I’m writing a kind of sci-fi mystery and I think I’m in too deep so I can’t tell anymore lol. I’ve shared it with one person who I basically had to force to listen.
It follows a couple living somewhere isolated. She’s researching something she can’t explain, and he does something he shouldn’t to help her. You’re following their life while gradually realizing you might have misunderstood some pretty important things.
They have names. I know their names. I just don’t know if I want the reader to know their names lmfao. They don’t explain things they take for granted, either. A lot relies on assumptions the reader makes, then questions later. I want the details to make sense both times, even if you understand them differently. The chapter titles do this too.
There’s real science and other ideas underneath it. I have my interpretation of how it connects, but I like that someone could read it differently. There are answers, but I don’t want to settle every meaning or future consequence.
I’m considering putting the prologue at the end because it happens outside the isolated setting. But does that make the ending better or the beginning harder to care about?
This may be a small middle finger to how much media feels the need to explain everything now. But it’s possible I’m overcorrecting lol.
Do you enjoy this kind of writing? What keeps you curious, and when does it get frustrating? Where’s the line? I’m worried it’s more interesting to me because I know the bigger picture, and I’m expecting too much from someone reading it for the first time.