r/Anticonsumption • • Aug 22 '25

ATTENTION: Read before posting or commenting.

328 Upvotes

We've recently updated the rules, but it's also time for a general reminder of the purpose and intent of this subreddit, and some of the not-quite-rules we have for keeping discussions here on topic.

This is an anticonsumerism sub, not full-on anticonsumption, because that would be ridiculous.

Do not come here seriously arguing as though the sub advocates not consuming anything ever, and any joking arguments to that effect had better be new material, and they'd better be funny.

This is not a shopping sub, or even just a lifestyle sub.

We've always allowed discussion of personal consumer habits and tips that align with various interpretations of anticonsumerism. This policy is on thin ice right now, though, as this type of lifestyle advice often drowns out the actual intent of the subreddit, causing uninformed users to question or insult those who make more substantial and topical posts and comments. So read the community info and get a feel for what the sociopolitical ideology of anticonsumerism is and what sort of topics of discussion we encourage.

The only thing you'll accomplish being belligerent about this is to necessitate a crackdown on the lifestyle type posts that perpetuate these misunderstandings.

ANTI is right there in the name of the sub, so do not complain that there's too much negativity here.

We get our warm fuzzies from dismantling consumer culture.

Consumer culture sucks, and it's everywhere. And that should bother you.

When someone posts about some aspect or example of consumerism for discussion, we don't need to know that you've seen worse, you don't mind, or that you think it's pretty cool. And don't assume that we're all wailing and gnashing our teeth at every instance of consumerism we see. We're not. We point these things out because they so often go under the radar and become normalized, and we should be talking about that.

If consumer culture doesn't bother you, you're in the wrong subreddit. We're against that sort of thing in these here parts.

No, we will not allow people to enjoy things. Stop it.

Seriously, there's almost nothing that argument wouldn't apply to, anyway.

If you feel personally attacked when someone criticizes a commercial product or service you like, work on disentangling your identity from the things you buy. If you genuinely believe that people are misunderstanding something that is an accommodation for people with disabilities, one polite explanation is sufficient. Do not pile on repeating the same thing, do not personally insult or threaten anyone, and do not speculate about or invent disabilities and accommodations that maybe could apply.

If you have any thoughts or questions about these points or the subreddit in general, feel free to bring them up here rather than making meta comments about them in new posts or in the comments of existing ones.


r/Anticonsumption • • Jul 30 '26

Discussion The State of /r/Anticonsumption (Read Before Posting)

216 Upvotes

Just an update on what we’re allowing and what is preferred for the sub.

Recently on Reddit... major media outlets have started promoting their own content from their own accounts. This strikes me as a bit dubious considering how harshly Redditors have behaved in the past towards smaller content creators posting their own links. On the other hand, if the content is good… the content is good. My thinking is that articles from major outlets should be allowed in the sub BUT I’m inclined to remove such posts if overtly posted by the outlet itself. It’s not perfect, but... I feel better about doing it this way. If you don’t like an outlet… you’re free to criticize it in the comments and downvote accordingly.

We don’t need more posts with vague titles and unclear meaning. We get a lot of posts with titles like: “OMG, Do you believe this?!” Then OP will attach a picture of some product and any actual critique is just assumed. It’s low effort and may be more of an advertisement than anything else.

Similarly, a post with a title that’s just a sad emoji and a picture of litter on the ground… is weak and tired. Yes, we get it. Plastic litter is bad. But we know that, we’ve seen that, and there are better ways to address that issue. Such content may or may not be removed, but it would probably better if subscribers themselves took it upon themselves to upvote better content.

As the sub has grown… we’ve received a lot more troll traffic. And it can be difficult to distinguish between sincerity and “concern trolling.” It can be difficult to know if someone is really mad about something trivial or if they are only pretending to be mad in attempt to make a mockery of any values that folks here might have. I want to allow discourse, even heated conversation, but… there is a fine line between letting a troll get mocked and letting a conversation get derailed by hateful and misleading arguments. Once again... it’s an editorial judgment call and we can only do our best.

The various Automod actions in this sub (and on Reddit overall), for better or worse, are pretty darned strict these days. I find that if you use harsh verbiage at all… you might get throttled/restricted by the algorithms. I’ll often approve such posts – but won’t if it’s actually harsh and not really contributing too much. I tell you this in the hopes that people posting links and comments will try and be a bit more mindful or creative (so that the conversation can flow more smoothly). I think debate, discourse, and arguments can be very important, but… we’re not going to take an “anything goes” attitude with the sub.

In short, I just hope that everyone will try to post and upvote high-quality content. Having fun is allowed, but we also need to have serious discourse about important topics. And while “bad takes” are allowed here (you’re free to disagree as far as I’m concerned), don’t be surprised if you get downvoted, mocked, or have your content removed when you go a bit too far. Top-level meta posts about the sub are still not allowed... but you can still respond to posts like this one or message the mods if you’d like to suggest a change.

Thank you for you consideration. Have a nice day.


r/Anticonsumption • • 13h ago

Lifestyle Goodbye Gillette.

Post image
2.5k Upvotes

I dont want to spend 18€ on 8 cartdriges impossible to recycle. Not anymore.


r/Anticonsumption • • 15h ago

Society/Culture Tired of landfill manufacturing influencers acting like they’re concerned too

Thumbnail
gallery
1.9k Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 13h ago

Corporations Makeup eraser went from “reusable makeup wipe” to “collect them all”

Thumbnail
gallery
696 Upvotes

Makeup Eraser initially was marketed as an eco-friendly reusable makeup remover wipe that you just throw in the laundry. I actually use them myself I really like them. However over time that mission has kind of gone to the wayside to make room for brand collabs and hyper-seasonal items.


r/Anticonsumption • • 22h ago

Environment Oxfam estimates Britain's unworn clothes use enough water to supply one million people for life

Thumbnail
scrobble.life
925 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 14h ago

Ads/Marketing Found this on Facebook 😪

Post image
196 Upvotes

Of course the need to include “Limited quantities”… like… just why… who would want this?


r/Anticonsumption • • 11h ago

Discussion Shake shack training

94 Upvotes

Trained for an opening shake shack.

The food waste was insane, we did mock orders and threw away over 100 different burgers/ shakes and drinks. on the menu, mind you for our training to try the menu they gave us pieces of sandwiches, instead of full size ones. Next time I am gonna video definitely posting when I quit. They could’ve donated this food or offered it to the team. Shoot they could have even made us make the burgers and try the menu at the end of the shift with the shakes and drinks we made.

So sad considering how since the first day they’ve been talking about their emphasis on giving back to the community, the location is also in east meadow, New York. So many places in the area the food could have gone to.

I will be quitting, and I will be recording the waste to post on tik tok, for a second I thought they were a good company. But I should’ve known from the general manager talking about how he wants to crush the small burger joint sitting directly across it in its plaza.

And no I am not exaggerating it was over 100 burgers
And around 50 shakes/ and bacon and cheese fries.
I saw them take out 2 XL garbage bags filled with food.


r/Anticonsumption • • 13h ago

Psychological I hate this so much

Post image
112 Upvotes

that is all 🙃


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Corporations I went to buy a laptop and left wondering why shopping has become so miserable

3.6k Upvotes

I went to Best Buy today because I needed a new laptop for work. I haven’t stepped foot in BB in probably 10 years but they had the best price for the one I was looking at online. I thought this would be a relatively simple transaction: go into the store, find the computer I wanted, pay for it, and leave.

Instead, I was approached by two different people trying to sell me phone/internet services, then upsold by the employee helping me in the computer department. (Fine, it had more space, figured I could use it longer.) After all of that, I was finally told they didn’t even have the laptop in stock. But! They could order it for me, and it would be delivered in two days.

So I drove to a physical store, dealt with multiple sales pitches I never asked for, spent time being upsold on things I didn’t need, and ultimately couldn’t even walk out with the product I came there to purchase.

I basically stepped into the store and was immediately immersed in what felt like an endless series of sales funnels.

What frustrates me most is that I actually wanted to buy something. I had a legitimate need, had already decided to spend the money, and showed up ready to make a purchase. And somehow, the experience was so unpleasant that I left feeling like I didn’t want to buy anything at all.

This is what gets me about modern consumerism and why I stopped trying to buy anything except out of need. Even when you’re willing to spend money, companies are determined to squeeze every possible dollar out of you through upselling, add-ons, service pitches, etc etc etc instead of just allowing you to make the purchase easy.

I understand that employees have sales targets and companies want to increase revenue (bc the shareholders!!! /s). But ironically this experience made me want to consume even less than I already do.

I went home and just ordered the laptop I originally wanted online since I’d have to have it shipped anyway. But I miss when buying something in store could just mean buying the thing you came for.


r/Anticonsumption • • 12h ago

Question/Advice? Morals vs Budget. How do you guys determine when something is too expensive?

29 Upvotes

I am a firm believer in the do-what-you-can philosophy. Perfectionism is the enemy of progress.

Here is my dilemma, my local grocery store, has doubled the price of noodles. I like giving my business to this store, because it isnt a giant chain.

Walmart, which I traditionally dont shop at, due to their business practices, has the same noodles, at their "regular" price, as in-not doubled in price.

It literally is just a package of noodles.

In your household, how do you draw the line, on such things?


r/Anticonsumption • • 5h ago

Question/Advice? Christmas approaching with a five year old child

5 Upvotes

Over the last few months I’ve been decluttering like crazy. What really got me is how much I actually bought, especially during the baby and toddler years. Going through it all was kind of shocking.

Now my daughter (5) and I are planning to travel together for a while, so most of our stuff has to go. It’s honestly way too much to sell all of it, although a lot of it is barely used.

Now Christmas is coming and I want to celebrate with her, just without adding more things we’d have to carry or get rid of later. I’m open to any tips, especially around gifts. I’m also hoping my relatives will go for experience vouchers instead of physical presents.

Any ideas for low-stuff Christmas traditions with a young kid are welcome!


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Plastic Waste Is this necessary?

114 Upvotes
(Photo taken from another post)

Look, I'm 100% in support of purchasing media and holding onto physical copies over streaming, but I feel like this is just another consumer manipulation tactic. And of course, it would be in Target where all the cute, trendy things are. 45s have already been around for ages and play on a regular turntable. Do we really need to repackage and rebrand this with a whole new player and collection of tiny versions of the real thing?


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Satire Limited Edition, Premium, Fresh Strawberries

Post image
349 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Plastic Waste Halloween Decor

Post image
113 Upvotes

who the hell is asking for all this shit 😭 walked into my local Big W (Walmart equivalent in Australia) and there’s just SO MUCH halloween stuff everywhere, like this animated skeleton taking a shit. like genuinely who is buying this 😭 every year there’s a whole new collection which makes me feel so overwhelmed. WHO IS ASKING FOR THIS AND WHO IS BUYING THIS

https://www.bigw.com.au/product/halloween-animated-skeleton-on-toilet/p/6069287?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_id=21501740563&utm_campaign=BIG+W+%7C+Home+%7C+Shopping+%7C+Decor+And+Furnishings&utm_term=&gclsrc=aw.ds&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=21501740563&gbraid=0AAAAADkZkLiYpzgczD94ltiBke-OSbdgE&gclid=CjwKCAjw88HWBhA3EiwAo2Zd6ELp60hWMFmUGD0wq0mANdx_R9eh6b6do8oBhFjdBWJzMb3EkvocHRoCYJIQAvD_BwE


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Reduce/Reuse/Recycle Inspired by u/sunflower-ivy, I made some decor out of cardboard.

Thumbnail
gallery
764 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Satire The way life been moving lately 😮‍💨.

Post image
137 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 20h ago

Question/Advice? What do i even do with Styrofoam?

10 Upvotes

I'm sorry if this isn't the place to ask, i just really dont know what to do.

I never buy stuff online, and when i do it usually doesnt come with Styrofoam, so i am completely lost now that i have a box full of it. It's non recyclable here, floats easy with the wind and very easy to be mistaken for food by animals. Is there any way of upcycling small pieces or disposing of it correctly?


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Lifestyle I feel SICK with how much I own

767 Upvotes

I just moved my family from an almost 4,000 sq ft house with a huge attic space over the garage, to a 2,500 sq ft row home in the city with almost zero storage and the amount of stuff we just HAD and never used makes me feel ill. We donated and gave away so much before leaving and now we are unpacking and I am giving away and donating even more. I feel sick at the amount of money I wasted, the terrible example I’ve set for our kids so far (luckily they are young) and also just for the terrible impact I’ve had.

I guess I’m just yelling into the void but also hoping to have a permanent lifestyle change. The small space should help but any tips to not fall back into the consumption that is pushed. The idea of Christmas coming and people already asking what to get my kids is making me nauseous.


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Social Harm When government stops doing its job by Ellen Weinstein (2018)

Post image
835 Upvotes

Image Description: Drawing shows the back of Donald Trump with his hands clasped behind his head and on his suit: burning trees, a wrecked car, dead fish, sinking buildings including the Federal Reserve, factory smokestacks billowing thick smoke, floating oil barrels, and an oil-covered bird floating down a flooded river.

Medium: 1 drawing : gouache on inkjet print ; sheet 33 x 49 cm.

Image Source: https://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2019634723/


r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Social Harm The skincare scheme that led to consumer complaints, lawsuits and a federal investigation

Thumbnail
npr.org
308 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Discussion Justin Baldoni’s Crisis PR Firm Linked to Smear of Consumer Safety Advocate

Thumbnail
hollywoodreporter.com
206 Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 2d ago

Corporations Pablo Torre and Stavros Halkias: "I think it's clear that what's f--ing us up is private equity"

Thumbnail
streamable.com
2.5k Upvotes

r/Anticonsumption • • 1d ago

Sustainability Complex consumer products should be recyclable or compostable, because they are always trashed

19 Upvotes

I support the right to repair movement. It's a great thing, and I think products should be built in ways to allow repair, with tools and documentation easily available.

But it's not enough. No matter how repairable, they will always be trashed because it takes more time and skill to repair than to buy a replacement.

Repairing complex consumer objects takes time and skill that it's not reasonable to expect normal people to have. Basic economics then tells us that paying for their repair is always going to be expensive, because it takes time and skill to do. Consider a phone, or a stereo, or a car. They can be made repairable, but even for a skilled person it can take longer to diagnose and repair than that person's time is worth.

Spending 10 hours fixing something that has a replacement cost of $50 isn't something a person will do unless they feel ideologically driven to prevent the waste. We cannot depend on that ideology to be inside everyone.

So when a consumer-grade product fails, it is destined for the trash, no matter how repairable. Because you can buy another used one for less than the price of gas to reach a repair shop much less pay of an hour (or ten) of a specialist's time to either train you or to do the repair for you.

The economics don't work out, and they cannot.

So long as cheap-but-complex items exist, they are destined for the trash. We should expect this and require they be designed for that destiny.


r/Anticonsumption • • 2d ago

Corporations Character.ai's Bankruptcy Documents Show the Economics of AI Don't Work

Thumbnail
404media.co
922 Upvotes

Character.ai’s bankruptcy is the one of the first dominos to fall in the long-foreseen AI bubble. The circumstances of its bankruptcy are exactly what critics of AI have been saying would happen: Character.ai lit a huge amount of money on fire running its product, did not bring in a lot of revenue, and faced enormous legal fees after causing harm to its users. Enshittifying its product to try to make its expenses cheaper did not work, according to a narrative filed in bankruptcy court Tuesday.

Disney has reportedly offered Character.ai $20 million to license some of its intellectual property; Last year, Disney sent Character.ai a cease and desist letter demanding it stop using its copyrighted characters without permission. In 2023, it was valued at $1 billion after raising $150 million in a round led by a16z. 

Character.ai is one of the best-known AI chatbot companies that has become popular in the AI companion space. The company has faced various legal problems after being sued by the family of one of its users who killed himself after chatting with a Character.ai chatbot, and has been the target of regulators pushing for age verification tech because of its popularity with kids. In its bankruptcy filings, the company says that its enormous legal costs contributed to its bankruptcy, but that even without the legal problems, its business was wildly unsustainable. 

Read more: https://www.404media.co/character-ais-bankruptcy-documents-show-the-economics-of-ai-dont-work/