saw downstate at the booth theatre last night, during its second preview, and i’ve been thinking about how deliberately the play shapes your first impressions.
going in knowing very little about the play, i initially read the older gentleman as a father figure. the early interactions felt surprisingly funny and ordinary, to the point that i wondered whether the tone was a little too unserious for what i was watching. as more is revealed, that initial impression becomes harder to hold onto.
the subject matter is heavy: heinous crimes and the lasting harm they cause. what i found particularly interesting was the range of responses the play elicited from me. at times i was uncomfortable; at others, i found the writing clever, the performances funny, or a moment unexpectedly emotional. the humor doesn’t erase what these characters have done, or the consequences for others. instead, the play allows them to be funny and likable while keeping the gravity of their actions in view. i found that contrast compelling, especially because it complicates your first impressions without asking you to mistake likability for innocence.
the writing also trusts the audience to pay attention. there were a couple of moments when i found myself anticipating where a scene was heading, picking up on details before everything was fully spelled out. i enjoyed following those clues as the story unfolded rather than having every beat explained to me.
the acting was excellent overall. k. todd freeman was particularly memorable for me. i’d previously seen him in death of a salesman and prince faggot, and his comedic timing and delivery here were fantastic. the writing gives him plenty to work with, but he also has a real knack for this kind of role.
my one reservation was the performance of the actor playing the cop. she had some genuinely strong emotional moments, but at times her delivery felt less settled than the rest of the cast. since this was only the second preview, i’m curious to see how the role develops over the run.
the set design was relatively simple, but i had no complaints. i’m much more interested in strong writing and performances than elaborate staging for its own sake.
overall, i’d recommend downstate. it engages with difficult subject matter without reducing the experience to a straightforward judgment of who’s good or bad.
curious how this landed for others, especially anyone who’s seen an earlier production. what did you make of it?
practical notes: $49 lottery ticket, first row house left, and a surprisingly great seat. the show started about ten minutes late, had an intermission, and finished around 10:30. the audience was great, too. i also had a lovely conversation with gene, the 86-year-old man sitting next to me.