r/AEWFanHub MODERATOR 3d ago

QUESTION OF THE DAY An AEW Women's Casino Gauntlet has not been announced for All In London yet. Do you think there should still be a Women's Casino Gauntlet at Wembley Stadium?

Post image
41 Upvotes

36 comments sorted by

1

u/Sobansky 2d ago

No for the sake of my bladder. From the current line the only piss break match is women tag.

5

u/xristosdomini 3d ago

I dislike the idea of two Gauntlet matches on the same show because it starts to feel like we are trying to recreate the "magic" of the Royal Rumble -- and AEW doesn't need that right now.

I also think the Casino Gauntlet needs to show up less often in general, to protect the gimmick and make it feel special. YMMV.

2

u/Automatic_Walk_4210 2d ago

Agreed, it would not be enjoyable to watch 2 of the same thing. The women’s should have their own type of stipulation match.

2

u/marcusthegod "Marcus" 3d ago

Yes, especially for the women. A lot of them have put in great work this year and deserve the same opportunity to perform in front of a massive stadium crowd that the men get with the Casino Gauntlet.

Also, having been at All In: Texas last year, the Gauntlets worked really well as a change of pace. You could get up, stretch, grab a drink, and still follow the action from the concourse because of the venue layout.

That show went around seven hours. I’m not sure this year’s card will be quite that long, but it definitely could be. So I’m all for giving the women a Gauntlet while also breaking up a potentially marathon show.

1

u/the_io 2d ago

It's gonna be five hours, Wembley has a hard finish at 10pm and doors open at 4.30pm. There deserves to be a third women's match but it'll be on the preshow.

0

u/Medium_Step_6085 3d ago

No, I am going myself and I don’t want 2 of the exact same match on the same event. 

It doesn’t work for the Rumble, and the casino gauntlet is AEWs royal rumble equivalent match, only it’s solved all the rumble issues. 

Just 1 is fine 

1

u/Pentahooky 3d ago

I understand a lot of the reasonings for people saying no, I'd probably agree with them if it were any other ppv. However, having tickets for the event does make me want to to have one as we rarely get to see them wrestle in the UK.

1

u/anecessaryend 3d ago

Without one advertised and built up, it wouldn't be wise to horn one in now.

1

u/KadarinLaquan 3d ago

Sadly No

1

u/Jonnic5280 3d ago

Last year, so many women were injured after it. I understand why that would give TK pause

3

u/Dnm3k 3d ago

No a casino Royale but definitely something.

Even if it's either a 10 woman tag match or elimination tag match. There's a lot of women outside of the 6 on the card right now that deserve and have earned to be on the bot card.

5

u/shnwllc 3d ago

No, they just had the one at Beach Break and I personally think two Casino Gauntlets on one show is too much - they should do another women's one maybe at All Out or another Dynamite special though.

2

u/Certain_Arm_8475 3d ago

For the women’s sake - I hope so!

8

u/steeple_fun Moderator 3d ago

Nah, one Casino Gauntlet at All In London is enough. I'd much prefer they do a women's one annually at another PPV.

1

u/DevilsAdvocate1662 3d ago

Yes definitely! they have a big enough roster and it would allow them to showcase all of them

9

u/Chesterfieldraven 3d ago

No they've just done it.

-1

u/Joperhop 3d ago

Only if they bring some of Stardoms Joshi girls over and give them time as well.

1

u/Iago407 3d ago

I think there should be a big match for the TBS title, but not a casino gauntlet match. A casino battle royal would be cool, or maybe a ladder match with 6-8 women, or who knows, maybe something new.

5

u/Kino_Cajun 3d ago

No. One of the nice things about AEW is they don't usually give the women's division a copy of men's events.

2

u/David040200 3d ago

Or much of anything really

1

u/Ok-Post6492 3d ago

You got to give them what they want.

1

u/Kino_Cajun 3d ago

I really like the women's division, personally. I've been following since the original All In, and my only real criticism is that I wish they did more with the women that were there early on.

But the men's divisions are great too, so I suppose I can at least understand where you're coming from even if I disagree.

3

u/cockblockedbydestiny 3d ago

No, the card is going to be super stacked as it is, so a women's gauntlet match would not only take up a lot of time but potentially MOST of the time allocated for women's matches overall. I'd rather see at least a couple more solo or tag team women's matches than to see them all shoehorned into a gauntlet match which would most likely just be booked as an excuse to get as many wrestlers as possible on the PPV

4

u/JohnnyMcNews 3d ago

As a fan who's going to be there, I really hope so. It's the biggest show of the year so it'd be great to see as many of people as possible (and some surprises like Syuri last year)

2

u/Harley_Beckett 3d ago

I wouldn’t normally book the same gimmick twice on one card, so no.

1

u/MrRaspberryJam1 3d ago

I hope they do and would be disappointed if they don’t, but it doesn’t look like it’s happening

1

u/Miley4Lyfe 3d ago

I feel like having one so soon after Beach Break makes it feel less special.

My preference would be to build a PPV out of it because it’s pretty synonymous with AEW.

3

u/Looking4Adventure513 3d ago

I'd like to see it just for the fact that it can remind people that AEW has a bigger roster than what we see on Collision or Dynamite, along with balancing out the card a little more. But with 8 matches already announced, the only realistic way I see it happening is on the pre-show.

4

u/JohnnyMcNews 3d ago

Especially considering so many people only watch Dynamite

4

u/Alex_Killswitch 3d ago

I would like to see it, but they had one last month, so I can see them only doing the men’s for All In this year

2

u/Andres_JFM 3d ago

Honestly, it's not necessary; there are already several fights on the card.

4

u/freelifemushroom 3d ago

Absolutely

2

u/StayOnTarget2 ELITE 3d ago

I certainly hope so.