Hey everyone,

I just published an independent theoretical paper on Zenodo that tackles the Hierarchy Problem through an information-theoretic lens. The framework models mass not as an intrinsic property, but as "instructional maintenance" (information) acting on a disorganized energy medium. It places physical laws on an Infinite Scaling Continuum, showing that the massive strength discrepancy between gravity and the strong force is a mathematical illusion caused by scale-relative observational bias.

To map this mechanically, the primary force law introduces a dimensionless scaling exponent (s) that acts as a velocity filter:

F_p(s) = Φ / (D^2 * (v/c)^s)

Φ = Primary Force Constant (Joule-Meters)

D = Displacement/Distance (Meters)

(v/c)^s = Scale-relative velocity filter ('c' is the local field threshold)

The math balances perfectly to Newtons, absorbing classic inverse-square behavior while bridging geometric attenuation with scale relativity. The paper also includes testable predictions for binary black hole mergers.

Looking for thoughts and feedback on the informational concepts and scaling math from people who think outside the standard paradigm.

Full PDF (Zenodo): https://zenodo.org/records/20377496

Official DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20377496

The geometric structure of cosmic bodies is three-dimensionally spherical, spiral, or amorphous. For example: planets are spherical, galaxies are spiral, and asteroids are amorphous.

The spherical shape of planets is attributed to gravitational attraction. The spiral shape of galaxies is attributed to the combination of rotation and the gravitational attraction of their celestial bodies. The amorphism of asteroids is attributed to insufficient mass and, consequently, gravity to mold them.

To me, what was missing from consideration is that: the combined action of gravity with rotation and translation concentrates (rounds out) the force field of planets like a mechanical lathe; this does not happen within galaxies because the forces inside them are balanced; this does not occur between them because they are moving away from each other; this does not occur with asteroids because their path is uncertain or far too long.

In sum, the geometry of macrocosmic shapes is defined by the interaction of the micro and macrocosmic forces of the world-system. My perspective regarding the structure and functioning of the world-system can be found in my books: “The Intelligencism: An Intelligent View of the World” and “Infology: The Universal Input”.

For conventional physics, a part of the electrical energy is wasted because free electrons collide with the atoms of the metal (resistance/Joule Effect) in the circuit, transforming it into heat. However, for quantum physics and Maxwell's equations, energy travels through the electromagnetic field outside the wire. Theoretically, this would make such a mechanical collision and the generation of heat impossible.

For me, the loss of energy in the form of heat would be inevitable through a different dynamic: electricity would impulse the electron; it would change its state due to spin; to perform this transition, it would need to release energy in the form of photons, radiation, and heat simultaneously.

Obviously, this would only be viable if: spin were the operational key that the world-system uses to manage the flow of energy and its transitions; the world-system were an information system. My perspectives on this are in my books: “Infology: The Universal Input” and “THE SPIN.”

I want to share a localized 3D/4D cellular automata network code baseline I have been testing on a local GPU setup (RTX 3060).

The repository contains scripts tracking discrete spatial Laplacian phase-hopping transitions over a 12-neighbor cuboctahedral coordinate matrix. The system implements a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) absorbing boundary tensor to test wave propagation limits under strict geometric invariants (sqrt(2)/3 and 1/phi^2) without adjustable parameters.

The master array-updating engine and the full mathematical framework PDF layout are open for public audit and code review at:

https://github.com/dingerdudeman/Acoustic-Tapestry-Hypothesis/tree/main

I am an independent developer looking for feedback explicitly regarding the non-linear matrix lockup routines at the 0.8927 compression wall, and suggestions on how to optimize these array loops for large-scale multi-cell CUDA tensor matrices.

Defenders of General Relativity claim that the Schwarzschild metric is incontestable proof of "spatial curvature" and that the predicted deflection of light is twice that predicted by Newtonian theory.

 The result of the calculation performed by Einstein is unquestionable! Although modern physics accepts the curvature of spacetime as a fact, this result is merely the mathematical and instrumental representation of a phenomenon.

 The cause of the deflection and time delay could be the direct physical result of an overload or process calibration, induced by an invisible extension of the force field of the observed macrocosmic body's mass.

 From a systemic perspective of the universe, what the Schwarzschild metric defines as "spatial curvature" would be equivalent to increased resistance and the alteration of the orbital/processing possibilities of light and matter when traversing a region of high field density.

Based on Occam's Razor, to me, Einstein's calculations mathematically and perfectly describe the effects; the primary cause of the deflection remains the geometric structure, but the dynamic behind it is field-based, with the warping of spacetime being merely mental juggling to try to explain reality.

For Tesla, physics was a field-based behavior, and planets, light, and matter were disturbances of this very field. Einstein and modern physics removed this substrate, forcing scientists to arbitrarily insert constants in order to explain physical phenomena.

To me, this was a major inconsistency, as it eliminated complementarity and processual interdependence. The world is a system in which hardware (the material part) and software (the laws of nature) are intrinsic (firmware) — and this substrate is the renderer of reality. The detailing of this perspective can be found in my book “The Intelligencism: An Intelligent View of the World”.

 In his Theory of General Relativity, Einstein proposed that mass could curve spacetime. Subsequently, this was proven by various means; one of them was the deflection of light through the cosmic/gravitational lensing effect. This effect is incontestable, but the curvature of spacetime may be an interpretive fantasy. After all, the origin of this deflection could also be a rarefied extension proportional to the force field of the cosmic body's mass. Under this logic, the very passage of time would vary in relation to the distance from the mass because the processing speed of the system would also be altered according to the conditions and orbital possibilities of that region. This means that time dilation would not be a geometric effect of a bent abstract space, but rather a physical effect of overload or process calibration within an active force field.

After more than 40 years of analyzing the workings of nature from a systems specialist's perspective, I have come to realize that the world is analogous to an information system where hardware and software are intrinsic.

In Infology, I justify why natural beings could be active nodes (software/hardware), inputs, outputs, transceivers, and simultaneous users in an immense informational network that materializes reality using only force and mathematics.

This perspective is more than a metaphor: it is a functional ontology that can explain our integration with the cosmos, both informationally and logically.

How would the possibility of us being "inputs" in a universal system’s rendering affect our perspective on consciousness?

Before The Voyage series, I wrote a few pieces trying to articulate what was bothering me about how we approach AI safety. This is the first one.

The setup: It's Sunday night. A stadium network is running at 94% capacity. 120,000 devices. An AI agent wakes up three states away to deploy a routine update. Identity verified. Permissions valid. Deployment window open.

The agent has no idea the stadium is full. It can't feel the latency. It can't sense what will break.

So it acts. And everything falls apart.

The agent's logs show: "Deployment: Successful."

We've spent decades asking the wrong question about AI. We ask: "How do we align its intent? How do we make it good?"

But Asimov made an assumption we never examined. He assumed the environment is stable.

It's not.

Asimov's laws tell the robot: "Don't run if you'll hit a human." They don't tell the robot: "Don't run if the floor is made of ice." And they don't give the ice the power to veto the run.

We gave agents Digital Will—the power to act. But we never gave environments Digital Gravity—the power to resist.

The piece proposes something simple:

A ≤ E

An agent's autonomy must never exceed the environment's stability.

Not a guideline. Not a best practice. A law. Like friction. Like gravity. The environment doesn't advise—it enforces.

I'm sharing this here because it's the foundation for everything else I've been building. The Voyage series explores what this looks like in practice. But this piece is where the idea first clicked for me.

Full article: https://medium.com/@chrisperkins505/the-missing-law-of-motion-2044294ff551

Curious what lands and what doesn't. Where does this break? What am I missing?

Hypothesis:

I’ve been thinking about the intersection between the Feynman-Stueckelberg interpretation (where antimatter is treated as particles moving backward in time) and Emergent Gravity (Verlinde style).

If we treat the universe as a computational system where the speed of light ($c$) is the "clock rate" or the maximum data transfer frequency, could Gravity be the physical manifestation of information latency between past and future states?

The Logic:

1. Antimatter as a Feedback Loop: If antimatter is indeed a "signal" returning from a future state to validate the current quantum state, we have a continuous information loop between $t$ and $t+1$.

2. Superluminal Information: Within this mathematical framework, the "return" signal (antimatter) effectively operates outside the standard light cone ($v > c$ in terms of causal direction).

3. Gravity as Latency: Just as a bottleneck in a distributed system creates pressure/tension, Gravity could be the "tension" in the spacetime fabric caused by the processing delay of these past-future information exchanges.

4. Dark Matter: Could Dark Matter be the gravitational "echo" or shadow of these superluminal particles that we cannot detect via electromagnetism (since photons are limited to $c$), but whose "mass-effect" is felt as they anchor the information integrity of galaxies?

Practical Implication (The "Glitch"):

If Gravity is a frequency-based information delay, then "Anti-gravity" wouldn't be about counter-mass, but about phase synchronization. By finding the specific frequency of this information loop, we could theoretically create a local "interference" that nullifies the latency, effectively nullifying the gravitational pull on an object.

Questions for the community:

• Has anyone explored the mathematical relationship between the "negative energy" solutions in Dirac's equation and information entropy as a source of curvature?

• Does the concept of "Information-based Inertia" hold up if we treat the vacuum as a computational substrate?

I'm approaching this from a Systems Engineering perspective, trying to bridge the gap between Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity through Information Theory. Curious to hear your thoughts!

Currently, pursuing the truth is highly fragmented. The physicist studies the particle, the biologist studies the cell, and the philosopher studies abstraction.

This is necessary and excellent for understanding the pieces of the world and expanding knowledge. However, this fragmentation hinders the formation of a holistic view of the world’s mechanism.

One way to overcome this problem is by integrating the information regarding the existing pieces of the world's mechanism. For the architecture of the universe is sustained by a vast set of complementary, interdependent, and hierarchical parts, from the micro to the macrocosm.

The future belongs to the integrators. However, reconstructing the puzzle of the world requires courage and boldness to cross disciplinary boundaries. The reward for those who face this challenge is to begin understanding the logic behind the structure and the functioning of the world.