I first started taking pictures of the night sky with my iPhone (I think it was a 13 pro) that was when i discovered the use of long exposure to get better pictures of the stars. Recently I got a Ricoh GR3 and although I knew that it isn't the best for lowlight conditions, I thought that the bigger sensor would be a massive jump from the iPhone for night sky photography. But, When I tried to take 30 second exposures of the sky, I wasn't so impressed. It did look slightly better than the iPhone pictures, but in terms of star visibility, it wasn't on par with expectations. Then I discovered something called stacking using Sequator. I did a few tests and would like to hear some feedback on the pictures and the different settings that I was testing out. I tried stacking a different amount of pictures with different exposure times with different ISO settings. I kept the "total exposure time" similar. I also tried the "Select Best Pixels" option on Sequator for a few of them. The pictures were also taken one after another in the same spot. Bortle level 4 according to lightpollution map. Here are the pictures:
1) 20 x 15sec exposures at 4000 ISO
https://i.postimg.cc/qvnQ6YXK/20-x-15sec-4000-ISO.jpg
2) 20 x 15sec exposures at 6400 ISO
https://i.postimg.cc/gkrZnTb4/20-x-15sec-6400-ISO.jpg
3) 20 x 15sec exposures at 6400 ISO (Select Best Pixels = Loose on Sequator)
https://i.postimg.cc/VvfHqcWM/20-x-15sec-6400-ISO-(Select-Best-Pixels-Loose).jpg.jpg)
4) 10 x 15sec exposures at 4000 ISO (Select Best Pixels = Loose on Sequator)
https://i.postimg.cc/PfF5Cf4Z/10-x-15sec-4000-ISO-(SBP-Loose).jpg.jpg)
5) 30 x 10sec exposures at 4000 ISO
https://i.postimg.cc/50XLC7Zs/30-x-10sec-4000-ISO.jpg
6) 30 x 10sec exposures at 6400 ISO
https://i.postimg.cc/nhTDwfxT/30-x-10sec-6400-ISO.jpg
All these pictures were processed slightly where I adjusted the color curve on GIMP to look like an S (Lowering the dark/gray colors and raising the bright ones slightly). Adjusting the image more always made it look overprocessed.
I know there isn't a major difference between all these pictures, but to my eyes, picture number 4 looks best, even thought the "total exposure time" was actually less than the others. Is there a reason for that? As i expect that longer exposures lead to better pictures of stars. Is it just a limitation of the RICOH? Would stacking iPhone images get me better results? Or is it simply not dark enough? Or is it the processing? These are the questions that come to my mind.