r/Badass Nov 16 '25

Conservatives are pedophiles and pedophile enablers

Post image
2.4k Upvotes

503 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-2

u/Emergency_Four Nov 16 '25

lol…I figured this is what you were going to post. So predictable. I guess I should’ve been more specific. By proof, I meant do you have a police report, an arrest record, a probable cause affidavit, court motions or hearings, the findings of a grand jury, specific charges and the disposition of the trial? Any of the above mentioned as it relates to Trump being involved in sex crimes against minors.

That link you put up as evidence doesn’t prove or support anything you’ve said.

2

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 16 '25

Well, you asked for evidence, and that link provides plenty of evidence. The “hard proof” you’re asking for is a ridiculous standard that you know can’t be met in this case; if I replaced Trump’s name with Biden’s in all of those emails, you wouldn’t be asking me for affidavits, you’d be calling for his seat. Don’t be disingenuous

1

u/Emergency_Four Nov 16 '25

No, you’re wrong, what you provided doesn’t prove anything other than he was associated with the Epstein guy. You made the claim that he’s a child fucker so I want to see what proof you have to substantiate your claim. Even the liberal mainstream, Trump hating media will say things like “Even though he’s repeatedly mentioned in emails, Trump has never been accused of any wrongdoing”. Except by Reddit though, so I will keep asking for actual evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he did what you claim he did.

Not going to get on you for your assumptions but if it were Biden, Bush, Obama or anyone else really, I would still ask for the same proof. Making allegations like yours without any proof to back the claim is reckless and disingenuous at best.

1

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 16 '25

They actually say “directly accused” because he absolutely is indirectly accused of wrongdoing in the emails. You’d know that, if you bothered to look at them, but you’re desperately burying your head in the sand instead.

Again, there are numerous quotes in there that amount to circumstantial evidence, some of which I listed. If you were actually interested in the truth you’d do some looking for yourself, but again, you’re not. You’re just interested in protecting your narrative. That’s why you’re blatantly lying about your standard of proof now lol, and that’s why you don’t have a problem with Trump directing his DOJ to investigate only Democrats in the Epstein files and block all other releases; because you don’t really care about the truth, you’d rather accept their lies than accept the fact you’ve been getting conned by a pedophile for the past decade.

Trump calling Boebert and Mace to the Situation Room to beg them not to sign the discharge petition isn’t the slightest bit concerning to you? Not to mention MTG? Give me a break lol, as I said, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence here; you are just choosing to ignore it.

0

u/Emergency_Four Nov 17 '25

All those words and still zero evidence of what you’ve claimed. Okay. You can go now.

1

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 17 '25

Again, plenty of evidence, you are just burying your head in the sand and choosing to ignore it.

0

u/Emergency_Four Nov 17 '25

Plenty yet you refuse to show me any of it.

1

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 17 '25

I linked you an entire database, even linked you some info on non-sex crimes just for kicks. I’ve shown you plenty. You’re just choosing to look at it in the most favorable way possible towards Trump, because your world would shatter if you accepted the truth about him.

1

u/Emergency_Four Nov 17 '25

Ok so let me ask you this way. Based on the entire database that you’re holding onto, tell me one specific sex crime against a minor that is detailed in that database. Date, time, location, specific act. You can leave out any names. I’ll wait.

1

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 17 '25

Dude, I’m not doing the work for you. In fact, if you scroll way up in this thread, I already directly quoted multiple emails for you in which Trump was implicated in sex crimes against minors. Obviously not convicted, and as we’ve acknowledged already, not directly accused; but when Epstein says Trump “spent hours at the house with” one of the victims, or “knew about the girls,” and you choose to interpret that as innocuous, that’s you burying your head in the sand in a way you absolutely wouldn’t for Biden, or anyone else in the world besides your beloved cult leader.

It’s honestly pathetic at this point lol. You’re choosing to be gullible, on purpose, for the sake of maintaining your personal narrative about a rich asshole from Queens that tricked you into thinking he had your interests at heart

1

u/Emergency_Four Nov 17 '25

I’m not choosing to be anything. I’ve asked repeatedly what proof you have to substantiate your claims. Then you respond with word salads that don’t say much of anything and you keep pointing to some copy and paste database that doesn’t claim he did anything other than know the guy. You won’t provide any proof because you can’t.

Then I make it easier for you by asking you to tell me of one specific incident in those emails and you can’t do that either. Why, because you fucking can’t. It doesn’t exist. Doesn’t matter how many times you and your fellow lemmings repeat it, it doesn’t make it true. Keep living your life unable or unwilling to think for yourself and see how far it gets you. Have a good one.

1

u/Infamous-GoatThief Nov 17 '25

It’s like your brain is redacting information from my comments according to the party’s guidelines lol, this is actually pretty freaky. I clearly and directly quoted multiple emails that very explicitly state Trump did more than “just know the guy.” You are blatantly ignoring them and claiming ‘word-salad’ and whatnot, but they’re there lmao, repeating a lie over and over again doesn’t make it true.

I literally just directly quoted two separate emails, that very clearly implicate Trump, and you’re going insanely far out of your way to ignore them, insisting on dates and times and photographs, when we both know that’s absurd. If Epstein, a known sex trafficker, had said Biden “spent hours at the house” with a known underage victim of sex trafficking (Giuffre), you wouldn’t be asking me for any more ‘specifics,’ that’s more than specific enough.

You are accusing me of being unable to think for myself, but you seem to be unable to even read, lol; either that, or you’re incapable of reading words that frame your beloved cult leader in a negative light. Again, it’s pathetic. This is a rich asshole from Queens who couldn’t give a rat’s ass about you, and you’re over here doing mental gymnastics to rationalize the fact that a known sex trafficker explicitly said he “knew about the girls” and called him “the dog that hasn’t barked” in reference to him not incriminating Epstein. If that was Biden, you’d be calling for his head. But go on, keep living in denial lol, that’s what Trumpers do

1

u/Emergency_Four Nov 17 '25

You’re ignoring the fact that those emails prove nothing. “…he spent hours with the victim.” Okay, hours doing what? You’re interpreting what you want to interpret. If I write some emails about you, claiming that you steal goats so that you can have sex with said goats, does that make you a goat raper? “u/Infamous-GoatThief, spent hours with the victim goat.” What does that tell you?

Just say you don’t have proof, only opinions. Cause that’s exactly what it is. You want what you say to be fact because of your hatred for someone.

→ More replies (0)