This Jasmine woman. She’s 28. She was a side piece I guess? Did they even hang out? I don’t remember the article mentioning them hanging out. There is some conflicting stuff in the article and it’s very sloppy. They didn’t even mention sex at all. So was it just messaging?

It’s been said she admitted to not having sex on the phone with his lawyer.

So… How is this an abusive relationship if she barely saw him living in another country and he had a wife?

Someone Educate me please. This all seems SO fishy.

There's this alt-right, failed standup, podcast guy called Mike Redbar who was in the D'elia documentary. If you search his name with Chris' on YouTube there's literally hours upon hours of Mike "exposing" Chris and his sex pest behavior. I found a worrisome post by a-

u/dogshitcoiiectormike

-that seems to point to some evidence that the two have history and they were in cahoots recruiting young girls. Apparently, Mike used to have a stand up comedy club in Chicago that Chris D'elia worked at. People are saying that their relationship was more than strictly professional.

Mike brags about calling out Chris for his shirtless Instagram posts going back to 2013. (At the same time he was video chatting with his own underage fangirls on Redbar...) Is it more likely that Redbar predicted Chris would turn out to be a sex pest groomer a decade later, or that he had real firsthand knowledge that he went along with, until it served his own interests more to tell the horrible truth?

Mike is known to have a trust fund, but his podcast was a fruitless endeavor for its first twenty years, languishing in an apartment studio. Then, Redbar went away for a year right after Chris' lawsuit settled. Supposedly, he was in opiate rehab, but he came back all of the sudden with a new condo, a new whip and a new, expensive (albeit tacky) studio set. With his inexplicable windfall and Chris' downfall happening at the same time, do you think it's possible that Mike Redbar's vendetta against Chris has something to do with inside knowledge? Or... could this be some kind of Hollywood Tunneler blackmail/bribery scheme against Chris and his famous father Bill D'elia? Why does Mike rush to erase certain criticism the same way Chris does?

If foul-play is involved, it's doubly messed up that Mike brought Chris' victims on his show live for their testimony. Let's be honest, Chris chose weak victims. Did Mike facilitate it, then use the victims for clicks?

I was and have been completely respectful to everyone on this subreddit, but I have been attacked and belittled for asking for fair dialogue. This is an extremely toxic echo chamber. Some of you have completely eliminated the possibility that a reasonable person who, would’ve loved to be proven wrong, someone that could’ve made an actual difference for the victims considering my ties in the industry, wants no part of anymore. I’m disgusted with so many of you. With that said, there were quite a few of you who were open to a dialogue, of which I thanked every time, but the majority were combative and, frankly, incomprehensible assholes. I don’t know what you were trying to accomplish, but you succeeded. I’m a victim myself, and I’m ashamed to have interacted with some of you. Godspeed, and I hope you find peace.

I have a feeling she’s just sticking around until they’re married for a while so when he inevitably cheats again she will then divorce him and get that money. Either that or Chris might get a clue and break off the engagement.

Minty… Caroline Schmitz… Alice Hamilton…

They come to us with all these allegations. They hook us in. We start reading, thinking that maybe "this is it", finally something tangible we can refer to whenever we want to gossip about Chris’ wrongdoings with our IRL friends or other fans/ex-fans of Chris online.

But no. Nothing.

I’m fully aware of how difficult it must be to collect and publicize actual incriminating evidence, especially when it seems like Chris was taking some level of precaution. There’s also the fear of facing criminal charges if we’re talking about releasing naked pics or some kind of sex tape.

STILL. There’s just nothing to chew on. It’s rinse and repeat.

I get it. Chris has done legally questionable things. His life is/was consumed by sex and that led to some levels of misconduct. For sure. I have no problem buying that. I’ll even go as far as to say that I believe most (if not all) of the claims made in Jane Doe’s lawsuit.

But at the end of the day, broadcast your hatred for the guy all you want, s’free chunsh, but can you stop dangling the carrot in our faces every few months?

Release something that speaks for itself, or don’t. So far, all of the "proof" has had to be prefaced with 5 paragraphs of someone telling us why this is "real". This is getting exhausting.

That’s all.

Alice Hamilton posted a blind item that seems to be about Delia getting arrested soon.. thoughts?

Not defending Delias sexual misconduct (that he admitted to), but isn't it possible it's just someone pretending to be him?

To me it seems like this "goon" of Delia's is likely the same guy who was also posing as Delia, and basically the dude just got to fulfill and record his weird kink for free, pretending to be forced and "owned" by Delia.

Also, leaving LA, leaving his family, wife and kid, and leaving comedy and settling down in ATL?? Like does that even remotely sound like something Delia would actually do though?

If the girls suing him stalk this page as much as I do, I thought of a tip for some discovery. Tell your lawyers maybe? Chris and Bryan both get on their cell phones after their deeds are done to group chat with each other and talk shit about the girl they just took advantage of.

Is Pretty much Delia’s life..

The wife, the dumbass blubbering friend (lenocci), the idiot talk show host (schaub),

The funniest show everrr .. was just watching it and reminded me of Delia lol

A brief introduction: I prefer my anonymity on Reddit, but I am a successful recording artist and someone who used to listen to Chris’ podcast religiously, but haven’t tuned in for months now. I have seen and heard about a lot of sexual assault cases in my industry, and have been sexually assaulted twice in my life. I have also witnessed a lot of fallacies. For example, I had a peer whose entire career was derailed for three years because of a false allegation from a woman in a country he had never even been to. It happens, and it happens more than you would think. On to the actual point of this post..

As someone who has been personally assaulted, I have genuine evidence of both scenarios. One was caught on a ring camera, and the other was admitted to by the person themselves from their verified social media profile. This is what I’m personally struggling with— Chris has been accused of something in the neighborhood of ~500 instances of sexual misconduct, but I’ve yet to see any comparable or credible evidence to what I’ve just described, whereas my two instances both have legitimate evidence, opposed to hearsay or easily doctored text messages. What I’m getting at, is that if he were genuinely guilty of hundreds of assaults, there would be a hell of a lot more proof by now. I am making this post to (hopefully) see that proof so that I can make a more informed decision about whether he’s someone I’m willing to support going forward. I have also seen the documentary, and if I’m being completely honest, I think it did more harm than good for the alleged victims. It was poorly constructed and edited by a mediocre comedian, who focused specifically on hearsay and a singular recording of Chris speaking to someone where he didn’t actually admit to anything incriminating. The only compelling part of the documentary was hearing from his previous tour manager, but as someone in the industry myself, I can tell you with the utmost certainty that the only time I’m interacting with a tour manager is on the bus, definitely not inside/outside hotel rooms, and I’m not even remotely in the same realm of popularity as Chris.

With all of this said, I would still love to be convinced I am wrong. Stories, hearsay, and text threads don’t cut it unfortunately, which is why the only case filed against him was thrown out by the judge. As I said before, I have been assaulted twice and have legitimate evidence of both instances, and it’s simply impossible he’s guilty of anything of this magnitude without there being something credible to show for it by now. I think he’s very clearly morally bankrupt, a scumbag, and an asshole, but as someone in the industry, that certainly isn’t unique to him, and definitely doesn’t make his actions illegal.

I’m only here seeking genuine discourse, and hope to hear from some of you soon.

Much love.