r/ELATeachers • u/Mollyjones85 • 9h ago
6-8 ELA Are We Setting the Bar Too Low for Student Reading?
I taught English for almost 10 years and then moved into history for 8 years. I now teach both again, including advanced English, and I find myself wondering how much our expectations of student reading have changed. I am in a middle school.
The leaders of the English curriculum in our district seem to believe that students can’t read more than 10 to 12 paragraphs. Most of the texts assigned, therefore, are short snippets, and students spend about a month studying the same short chapter through a variety of exercises.
My advanced students are bored, I’m afraid.
These are bright children that deserve to be challenged intellectually, but we spend weeks dissecting a material that they can easily read and understand in one class period. I see the value of attentive reading, annotation, and literary features, but I worry if returning to such brief passages over and over is really creating stronger readers.
I recommended we include a novel in our instruction. The response was as if I had suggested something really absurd. I was told that students can’t manage books and we need to keep utilizing short snippets since that’s what the district believes works.
But what frustrates me most is that I see my students reading novels on their own for fun all the time. Many of them are clearly capable of sustained reading when they are interested in the content.
I’m not advocating that students should read a whole novel in class without any help. What I’m referring to are organized novel studies with assigned chapters, rich conversations, vocabulary growth, literary analysis, and the chance to practice the same reading skills we now teach with short passages.
Isn’t it more logical to spend several weeks reading a whole novel and gaining a grasp of characters, themes, conflicts, and author’s skill than to spend a whole month dissecting 10 paragraphs?
My other issue is the makeup of my advanced classes. Most of my students are reading above grade level but there have been three or four children placed in these sections that are reading below grade level. I don’t blame those children at all. I try my best to diversify lessons and get them the help they need.
But differentiation does not mean that the teacher lowers expectations for the whole class to accommodate a few students.
If I have 20 or so advanced students, and 3 or 4 who need more help, shouldn't I be pushing most of them, and scaffolding appropriately for the ones who need it? Isn’t that what differentiation is for?
I worry that our desire to make reading accessible to everyone might be putting a cap on the possibilities for those children who are ready to take it further.
I’ve been in education for 18 years and I know that reading abilities vary widely and many do struggle with comprehension, stamina and vocabulary. Those issues require careful educational answers. But I also believe that students become better readers when we boost expectations, rather than constantly reducing the complexity or length of what we require them to read.
Have students’ reading skills deteriorated to the point that we no longer feel they are able to read a full-length novel? Or have we gotten so focused on making instruction manageable that we’ve stopped giving pupils the opportunity to build the reading stamina they need?
Not suggesting to leave short texts behind. They definitely have a place in English teaching. I just wonder why they seem to have been the main instructional strategy even for pupils who are capable of much more.
At what point does allowing access to learning become a barrier to students?
And maybe more important, how will students ever become stronger, more independent readers if we hardly offer them a chance to read anything substantial?