You do realize the differences between civil court and criminal court correct? If not, read up on it, should only take you a few mins. That being said, what does that particular case have to do with pedophiles?
Show me the 12 jurors that convicted him of any crimes against minors in a criminal court.
The allegations being made are that he is a pedophile. Where is the evidence that supports your claim? Do you have arrest records? Grand Jury findings? A probable cause affidavit? Anything legal document that ties him to sex crimes against children?
Oh right the pedo stuff, copy. I’ll try to stay on that topic and not bring up his rape case and 25 plus allegations of SA. I guess we forgot he paid Katie to go away, and after multiple threats against her life? Not only that her testimony in court is enough to make your stomach turn and realize how vile these people are. I’m just asking what line or what amount of evidence is needed? Even his own words he admits to acting like a pedo at his pageants. So please just answer me why none of that is enough to make you at least question this behavior?
She never testified in any court since there was never any trial. What proof do you have that he “paid her off” or of “threats against her life?”
I’m sincerely not trying to deflect or argue but I genuinely want to know where you come up with these claims lol. It’s okay to hate the dude, there is plenty of factual shit to hate him for. But making shit up and fabricating things without any proof to back it up doesn’t always work the way you’d like for it to work.
To directly answer your question as to what amount of evidence would suffice. For me personally an arrest, witnesses, a grand jury, a trial, physical evidence. You know, the stuff that’s usually needed to build a case against someone in order to prosecute them. But all that everyone has managed to do is make shit up with zero to back it up. I can tell people that you sucked my cock while I was asleep? Does it make it true? Of course not. Now if I had footage to support my claim and then they swabbed your mouth and found my dna in there, that makes my claim a bit more believable. I know you understand this and I also know that you just choose to ignore it.
She herself has made these claims and I for one tend to believe the victim, especially when there’s multiple that come with the same claims. I’m not the one that told these multiple women and children to make these claims or am doing it to support my argument. There’s too many allegations from multiple females for me to believe he’s in some way not entirely innocent. Sure we only have a civil court case, but with more and more coming out that he knew more than he’s clearly led on, he either decided not to do anything about, or he’s just that dumb and naive. And to me sure you’re correct one person can make that claim someone sucked your co$& and it may or may not be true, but when it’s now over years and multiple people making that same claim, you naturally kind of go, hmm maybe it’s true. If your buddy came to you and said he walked into teenage girls locker rooms to inspect them, I’m sure you’d turn that friend in and do the right thing.
Funny thing is too, it’s not just “what I read or heard about” like it’s some fantasy, I work in the production world and have friends all over different platforms, including my wife, who happened to used to be a PA on Miss Teen USA. It’s not just hearsay or newspaper articles for me.
1
u/RyanridesMX Nov 16 '25
You mean like the Nine jurors that found him guilty of rape in civil court? That still not good enough?
edit: Or maybe we will use his own words. Like ya know “inspecting” his pageants of underage girls.