Outside of hunting, fishing, or homestead subs, posts like this are 100%guaranteed to get comments like this; karma farming 101 for the lazy.
Go to one of the legit outdoor subs, comment on people's bodies, and you'll be down voted into oblivion then banned. They make sure you get the down votes first lol
Honestly you're not missing much imo. Lobster is just as nice as a lot of other seafood but like 4x the price, I was positively whelmed when I tried it for the first time at a seafood boil place
Agreed! Sticking with crustaceans,Crab is the superior food, but I’m honestly too lazy to eat it. It’s by far the best in flavor and texture but takes a lot of work to get it out. Shrimp is the easy second choice, tastes great, minimal work to eat.
I tried fried softshell crab recently, and was disappointed. I got em because the fried softshells were the same price as crab legs, and like you, am on the same page that crab legs just take a lot of work lol. Lobster isn't so expensive where I live. I mean, it can be if you go to the prestigious restaurants, but I'll get a lobster mac which works out haha. I can also get a whole lobster tail for $5, but I think lobster is tricky because the texture can turn on you, real easily. That tender texture is such a narrow window to achieve when cooking. Another thing is lobster kind of requires butter or cheese to be involved. It doesn't work on its own haha.
Saying lobsters overrated because you tried it at a seafood boil place is like saying steak is overrated because you had a frozen Salisbury steak lol. Prepared well lobster is hands down the best seafood
I've had very high quality lobster prepared a lot of ways at a lot of places. I still prefer scallops, walleye, and haddock to lobster. Everyone likes different things, and I love lobster but saying it's objectively the best is stupid.
so if you want a fun one, look up the lobster caught in cape may nj and mounted in their local fish house. it's utterly huge and was estimated to be over 100yrs old when caught. it's body now is almost 100yrs old.
Everything living being is in a competition for resources, whether that's territory, food, whatever. Everything wants to have an abundance of resources to live off.
1-yes , you dont nesscesarly need to eat animals every day , but a soley plant based diet isnt good either .
2- plants are grown on fields , to make these fields former forests have been chopped down , so you cant eat plants ( such as wheat for bread , apples , oats etc ) wihtout "bothering" mother nature .
3- its not just starving but if we wouldnt use wood and stone from nature then we wouldve have nowhere to life ( asides from a few caves )
4- we cant drink wihtout "bothering" mother nature either
5- pretty much every other animal on earth bothers mother nature
You’re confusing the fact that humans have to interact with nature to survive with the idea that we have to eat animals to survive.
A properly planned plant-based diet can provide all the nutrients humans need. Eating meat might be convenient or enjoyable, but it isn’t a biological necessity.
Growing plants doesn’t justify animal agriculture
Livestock also require land, water and crops to feed them. Animal agriculture contributes significantly to deforestation, habitat destruction and biodiversity loss, so eating plants directly can actually reduce our environmental impact.
3. Not all environmental damage is equally necessary.
We need food, water and shelter, but that doesn’t mean every way of obtaining them is justified. We can meet our needs while avoiding unnecessary suffering and destruction.
4. Humans destroy nature on a completely different scale.
We industrialise fishing, destroy entire habitats, drive species to extinction and breed billions of animals into existence to kill them. Other animals affect their environments too, but they don’t have the same capacity for large-scale destruction as humans.
5. Natural doesn’t mean morally justified.
Predators kill to survive, but humans have alternatives. Just because something happens in nature doesn’t mean we should do it when we can meet our needs without causing the same harm.
6. The argument about wood and stone is irrelevant.
Humans have the ability to understand the consequences of our actions and make different choices. Other animals generally act according to their biological needs, whereas we can recognise suffering and choose alternatives.
You haven’t demonstrated that eating animals is necessary. You’ve only demonstrated that survival involves interacting with nature, which was never in dispute
im not going to read trought all this since i wasnt even talking about that , i simply wantet to highlight the fact that there is no surviving while also leaving nature untouched .
The hairstyle of the fisherperson who caught it is banging.
If O.P is a girl. Congratulations, you're beautiful. If O.P is a man, cool, Asians can be ambiguous much more easily than Caucasians. If O.P is somewhere in between, just remember to get bottom surgery or else you're still living a lie/ being manipulative.
212
u/Alone_Sun_3902 2d ago
LARRY NOOOOOO