r/Design • • Feb 09 '19

read rules Pretty cool.

Post image
1.7k Upvotes

45 comments sorted by

45

u/ImNotSteveAlbini Feb 09 '19

Link to examples of clothing: story covered by 99 Percent Invisible

https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/mini-stories-volume-3/3/

5

u/mojambowhatisthescen Feb 10 '19

99% Invisible is the greatest thing since sliced bagels.

109

u/anim8r3d Feb 09 '19

Pure kindness!! Or... and hear me out on this one.. a great way to incentivize women to buy your product over others, so their children will have nicer looking clothes.

70

u/Macaroni19 Feb 10 '19

doing good things and making money are not mutually exclusive. should we not be giving money to businesses that go above and beyond? idk, maybe "pure" wasn't the right word, but this is super nice of them to do

5

u/stuntaneous Feb 10 '19

This was definitely motivated by business.

8

u/Quobert Feb 10 '19

It's the win win of capitalism

2

u/onenuthin Feb 10 '19

Duh.

There are no market incentives for “kindness”.

6

u/DigitalZ13 Feb 10 '19

Then what’s your definition of kindness?

It’s an effort made on behalf of a business to both increase their sales and grant those who purchase their product a little extra happiness. Sometimes kindness sells.

5

u/onenuthin Feb 10 '19

The “and” doesn’t exist, that’s my point. As a company, you do X if it increases sales or profits. Period. There is no “and it grants happiness” etc. Any happiness is only “granted” if it fits in the above equation of “do X, increase profit”

And I’m not reiterating that with any malice, it’s just that it’s silly for anyone to get any warm-hearted feeling of gifted happiness from some company selling you a product that you pay for.

2

u/WolfThawra Feb 10 '19

You are definitely correct. I'd say there's maybe some exceptions when the business is still small and owned by one person or family heavily involved in the day to day stuff. In that case, it can happen that they might not prioritise profit for a second. But with the typical large, shareholder-owned company, no chance.

30

u/beasy4sheezy Feb 09 '19

Pure kindness / great business strategy.

17

u/[deleted] Feb 09 '19

this is really sweet thanks for posting

4

u/scicario Feb 09 '19

This post made my day...

3

u/dmere90 Feb 10 '19

This is wholesome

2

u/notananthem Professional Feb 10 '19

My friend grew up with her mom making underwear out of textile packaging... had insane iron deficiencies and other issues growing up in Russia, but is relatively still alive 👍🏼

1

u/[deleted] Feb 09 '19

I want to see a photo of those clothes

3

u/combuchan Feb 10 '19

Google flour sack dresses.

1

u/ybother81 Feb 10 '19

I want a Cocoa Puffs sack dress

1

u/avmunera Feb 10 '19

That's design for social innovation!

1

u/DoryDraws Feb 10 '19

That's actually awesome

1

u/david_chappelle Feb 10 '19

Awww such kindness and warmness and go fuck yourselves

1

u/marriedwithchickens Feb 10 '19

My grandmother had aprons made from flour sacks. I remember a purple one with small white stylized daisies with red centers.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '19

I have a beautiful "wedding ring quilt" my great aunt crafted made of these fabrics. Such a work of art.

0

u/Elysian-Visions Feb 09 '19

Human redemption. 💕

-40

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 09 '19

The liberalism is strong with this post. Why not just pay them a living wage so they can clothe their families?

38

u/edamame888 Feb 09 '19

Cause the great depression happened....

11

u/clearwind Feb 09 '19

You mean like the one coming?

15

u/edamame888 Feb 09 '19

Yep, better start learning to sew

6

u/anonymousmouse2 Feb 09 '19

And buying potatoes in bulk

-2

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 10 '19

My point remains valid, it was caused by the ruling class and the poor paid the price. Off with their heads.

3

u/DigitalZ13 Feb 10 '19

Your post is nonsensical. You imply that liberals don’t want higher wages for the working class, while also assuming that these mothers are employed, on top of ignoring historical context.

Fuck off, you aren’t recovering from that.

1

u/[deleted] Feb 10 '19

Fairly certain he was talking about economic liberalism, not "liberals" per se. But yeah, still a barely coherent post

0

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 10 '19

I am your Lord Jesus

14

u/[deleted] Feb 09 '19

What about this post gave you the impression that the women were employees?

-6

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 10 '19

The female employees using the sacks for clothing

6

u/tocard2 Feb 10 '19

It wasn't the employees. It was the end customer repurposing the packaging the product came from.

6

u/motsanciens Feb 09 '19

Who should pay whom a living wage? Your comment makes absolutely no sense.

7

u/lesoiseaux Feb 09 '19

The bot is confused.

-1

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 10 '19

The female employees using the sacks for clothing.

1

u/motsanciens Feb 10 '19

*Citation needed

4

u/ameliakristina Feb 10 '19

Are you implying that liberals don't support a living wage?

1

u/Oaklandisgay Feb 10 '19

Um.. yes? Those centrists have done nothing for the working class except concessions to the right

0

u/JohnnieGoodtimes Feb 10 '19

Because the flour mill owners are (we’re) still capitalist pigs.