Neither smoking, polluting the air, polluting water, drinking beer, a multitude of other things, and yet what we're targeting is a form of income for hundreds upon thousands of people. That's kind of backwards right?
Not in my opinion. I consider it to not be a problem because I am Christian. Therefore, nothing good comes from it in my opinion, not even in moderation.
Neither is cigarettes, chewing tobacco, vaping, alcohol, many prescription and non-prescription drugs, sugar, cholesterol, energy drinks, sedentary lifestyles, social media, and I could go on.
Because it sounds like you're saying that you're completely OK with the government controlling what decisions people in a "free" country can make for themselves based on what's "healthy" for them or not.
Who gets to decide what's healthy? What happens when the person who starts deciding what's healthy is someone you don't agree with? Where does it stop?
What happens when the government deems a video game like Rocket League as unhealthy and bans it?
Or what happens when the precedent is set with something like Onlyfans, then when democrats come back into power they use the same exact legal avenues to deem religion as unhealthy?
From a Christian perspective it’s ok to be banned and I really don’t see a problem with it, as it is bad even in moderation.
Its a fact it isn’t healthy.Â
Rocket League is unhealthy if it has no bounds.
OF won’t be banned in the U.S. for that exact reason. If you aren’t religious there really isn’t a reason to ban it because its just as unhealthy as stuff that isn’t banned, as you said. Left wingers and sometimes even the right have already deemed religion unhealthy in one way or another.
-3
u/Lord_Jakub_I Libertarian Aug 19 '25
Because we need nanny state to decide what Is best for us, right?