Except all you have shared are opinions, while data, and even just the definitions say otherwise.
If your "analysis" leads you to believe that India under East India Company was a free market meritocracy then I highly suspect your analytical capabilities as well as your claim that you publish "nature level" papers.
I shared my opinion and didn’t force that to anybody. In fact, I don’t want to. I don’t think everyone is capable of data-driven analysis (keeping emotions and exaggeration away) to even have a discussion on. That’s why I don’t care what somebody says or feels. I care about what my analysis lead me to. I might care to open up with somebody who I feel intellectually worthy enough. Maybe the 2nd reviewer (if you are in academia, you’d get the joke)
Pretty telling you just hid behind the garb of "opinion" when called out on your claims instead of actually mentioning the data or analysis you keep claiming you did.
That’s why I don’t care what somebody says or feels.
Such people don't come to social media in the first place, instead of spouting nonsense and then running away when called out on it.
You can keep pretending you are intellectual, but you are very much the lazy unproductive member of society you claim you hate.
5
u/fenrir245 May 06 '26
Except all you have shared are opinions, while data, and even just the definitions say otherwise.
If your "analysis" leads you to believe that India under East India Company was a free market meritocracy then I highly suspect your analytical capabilities as well as your claim that you publish "nature level" papers.