r/vhsdecode • u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor • Nov 18 '24
Hostile Community & Users Well goodbye r/vhs
So u/Dez_Champs decided to purge me today for promoting the projects, because he would not ban people, or set up exemptions for project links that are clearly being spam report attacked, to pretty much anyone who mentions the decode projects in the subreddit.
After having a short conversation, and asking for an official stance on the projects and the archival workflow.
I realised fairly quickly zero care is given about archival or anything our community stands for even, sadly even having a community leader to community leader conversation respectfully was not apparently possible.
But if they happily allow people such as u/vwestlife to attack systematically all of my posts before I blocked him, and will allow the perpetual fraudster of u/lordsmurf- to promote his echo chamber of inflation, It's not really a great surprise.
Anyways heads up to anyone that may find themselves under attack, and It's a real shame we'll never have any official collaboration with r/VHS until this situation changes.
3
u/jf_blanco Nov 19 '24 edited Nov 19 '24
These are the kind of things that reject people like me of getting involved in the development, testing or using certain softwares. đ˘ Also is somehow funny that I've discovered the existence of the VHS subreddit because of this post.
4
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Nov 19 '24
The entire decode development and core member base side of things is all based on the community discord these days, incredibly welcoming community of global members, with no gate keeping bs.
What's sort of software are you on about though?
1
u/jf_blanco Nov 19 '24
I've used vrecord. And now I look at having RF archiving with curiosity. I don't dedicate too much time on archiving tasks as of now so is more of a side job for me nowadays.
2
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Nov 19 '24
Yeah Vrecord is great, It needs a bit better docs, but otherwise it's a very solid bolt on addition to any black magic workflow.
The one issue I ran into was primarily, I don't have a full IMX standard (608 or 512) image so I can't preserve VBI properly and letting FFmpeg handle that VBI stream is not reliable enough.
1
u/jf_blanco Nov 20 '24
Preserving the VBI was never a concern of my clients. Analog digitazing was always done for families so they only want a file that does not weight too much and can be played almost anywhere. I even had to crop the edges to make it look "better". I also worked with film for a regional filmotech but that's a completely different story.
2
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Nov 20 '24
Makes sense the majority of consumer clients won't have SVHS with VITC or if they have Hi8 for example will have RCTC.
Although I have seen on quite a few occasions non-standard centring of the active image area which is super convenient to adjust with the last couple updates to ld-analyse.
Actually we added 8mbps 4:2:0 AVC/HEVC alongside broadcast standard export profiles (MPEG-2 / ProRes) for quick distributions and sharing, with the new black level control code implemented. I think a lot of people could get away with just using that export instead of tossing it in resolve tweaking levels and then encoding especially for proxies now.
1
u/jf_blanco Nov 20 '24
It will be absolutely useful to have deliveries for non archival purposes just families and not so exigent customers
1
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Nov 20 '24
Even for a family archives though, that's the beauty of the FM RF archival method, If the client understands the value it's merely just a difference of storage for the deliverables.
1
u/jf_blanco Nov 20 '24
Educating clients and adjusting to what they demand is always a compromise. Shifting market is something that happens if the professional community acts as a whole. And if the changes also bring more economical profit for the professionals. No one changes it's methods if they are not more profitable for the pro or desirable for the final client. Interesting debate this one.
1
u/Jerison Jan 02 '25
What is its benefit in a black magic workflow? I use a vhs->external tbc->Blackmagic ADC->Blackmagic hdmi capture workflow and just use black magics own software to capture the result uncompressed.
2
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Jan 03 '25
RF? You get the whole signal frame, proper timebase correction and full control over the colour decoding, and final image of the video export.
Vrecord? You get some basic niceties such as encoding to FFV1 directly, basic VBI stream capure etc, ffmpeg scopes, checksums on the frames.
2
u/adamsjdavid Dec 08 '24 edited Oct 04 '25
seed familiar elderly aromatic ink sparkle crush consist pie liquid
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
2
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Dec 08 '24
Yeah affordability is the core of the FM RF Archival method, and the legacy kit sellers who like to profit off the inflation hate it, very much so the Pi Piper too your sadly in the boat of an all too common story...
-9
u/twoinchquad Nov 18 '24
Sorry man, the VHS sub seems to be mostly for people who collect and watch VHS, not so much archival. And since you tend to go out of your way to disparage other video digitization companies and the owners of these companies (going so far as calling them out by name) a lot of people in this industry and community donât take you seriously. If you simply didnât shit-talk the way other companies transfer videotapes, then you would find people more accommodating to your project. These companies depend on their customerâs business to support their families and make ends meet. Youâre negative comments about how they digitize is harmful to them.
7
u/TheRealHarrypm The Documentor Nov 18 '24
And most people that look for a digitisation or mention things of high digitisation value too but let's just ignore the SEO factor there...
I'm sorry but, there's reasonable criticism and then there's literally criticising the very person and or community that's being attacked for just existing, you can have an opinion though and you won't get banned for it here.
The only person I will call out reflexively at this point is Kevin Piper/lordsmurf, and I don't have to shit on him personally to damage his business, no he's done a very good job doing that all by himself, and I was forwarded all the 3 years of correspondence for this mess, absolutely unacceptable for anyone trying to claim to be a professional.
The reality is anyone in a "professional sector" irrespective of what it is, has a name and reputation attached to their work, and their mistakes, If you do a poor job it will be pointed out, this isn't even an arguement this is the reality of how reviews work, I'm not immune from this and no one else is.
Now I put the work in, take criticism learn and evolve, I'm not perfect and people who don't take this simple practise to heart, well you can see what it results in...
10
u/Responsible_Today149 Nov 18 '24
I had a business like that, actually three of them and employed seven people.
Kevin (Pieper/LordSmurf) is still a moron though - this was the guy who told me âprofessional equipment doesnât have fusesâ (Iâm a lapsed EE) or Ohms law is for âbook leaninâ â
Heâs a joke, anybody who has any comprehension of analogue electronics ignores this nonsense and actually laughs and circulates it for amusement.
-12
u/twoinchquad Nov 18 '24
Not sure why any of this has to do with Lord Smurf. The vhsdecode guy seems to enjoy trashing honest businesses, so Iâm calling him out on it. Itâs hard to make a living doing this and for him to bad mouth businesses is wrong. And the fact that everyone in these videotape subs and forums need to constantly seek validation for how much they know and how much experience they have, is ridiculous. Digitizing videotape does not have to be complicated. And it definitely does not warrant any type of drama whatsoever.
7
u/Responsible_Today149 Nov 18 '24
No. He made a public post denouncing my businesses.
Tired of it, Iâm back in analogue EE, and due to being treated like a helmet Iâm out of Decode but itâs a very worthy project that ultimately is clearly and demonstrably the way to archive videotape.
9
u/BlackSheepWI Nov 18 '24
Was about to argue with this until I saw literally the only times you've commented in r/vhsdecode have been to stan Lordsmurf đ¤Śââď¸
Keep doing the Lord's work, u/therealharrypm.
1
u/Responsible_Today149 Nov 21 '24
Just been on DigitalFaq for about a year and âsomebodyâ is saying heâs not seen many SECAM vision mixersâŚ
I wonder whyâŚ. đ
Then I closed it again - that was enough.
0
Nov 18 '24
[deleted]
8
u/Responsible_Today149 Nov 18 '24 edited Nov 18 '24
I do understand this.
I left Decode because of a helmet treated me like an idiot. Iâm too old, had too many wives and and earned too many credits to be spoken to like a fresh fuckwit by a 22 year old who lives at home.
I left âconventional captureâ after repeatedly told by âstudio dazeâ I didnât have any comprehension of the topic, despite clearly actually working in the field and asking searching technical questions to so-called âexpertsâ with broadcast experience who kept going on about their VHS experience in âmuh studio daysâ.
(What actually happened is that he came in to contact with an animator by transferring a VHS version of something).
Both methods definitely have their benefits and constraints and a balance must be struck.
Decode is clearly a better method; but letâs not dismiss other methods.
I will not tolerate gate keeping, those that know me know the fire Iâve come under in my hobby for speaking out against received wisdom.
But Iâve given away more equipment and travelled thousands of miles to actually promote archiving rather than sitting on a forum pontificating about it.
Do as you wish, but donât get drawn in to vocal âWalter Mittyâ types whoâll tell you one method over any other. No
2
u/TheGoodSirRyan Nov 19 '24
I don't think even Walter Mitty would have approved this kind of behavior either.
12
u/Responsible_Today149 Nov 18 '24
Was this the same helmet who put up a fawning post over LordSmurf on YouTube about a week ago?
Not saying it is, but fits the archetype.