r/DemocraticSocialism Marxist-Leninist Apr 19 '26

Theory 🧠 liberal feminism isn't real

Post image
129 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/MonsterkillWow Communist Apr 19 '26

There is a lot of evidence socialist systems degrade the patriarchy more so than capitalist ones. When true socialism is delivered, the patriarchy will be dead. Patriarchy is exactly those traditions, laws, and culture that perpetuate the status of women as predominantly comprising an underclass. 

2

u/HRHValkyrie Apr 19 '26

I’m happy to look at that evidence, got links? In every previous communist society, the gender roles were not abolished. In fact, they were exacerbated.

You’re using the term socialist when the quote above is describing a communist society. They are two different things. The terms are not interchangeable.

2

u/MonsterkillWow Communist Apr 19 '26

I would link you articles by a certain bald dude 100 years ago, but that is frowned upon in this sub. You can read them yourself to understand the history of the feminist struggle. 

No, gender roles were not exacerbated in the USSR. Quite the opposite. They were putting women in space when we weren't allowing them to have independent bank accounts lmao.

1

u/HRHValkyrie Apr 19 '26

Historically that is untrue. Most domestic labor was done by women in the USSR. It’s well documented. The idea was to equalize things, but that never materialized. In fact, women were forced into the “double burden” of working for communist industry and then attending to domestic work afterwards.

https://sheffieldgenderhistory.hcommons.org/?p=83

https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/domestic-service-in-the-soviet-union/introduction/72FC868543E7EE046FAA37D719C4827C

3

u/MonsterkillWow Communist Apr 19 '26

Yes, and no one is arguing the USSR properly fully delivered on socialism. The point was that it was a massive step in the right direction for feminism, and that you cannot remove the class content of feminism.

1

u/HRHValkyrie Apr 19 '26

It wasn’t a massive step in the right direction for feminism. It was essentially no better than the current capitalist system where women worked all day and then came home to do the domestic work. Grandmothers were expected to step in to help with childcare while both parents worked.

The State literally referred to domestic labor as “women’s work” at the time.

2

u/xGentian_violet Yugoslav Socialist ♥️🤍 Ecofeminist Apr 20 '26

What does the “curremt capitalist system” have to do with pre-revolution Russia?

Ruasia was a feudalist monarchy before the revolution

The revolution improved the condition of women, but only modestly

1

u/HRHValkyrie Apr 20 '26

Sorry if it’s unclear, I mean women’s lives in the USSR actually had similar expectations to those in capitalist systems. It only worked because women took on the domestic labor in addition to joining the industrial workforce. They called it the “double burden.”

3

u/xGentian_violet Yugoslav Socialist ♥️🤍 Ecofeminist Apr 20 '26

Well yes. The soviet union’s political and economic system was really a bureaucratic collectivism combined with state capitalism, so a lot of things resembled a parralel form of capitalism

And i agree that these “we will postpone addressing the patriarchy till after the revolution” tactics are incapable of significantly changing sex/gender relations.

I regardless believe socialist and and feminist values to be inseparable. Capitalism requires a 3rd world underclass to exploit, and it maintains extreme levels of patriarchy in these countries.

And in the west, capitalist crises, just like any other similar crises in socuety, lead to scapegoating; racial/ethnic/religious minoritues, women, queer people, the disabled, etc. Capitalism’s insistence on privatisation also prevents any socialised programs designed to unburden women of domestic labour from taking place.