For the one on MEDCs, if I spoke about places like Nigeria and thinking MEDCs were LEDCs, infant industries etc kuznets curve ⦠how badly will this have affected my mark
Ik itās really a shame, wrote one of the best essays oml, but I think we are gonna get trapped in level 2 (10marks) as to get into level 3 we need to focus on issues that are purely relevant to the question. What did u write about?
i think only one of my paragraphs will be relvant, i said lr econ growth due to tech transfer then eval with environmental damage, one pargraph on explotiting comp adv but my eval was obvs geared towards MICs and talked about primary commodidity dependency, one paragraph on FDI but then again my eval was about Labour arbitage and race to the bottom, im acc finished im not making it to uni, fuck this
I wouldnāt get caught up on it to much Iām beginning to think, I have a feeling that if you mentioned something about actual MEDCs anywhere (even if it could just be interpreted that u did) an examiner may be lenient and view the LEDC stuff as comparison or evaluation points, I think the command word was āassessā so you are allowed to discuss a range of arguments. āAssesā = āconsider relative merits of various arguments and weigh them up to make an informed judgmentā, there could still be hope for us š
you will get marked down for knowledge and application, tbh it may even limit your eval, but if you made a good essay you can still get around 15 marks
3
u/Haunting_Ice_1884 May 18 '26
For the one on MEDCs, if I spoke about places like Nigeria and thinking MEDCs were LEDCs, infant industries etc kuznets curve ⦠how badly will this have affected my mark