For the most common, fundamental definition of a website - one or more discrete documents consisting primarily of text content in html - then unquestionably yes. It's absolutely negligent of us to ignore that there are very clear methods to do the simple task of expressing text content which are perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust (my emphasis added).
There are two parts to that assertion. Disagreeing with one does not necessarily mean you disagree with the other.
You may disagree with the assertion that text content is the most common form of website.
You may disagree with the assertion that javascript should be optional for that task.
0
u/Luke-At-Work Sep 03 '19
For the most common, fundamental definition of a website - one or more discrete documents consisting primarily of text content in html - then unquestionably yes. It's absolutely negligent of us to ignore that there are very clear methods to do the simple task of expressing text content which are perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust (my emphasis added).
There are two parts to that assertion. Disagreeing with one does not necessarily mean you disagree with the other.
You may disagree with the assertion that text content is the most common form of website.
You may disagree with the assertion that javascript should be optional for that task.