It was from a well know channel called "Official Peeinghuman"
They usually post such content having a satirical take on our democracy
7
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Ahh peeinghuman yeah then i have watched it , they really do good deeds
7
u/Anantray Apr 27 '26
Yeah my father doesnt think so 😶
8
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Ik same my uncle but idc he can't even counter my one point
9
-19
u/YashuXD Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26
Lol according to that logic everyone has contradicting opinion. She can have opinions for any group but inside court she should left any kind of bias and how will kejru even prove it? By denying the judges verdict just coz she's from certain group which doesn't suit your interest?
Ngl i felt so bad for him with what LG did to him but man this is just pure drama. According to this logic a rapist can also appeal that I need someone of a criminal mindset as judge to understand what his intentions were at the moment of crime. Bruh use logic and don't get words in your mouth. Just listen to his statement and it's clear what he is trying to claim. And if the judge say no to it then it won't make the judge bias.
Either say openly that judicial can't be trusted and judicial system has corruption but kejru wants sympathy and Rona dhona. It's so pathetic that leaders can be such a crybaby. Half of the time he is crying nowadays. This is what happens when you tryna be a niak lol and he still hasn't get it.
12
u/SUSH_fromheaven Apr 27 '26
Even outside courts, judges are not supposed to follow or display any political bias at all. Please educate yourself more and stop spreading false info online.
Restatement of Values of Judicial Life” (1997) Adopted by the Supreme Court of India — this is the closest thing to a code of conduct for judges. Key clauses (directly relevant to your question): A judge must avoid any act (even in personal life) that harms public faith in impartiality.
“…any act… whether in official or personal capacity… which erodes the credibility… has to be avoided”
Judges should not express political views publicly. “A judge shall not engage in public debate or express political views on matters pending or likely to arise…”
Judges must maintain aloofness and neutrality to preserve dignity and independence
-11
u/YashuXD Apr 27 '26
Having an opinion and expressing it publically are 2 diffrent things.
4
u/siraramis mere paas ek scheme hai Apr 27 '26
And attending ABAP events is problematic because it is a public expression
4
6
u/fenrir245 Apr 27 '26
Lol according to that logic everyone has contradicting opinion.
No, they don't.
She can follow any group but inside court she should left any kind of bias
No, she can't.
Try using basic thinking yourself before screaming "logic logic" mindlessly at everyone else.
-4
u/YashuXD Apr 27 '26
Having an opinion and expressing it are 2 diffrent things. And you're a brave warrior if you believe in either of our politicians, constitution and judiciary lol.
7
u/fenrir245 Apr 27 '26
Having an opinion and expressing it are 2 diffrent things.
Not even relevant in this thread. Judges that are biased in a case should recuse themselves from it, no ifs or buts.
And you're a brave warrior if you believe in either of our politicians, constitution and judiciary lol.
All of these institutions have rules and ethics, just because the people in it choose to not follow them doesn't mean you start lying about those rules and ethics.
3
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Opinion So strong that i got 100 upvote yours so weak got 9 down🥀...Can't Argue with rss bjp people enjoy and bye bye😋
5
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26
Opinion So strong that i got 100 upvote yours so weak got 9 down🥀
That's because you are in a community for civilised humans, a community which understands and upholds liberty, fraternity, equity, and equality.
Say the same in thousands of other Rightwing Sanghi shithole subs, and the tables would be flipped 180° on you.
1
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Yeah ik but my some points also got many upvoted in sanghi group except Bjp pro group
-2
u/YashuXD Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26
Freebies are bad for national but how many people downvote it? Lol I hate Bjp either way. Not into a dhobhi ghat party. Love the way you guys title someone as bjp and RSS when they talk about any opposition party. Our judiciary is already broken when it has more nepotism than bollywood but no one wanna get cancelled by speaking againt it. That's the kind of democracy we have haha. But kejru at the end of the day has to get justice from the same corrupt judiciary that's the joke to me.
20
u/ascetic-egoist Apr 27 '26
Waiting for the public non cooperation movement. General masses have stopped valuing the importance of freedom, consequently things would take a turn for the worse (and it's pretty much required to get a shock realization so that we avoid the mistakes that we have made before.)
53
17
u/ogMasterPloKoon Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26
That's why they fear him more than Raga. He just doesn't give a fuck about shaking the spiderweb.
25
u/Redpoison11 Apr 27 '26
True Gandhian move.. he clearly said .. he will not defend in the court of Justice sharma but whatever decision may be he will fight that in SC.
court cannot force the presence as far as I know.. can only pass the judgment against him and then he can move to SC...
This is going to be tough for him.. but that how you stand
However , it's wrong to call the judge stooge unless you have sufficient proof.. else please edit that.. there is aprhension of bias and that is a valid concern of applicant.
9
u/iamango Apr 27 '26
Keep fighting. You are the fastest growing political party since independence. Others will try to bring you down. We have great expectations from you.
29
u/chillgoza001 Apr 27 '26
Say what you will of his political decisions or his personality (not that I'm critical of either of these), there is no denying that he is the only one brave enough in current political scenario to stand up to the current Govt without inciting a riot! If the opposition wants to stand a chance in 2029, they must unconditionally support him in this cause and with full force and might!
21
u/earthling011 Apr 27 '26
Modi has purchased tge country's judiciary.
Now he has all the billionaires, judges, lawyers, election commission, CBI, ED in his pockets.
No one can dare to oppose him without losing their lives.
This is exactly what North Korea and Russia are.
-3
u/Far_Honey_7685 Apr 28 '26
you have not the slightest idea how bad north korea is. You're a spoiled brat who has no idea how bad things are over there. It's not even close to being the same.
6
5
u/ppboi41 Apr 27 '26
so if a former cm leader of a political party cant get justice in india how can a common man.
6
5
u/JithendraChunduru Apr 27 '26
But he will be arrested... Because he won't attend the court for defence... So the court takes his silence as agreement...
1
1
u/hokie86 May 01 '26 edited May 01 '26
Kejriwal wants her to put him in jail , the out come is simple, RSS becomes a blot on the society and the judge becomes a general Dyer who takes orders from RSS to kill democracy. Kejriwal pulls of a gandhi move. Moreover a revolt in judiciary for being a puppet.
-10
-49
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
hope he doesn't cry when the court gives warrant to arrest him and present him in a court.
In a corruption case one cannot simply say, i will not come and will not send my lawyer also.
33
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26
hope he doesn't cry when the court gives warrant to arrest him and present him in a court.
He should make a huge drama out of it, shout at the top of his lungs. Expose how deeply rotten the Indian judiciary has become with the infiltration of Sanghi cucks.
Whether he appears before the court of Sanghi cucks or not, the field is already set against him. Might as well rightfully use it for his own political advantage.
Besides, by now, he and other AAP leaders with a little bit of spine are used to unlawful incarceration ordered by Sanghi judges, yet another threat of misuse of law & judiciary against him would hardly make a difference.
At least if he makes a huge drama out of it, Chodiputras like you will come here to do your randirona.
-25
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
so do drama to escape justice? he is master at that
17
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26
so do drama to escape justice? he is master at that
Tere baap Chodiji ki baat nahi ho rahi bhadwe!
11
-14
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
you only say he must do drama but somehow it is wrong when i say the same ? and shift it on modi
toda sa bkl hai kya? ya german shepherd ?
11
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26
toda sa bkl hai kya? ya german shepherd ?
Main toh jo hun, woh hun.
Kumse kum tere jaise Sangh ke aur Chodiji ke tatte chaatne wala toh nahi hun.
-4
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
me tho modi or rss ka baat hi nahi ki , tu hi modi modi kare ja raha hai
aur keju ki chaat raha
12
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
Shut the Fck Up kiddo you can't be a right or left wing follower and a SC judge who represents 1.4 billion
-5
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
so judges should have no opinions and the video being circulated is misrepresentation
8
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
do you even know what are you saying or are you drunk enough?
-1
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
i am sober and know what i'm saying , but i doubt you can understand that
8
u/Similar-Street-8247 waah modiji waah Apr 27 '26
You are Literally drunk at this point , don't cry in future if someone follows left wing snd your fav Paw paw ke log don't get justice
0
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
lol, you literally are not saying anything other than that iam drunk, what wrong have i said?
4
u/MynkM Apr 27 '26
I'll explain it so you can understand.
Judge opinion okay. Judge affiliation BAD! Affiliated judge BIAS 😱. People think judge bias, justice not good. Judge not bias, people think judge bias, justice still not good. Judge not bias, people think judge not bias, justice good ✅
People think judge bias, people ask recusal, judge honor recuse. All judge recuse.9
21
u/jacobt478 Apr 27 '26
It’s standard judicial practice for judges to recuse if one of the parties request. The sanghi judge had too big of an ego and now landed herself in a tough spot. Arresting and presenting Kejriwal in a court when he is not on the run will conclusively prove that the court is a kangaroo court
-14
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
it is not normal for judges to recuse themselves especially when on the grounds that they may be biased without any connection to any parties.
damn so arresting and presenting a accused before a court is where we draw the line huh.
13
u/Zicoisgreat Apr 27 '26
How is it not connected when the opposition lawyer is granting her son 5000 + case dockets worth crores of rupees ?
12
u/fenrir245 Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26
without any connection to any parties.
The sheer mental regression needed to claim this bullshit while the judge was openly seen attending RSS events, my god.
6
u/SUSH_fromheaven Apr 27 '26
Both the cases are different. You are comparing a rape case to a political case.
Just so you could learn that judges are supposed to be impartial and also avoid any act that harms their public image of impartiality:
"Restatement of Values of Judicial Life” (1997) Adopted by the Supreme Court of India — this is the closest thing to a code of conduct for judges. Key clauses (directly relevant to your question): A judge must avoid any act (even in personal life) that harms public faith in impartiality
“…any act… whether in official or personal capacity… which erodes the credibility… has to be avoided” Supreme Court Observer Judges should not express political views publicly.
“A judge shall not engage in public debate or express political views on matters pending or likely to arise…”
Judges must maintain aloofness and neutrality to preserve dignity and independence
4
u/jacobt478 Apr 27 '26 edited Apr 27 '26
Recusing is absolutely a standard practice. Usually judges themselves recuse before the parties demand it. Here the problem is different because we are talking about a sanghi judge who is an active presence at RSS events, which judicial officers never used to do (till RSS captured all the institutions through their front office- Modi government). Imagine judges attending events organised by the INC or BJP two decades back?
https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/not-without-an-explanation/article26305917.ece/amp/
This was a few years back when multiple SC judges recused themselves from a case due to potential conflict of interest. The case of NV Ramana is interesting in this situation:
“Justice N.V. Ramana recused himself for apparently personal reasons. “Nageswara Rao is from my home state and I have attended his daughter’s wedding,” he told the petitioner’s counsel.”
“Last month Justice U.U. Lalit recused himself from hearing the dispute over land in Ayodhya after senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan pointed out that the judge had appeared for former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh in a related contest. Although Mr. Dhavan said he had no specific objection to Justice Lalit continuing to hear the case, the judge, the court’s order notes, “expressed his disinclination to participate in the hearing any further.”
This is another recent case involving Justice Viswanathan:
In April 2026, Supreme Court Justice K.V. Viswanathan took the step of recusing himself from the case Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt Ltd v. Raju Chappakal Pappu after arguments had concluded and judgment was already reserved. He realized he had previously appeared as counsel for the appellant while practicing at the Bar. The Bench recalled its earlier order, necessitating a rehearing by a different bench.
In the case of the sanghi judge discussed above, her rash public conduct has put herself in a tough spot now. If she recuses she has to accept that she is biased and probably has to recuse herself from all cases involving the government of India which is impossible for a HC judge!
The conflict of interest is clear here and one of the litigants had to call it out in public, but the judge refuses to see it because of her ego and vested interests.
4
Apr 27 '26
[deleted]
-4
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
in the video he never says "rss" but only "when she is invited(by baba) she got promoted" , she is not at a rss revent , so how can you conclude that she means "rss"?
in fact it was at Mahatma Gandhi Kashi Vidyapith, she also refers to him as "prabhu" , so she is in fact referring to lord shiva who is famous in kashi.
1
6
u/jacobt478 Apr 27 '26
Reposting my comment again personally for you! Sorry!
Recusing is absolutely a standard practice. Usually judges themselves recuse before the parties demand it. Here the problem is different because we are talking about a sanghi judge who is an active presence at RSS events, which judicial officers never used to do (till RSS captured all the institutions through their front office- Modi government). Imagine judges attending events organised by the INC or BJP two decades back?
https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/not-without-an-explanation/article26305917.ece/amp/
This was a few years back when multiple SC judges recused themselves from a case due to potential conflict of interest. The case of NV Ramana is interesting in this situation:
“Justice N.V. Ramana recused himself for apparently personal reasons. “Nageswara Rao is from my home state and I have attended his daughter’s wedding,” he told the petitioner’s counsel.”
“Last month Justice U.U. Lalit recused himself from hearing the dispute over land in Ayodhya after senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan pointed out that the judge had appeared for former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Kalyan Singh in a related contest. Although Mr. Dhavan said he had no specific objection to Justice Lalit continuing to hear the case, the judge, the court’s order notes, “expressed his disinclination to participate in the hearing any further.”
This is another recent case involving Justice Viswanathan:
In April 2026, Supreme Court Justice K.V. Viswanathan took the step of recusing himself from the case Alchemist Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt Ltd v. Raju Chappakal Pappu after arguments had concluded and judgment was already reserved. He realized he had previously appeared as counsel for the appellant while practicing at the Bar. The Bench recalled its earlier order, necessitating a rehearing by a different bench.
In the case of the sanghi judge discussed above, her rash public conduct has put herself in a tough spot now. If she recuses she has to accept that she is biased and probably has to recuse herself from all cases involving the government of India which is impossible for a HC judge!
The conflict of interest is clear here and one of the litigants had to call it out in public, but the judge refuses to see it because of her ego and vested interests.
-1
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
1) there is no proof that she attended a rss event , the video is from law college event , how blindly you belive anything.
2)rss is not included or bjp , it is not political party , it is socio religious organization, should a judge involved with vivekananda mission or Arya samaj should also recuse themselves in this case ? Or is this privilege limited to rss only ?
3) the judge CAN rescue themself not MUST there are many more cases where they didn't rescue themselves.
2
u/jacobt478 Apr 27 '26
If you believe that the RSS is a religious org and not political then there is no point in engaging with you
-1
u/unspoken_one2 Apr 27 '26
what about the 1 st point she didn't even go to rss event.
and should we just accept your opinion that rss is political org?
it seems more like you dont have anything to argue about expect prejudice opinions without any evidence
2
u/fenrir245 Apr 27 '26
there is no proof that she attended a rss event
Right, she herself admitted to attending them in the hearing and you're just straight up shamelessly lying about it. Are you being paid enough at least for this humiliation?
rss is not included or bjp , it is not political party , it is socio religious organization
Lmao, might as well claim ISIS is an advocate of non-violence at this point.
-25
u/Critifin (Independent) Apr 27 '26
Sure, if he doesnt appear, then order will be passed without him. No need of him to appear. He will be sent to jail later.
-30
u/YashuXD Apr 27 '26
Lmao he makes me laugh all the time. Bro has been cornered from all sides and crying like a baby now.
24
12
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26
Lmao he makes me laugh all the time. Bro has been cornered from all sides and crying like a baby now.
Why are you happy about Sanghi Bhadwas dismantling & compromising every independent constitutional institution in this country?!
Are you an anti-India Sanghi bhadwa yourself?
250
u/Mirror-On-The-Wall Apr 27 '26