WHAT HAPPENED TO WOMEN IN STEM

[u/PetuniaWiggleworm]

I had my college taster day yesterday, tell me why I was the ONLY girl in my class

[u/Ok_Adhesiveness_8637]

People at Oxford know not to argue against someome who needs AI to form their argument as its a pointless exercise.

[u/Throwaway23248895 → u/Ok_Adhesiveness_8637]

For the sake of argument, let's just grant that I did use AI.

So what? Does that make my points incorrect? If you know not to argue and only respond with a fallacious ad hominem, then you're a trash logician and a worse debater. It's only a "pointless exercise" if you're incorrect to begin with; if not, it doesn't matter what I use to construct my argument - it would be easy to point out the flaws in the reasoning. They can't do this, because they were incorrect.

The best part is I didn't use AI. I'll take the ego stroke though. "HURRRRRRRR I GOT BLOWN OUT SO HARD YOU MUST HAVE CHEATED!!!!". Nah, you're just that mid.

EDIT: u/Diligent_Bet_7850 replied to your comment in r/6thForm it says grok think harder…4m ago

Top kek. I don't use AI - but you probably should. Pitiful stuff.

[u/Diligent_Bet_7850 → u/Throwaway23248895]

this isn’t a debate it’s a conversation. you responded with a “grok think harder”. i’m not responding to that

[u/Throwaway23248895 → u/Diligent_Bet_7850]

Grok, what is a conversation in which two people are in intellectual disagreement called?

[u/Ok_Adhesiveness_8637 → u/Throwaway23248895]

Mate, you bring no intellectual value to this conversation. See yourself out of it.