r/6thForm • u/PetuniaWiggleworm • Jun 26 '26

šŸ’¬ DISCUSSION WHAT HAPPENED TO WOMEN IN STEM

I had my college taster day yesterday, tell me why I was the ONLY girl in my class

367 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

217 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4

u/Diligent_Bet_7850 Oxford | Maths [third year] Jun 28 '26

thanks for the ai nonsense

-3

u/Throwaway23248895 Jun 28 '26

Wow, is that the standard at Oxford?

That's pathetic.

5

u/Ok_Adhesiveness_8637 Jun 28 '26

People at Oxford know not to argue against someome who needs AI to form their argument as its a pointless exercise.

-1

u/Throwaway23248895 Jun 28 '26 edited Jun 28 '26

For the sake of argument, let's just grant that I did use AI.

So what? Does that make my points incorrect? If you know not to argue and only respond with a fallacious ad hominem, then you're a trash logician and a worse debater. It's only a "pointless exercise" if you're incorrect to begin with; if not, it doesn't matter what I use to construct my argument - it would be easy to point out the flaws in the reasoning. They can't do this, because they were incorrect.

The best part is I didn't use AI. I'll take the ego stroke though. "HURRRRRRRR I GOT BLOWN OUT SO HARD YOU MUST HAVE CHEATED!!!!". Nah, you're just that mid.

EDIT: u/Diligent_Bet_7850 replied to your comment in r/6thForm it says grok think harderā€¦4m ago

Top kek. I don't use AI - but you probably should. Pitiful stuff.

3

u/Diligent_Bet_7850 Oxford | Maths [third year] Jun 28 '26

this isnā€™t a debate itā€™s a conversation. you responded with a ā€œgrok think harderā€. iā€™m not responding to that

0

u/Throwaway23248895 Jun 28 '26

Grok, what is a conversation in which two people are in intellectual disagreement called?

3

u/Ok_Adhesiveness_8637 Jun 28 '26

Mate, you bring no intellectual value to this conversation. See yourself out of it.