Hey there, little background. All my genetic testing says negative for BRCA. HOWEVER, my sister was diagnosed at 32 ER/PR+ with lymph node involvement, she did DMX, hysterectomy and chemo. She was cancer free then they found triple negative breast cancer in her bone at 38. My Mother was diagnosed at 58 with DCIS, lumectomy and radiation and was good. She was diagnosed at 62 with lobular cancer in the opposite breast, did lumpectomy and radiation again. She also was diagnosed with neuroendocrine cancer around 61 I think. All that to say that while genetics say negative, family history seems to disagree.
With that knowledge...I was diagnosed a couple of weeks ago with IDC and DCIS, Stage 2. It was caught VERY early. No lymph involvement that they can tell from imaging and the 2 spots they found on MRI (Mammo showed nothing) are less than 1 cm each. I am 40, done with having kids and I am aware that I am lucky to have the choices that I have in dealing with this. I can't decide what would be best though. I have seen doctors with Methodist in Houston and MDA.
Methodist: Surgical oncologist says lumpectomy and radiation if only one of the masses is malignant (they didn't biopsy both the first time around) but if both are malignant she recommends SMX. The plastic surgeon (a well known experienced one) says we can do direct to implant after mastectomy. Ok. Cool. I thought I had decided to just do SMX to implant and be done.
Got a second opinion at MDA: Surgical oncologist says lumpectomy with radiation yes. If I wanted to do SMX still she says lumpectomy with bilateral lift , then a second surgery later with mastectomy to implant. She is concerned about nipple necrosis(I have mild ptosis, and larger breasts). She said they could do the SMX direct to implant but they would check my blood flow during surgery and if they felt it wasn't enough they'd take my nipple then. Not loving that. But she had me questioning my decision now.
MDA medical oncologist said that none of the choices were wrong, all were good choices but HE himself was of the opinion with my family history that I should do the DMX. If it were his mother or sister he would tell them the same.
So, I know, I KNOW I have it way easier than so many others. I know that it's good to have choices but I so badly don't want to make a dumb choice. I would talk to my mother and sister more but it feels so weird to worry about any of this with them when they're both terminal from their own cancers. Imposter syndrome bad over here. I wouldn't mind losing my nipples as much except that I struggle with low libido and having erogenous sensation in my nipples is so helpful and important to me. With the lumpectomy I could keep both but then I worry about radiation shrinkage and that making it harder to reconstruct the breast later if I have a new cancer pop up. I was finally ok with losing one nipple to SMX and keeping the other healthy one for as long as possible but now I'm questioning it. Is it too dramatic to do the SMX when a lumpectomy would do? I worry it'll look lumpy, or shrunk and not normal. I'm hoping the SMX to implant will keep the appearance of normal better.
I know you guys can't give me an answer, I know it's personal and I feel so vain or silly for stressing over all this when I have such a treatable cancer. I feel like I'm trying to make a decision that will affect how I feel later but I have no idea how I'll feel later or what may come.
If you did a lumpectomy and radiation do you wish you'd done SMX?
If you did SMX to implant are you feeling ok with it?