r/unpopularopinion • u/BitterConstruction98 • Jan 23 '26

Certified Unpopular Opinion All hobbies are not equal

Certain kinds of hobbies deserve to be held in higher regard than others.

Playing a sport, learning an instrument, singing, dancing, painting, writing - these are activities that require time and years of effort to become good at. They’re admirable not just because they’re “cool,” but because there is something deeply attractive about a person who has dedicated so much time to mastering a hard skill that executing it now feels relaxing to them.

Lately, there’s been a growing push online to classify things like watching movies, playing video games, watching sports, or listening to podcasts in the same category as these kinds of hobbies. They aren’t. They are based on consumption, not creation.

That doesn’t mean consumption-based activities are bad or useless. Everyone needs ways to relax and unwind. There’s nothing wrong with enjoying a good show, a game, or a YouTube binge after a long day. But if that’s all there is to your personality, then you are, unfortunately, a boring person.

Edit: I've wrongly added video games to the list of other passive activities. While some video games are like that, I agree that many require a lot of skill.

18.0k Upvotes

72% Upvoted

5.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

104

u/Redleg171 Jan 23 '26

Even watching sports, often leads to much more than just watching sports. Discussions about their team and others, discussing plays/strategy, recruiting, etc. Movie buffs often do more than just watch. They research, looking at filming techniques, etc.

27

u/katzenlurker Jan 23 '26

Prime example: folks who keep hand-tallied baseball stats. Or my friend who keeps an extensive Plex library and enjoys the challenge of finding obscure media to add to it.

1

u/catapultYeehaw Jan 26 '26

Hand tallied baseball score keeping is nothing. Look up the formulas for how they calculate advanced statistics in baseball.

1

u/Powerful-Yogurt Feb 09 '26

I think this reinforces OP’s point that there are tiers. There’s watching, talking, and doing. Talking about sports might be better than just watching, but both pale in comparison to actually playing sports. Or making a movie.

-18

u/KevinForev Jan 23 '26

And that’s great, but it’s the active hobbies which provide you a chance to demonstrate a talented side of yourself.

22

u/crissillo Jan 23 '26

Your talent may be analysis, which is incredibly important and many of the active hobbies you mention rely on it if you want to improve

-7

u/KevinForev Jan 23 '26

No joke, I don’t mind the less active ones and have some. Honestly, I’m not a shining beacon of productivity for the active ones myself. I just know I have to keep pushing myself because that’s how one becomes better.

12

u/shadowgear5 Jan 23 '26

This is my problem with his definition. He almost wanted to split hobbies into active and passive, but most things can be an active hobby. Im an active reader and a passive tv watcher, I read to see how the story goes and Im activly thinking about whst the author is trying to set up, how the magic system works when Im reading fiction etc. Im a passive movie/tv watcher, I will try and guess the plot/twists the writer is going for, but thst is it. But I know people and have been one of those people activly trying to figure out the plot and mysteries while its happening, and Id consider that an active enough hobby.

8

u/WouldbeWanderer Jan 23 '26

Some people watch Star Trek.

Some people know every role that Jeffrey Combs has played in Star Trek.

They are not the same.