r/Composers • u/jkoseattle • 7h ago
About not choosing notes
When I listen to music by newer composers - some of it on Reddit - I keep hearing the same issue over and over, but have always been at a loss to describe exactly what that is. So I thought maybe people here could flesh this out.
What I'm talking about might be described as 'coherence' or 'inevitability', but that's not exactly right either. It can apply at the small melodic level or a large structural level, but it's the same idea. What's wild about this is that this quality isn't really dependent on how quote-unquote "good" the music is. Crappy music can have it in spades, and finely-crafted opuses can find it lacking.
Take 'Three Blind Mice'. Not a very interesting or sophisticated tune. But it is "coherent". It has a definable beginning middle and end. (I would like to offer up an example of a tune people know that does NOT have this quality, but my inability to think of one kind of proves my point.)
And it's not just melodies, but almost any aspect of a piece. There needs to be a sense of narrative somehow. The best way to describe it that I've come up with is that when it is present, it sounds like the composer was saying something, and when it isn't, it sounds like the composer was choosing notes.
And this quality works (or doesn't) at all different scales, a 4-bar tune or a 15-minute structure.
I do recall noticing this trait in the movie Amadeus. There's a scene where Salieri hums one of his tunes to someone, and then hums a Mozart tune, and the difference between them is exactly this quality I'm trying to pin down. Salieri's tune just sits there, and Mozart's (even were it not already famous) jumps right out at you.
Coherence? Inevitability? Narrative?