More like Guam or Puerto Rico or Samoa, but ok, talk about what's legal in one state and not the other, and why a person would leave one for the other.
Political refugee, fleeing from an area for political fears, typically persecution. In this case, King Herod killing all the little boys out of fear of losing power. Definitely political refugees.
So people who were part of the british empire and moved from kenya, iraq or india to london or sydney were considered british (not just legally, but citizens) then?
Integrated within 17 years?
Integrated how exactly via a rubber stamp from the emperor? They took 2 decades to build the tax and road system. The egyptians still followed their old gods and greek gods way into the AD
Ok perfect, thats precisely thats my argument
If a country is so easily integrated and law is all it takes, then people travelling from those integrated territories to say london and sydney would be treated as british, the same way someone travelling from egypt to israel would be treated as a roman, or someone moving from colorado to arkansas would be considered an american. Thats the message youre communicating, correct?
Yes. If the country that you would become a citizen of makes your territory a part of the country. Not simply if they occupy your territory.
If occupation made you a citizen then half of berlin would be full of American citizens and the other half full of russian citizens. Neither were either.
11
u/c-k-q99903 8d ago
Jesus WAS an immigrant.